| 160 so far and counting on 07:54 - May 7 with 1157 views | onehunglow |
They must be running out of platitudes .
Yep,God bless Texas |  |
|  |
| 160 so far and counting on 13:17 - May 7 with 1104 views | Joesus_Of_Narbereth |
| 160 so far and counting on 07:54 - May 7 by onehunglow |
They must be running out of platitudes .
Yep,God bless Texas |
Surprised they haven’t run out of people to shoot the way they’re going. |  |
| |
| 160 so far and counting on 13:43 - May 7 with 1096 views | ReslovenSwan1 |
I am convinced there is an understanding / rule in UK where by an man carrying an illegal weapon and a criminal record or mental issues past can legally be effectively "assassinated" by specialist police marksmen (or women) with permission and with out being fired on first or threatened. I recall a man from Bristol being 'eliminated ' about 5 years ago at a roundabout after a car chase
I believe a shoot first ask questions later approach ( with sufficient intelligence) is valid in the UK where citizens and most Police are unarmed. The intelligence was wrong with the Brazilian in the tube station but correct with the criminal in Tottenham that led to the riots a decade or so ago.
Activists from certain communities argued the man shot in Tottenham did not threaten the police and his gun was under his car seat and had not time to access it before being shot dead.
I accept that if I am carrying a hand gun with intent to use it and the UK police know about it I am susceptible to being taken out by a trained Police marksman. I will not be given the opportunity to use the weapon first. This is in my opinion correct. Certain English Urban communities need to be aware of this. Complaining of discrimination afterwards and civil disorder are not appropriate if you know the rules in advance as it applied to all citizens. [Post edited 7 May 2023 13:46]
|  |
| |
| 160 so far and counting on 19:45 - May 7 with 1028 views | Boundy |
| 160 so far and counting on 13:43 - May 7 by ReslovenSwan1 |
I am convinced there is an understanding / rule in UK where by an man carrying an illegal weapon and a criminal record or mental issues past can legally be effectively "assassinated" by specialist police marksmen (or women) with permission and with out being fired on first or threatened. I recall a man from Bristol being 'eliminated ' about 5 years ago at a roundabout after a car chase
I believe a shoot first ask questions later approach ( with sufficient intelligence) is valid in the UK where citizens and most Police are unarmed. The intelligence was wrong with the Brazilian in the tube station but correct with the criminal in Tottenham that led to the riots a decade or so ago.
Activists from certain communities argued the man shot in Tottenham did not threaten the police and his gun was under his car seat and had not time to access it before being shot dead.
I accept that if I am carrying a hand gun with intent to use it and the UK police know about it I am susceptible to being taken out by a trained Police marksman. I will not be given the opportunity to use the weapon first. This is in my opinion correct. Certain English Urban communities need to be aware of this. Complaining of discrimination afterwards and civil disorder are not appropriate if you know the rules in advance as it applied to all citizens. [Post edited 7 May 2023 13:46]
|
Why carry gun when you know without doubt that its illegal to do so | |
| "In a free society, the State is the servant of the people—not the master." |
| |
| 160 so far and counting on 20:42 - May 7 with 989 views | Gwyn737 |
| 160 so far and counting on 13:17 - May 7 by Joesus_Of_Narbereth |
Surprised they haven’t run out of people to shoot the way they’re going. |
Exactly.
If the answer is more guns how many do they need before everyone is safe? | | | |
| 160 so far and counting on 21:15 - May 7 with 980 views | controversial_jack |
Whenever there's a mass shooting gun sales rise | | | |
| 160 so far and counting on 22:13 - May 7 with 960 views | Fireboy2 |
That's a good white man's name, garcia.
What acomplete fvck up of a country that is. |  | | |
| |
By continuing to use the site, you agree to our use of cookies and to abide by our Terms and Conditions.
