| We’re Not Mathematically Safe 01:29 - Feb 26 with 1368 views | Boston |
...from the Play Offs yet. Let’s not get too cocky. |  |
| |  |
| We’re Not Mathematically Safe on 01:48 - Feb 26 with 1343 views | Benny_the_Ball |
Steady! |  | | |
| We’re Not Mathematically Safe on 02:03 - Feb 26 with 1320 views | Hooparoo |
Maybe next year 😉 |  |
| |
| We’re Not Mathematically Safe on 09:39 - Feb 26 with 1054 views | terryb |
Just another eleven wins away! | | | |
| We’re Not Mathematically Safe on 10:10 - Feb 26 with 1012 views | derbyhoop |
I think the minimum to reach playoffs would be 73 points. That's 27 more than we've got at the moment. So a mere 9 wins should do it.From 11 games. Just Preston and WBA away and 3 London derbies to handle.
I think we're pretty safe. |  |
| Travel is fatal to prejudice, bigotry and narrow-mindedness, and many of our people need it sorely on these accounts. Broad, wholesome, charitable views of men and things cannot be acquired by vegetating in one little corner of the Earth all one’s lifetime. (Mark Twain)
Find me on twitter @derbyhoop |
| |
| We’re Not Mathematically Safe on 10:11 - Feb 26 with 1006 views | daveB |
decent chance of a top 10 finish though if we win our home games |  | | |
| We’re Not Mathematically Safe on 10:20 - Feb 26 with 981 views | paulparker |
If and it’s a big IF we beat Birmingham I would like us to play Masterson, Oteh , shodipo , Owens for a run of games , let’s see what they can do with a run in the side |  |
| And Bowles is onside, Swinburne has come rushing out of his goal , what can Bowles do here , onto the left foot no, on to the right foot
That’s there that’s two, and that’s Bowles
Brian Moore
|
| |
| We’re Not Mathematically Safe on 10:22 - Feb 26 with 973 views | traininvain |
| We’re Not Mathematically Safe on 10:11 - Feb 26 by daveB |
decent chance of a top 10 finish though if we win our home games |
This has to be the aim. Build momentum going into next season, give the youngsters a reason to stay and hopefully attract some decent signings. |  | | |
| We’re Not Mathematically Safe on 11:54 - Feb 26 with 856 views | loftboy |
I think the safe from relegation total will be slightly higher than usual this year but am confident that 5 points from the remaining games should suffice comfortably. [Post edited 26 Feb 2020 11:55]
|  |
| |
Login to get fewer ads
| We’re Not Mathematically Safe on 12:19 - Feb 26 with 805 views | bosh67 |
| We’re Not Mathematically Safe on 11:54 - Feb 26 by loftboy |
I think the safe from relegation total will be slightly higher than usual this year but am confident that 5 points from the remaining games should suffice comfortably. [Post edited 26 Feb 2020 11:55]
|
Yeah I reckon 51 points is just about it this year. It will be similar to 2-3 seasons ago when Forest nearly went down on 51 points.
Two more wins to make the usual 52+ mark for us should do it.
Big achievement this year considering this is a team of youngsters and older players playing on comparatively low salaries. |  |
| |
| We’re Not Mathematically Safe on 12:43 - Feb 26 with 757 views | derbyhoop |
Wigan, currently in the last relegation place have 34 points from 34 games. That would set them on target for 46 points at the end of the season, a total we achieved last night. I think we are only 1 win away from safety but I'd rather be looking at the top half of the table. As MW said, just try to get as many points as we can and see where that leaves us.
I suspect we might just end up in the top half but without threatening the top 6. | |
| Travel is fatal to prejudice, bigotry and narrow-mindedness, and many of our people need it sorely on these accounts. Broad, wholesome, charitable views of men and things cannot be acquired by vegetating in one little corner of the Earth all one’s lifetime. (Mark Twain)
Find me on twitter @derbyhoop |
| |
| |
By continuing to use the site, you agree to our use of cookies and to abide by our Terms and Conditions.
