| Thomas Henry 20:42 - Jun 4 with 3522 views | magicdaps10 |
Report on twitter that we have entered negotiations. |  |
| |  |
| Thomas Henry on 20:09 - Jun 7 with 661 views | ReslovenSwan1 |
Keeping Ayew A has cost theclub a lot of money that could have been used to replace him while recieveiing parachutes. His £4m wages plus a likely £2m-3m transfer fee. amounts to a tidy sum to bring someone in.
Ayew reportedly had several offers but prefered to stay which is his right as he had a contract. Whether Copper and Winter gave him enough encouragement to leave is unknown. If Cooper leaves why would he be bothered about next season. Threatening not playing is not the way Swansea do this as we saw with the useless Narsingh.
Swansea will just have to roll with the blows and do their best. [Post edited 7 Jun 2021 20:14]
|  |
| |
| Thomas Henry on 21:05 - Jun 7 with 584 views | magicdaps10 |
| Thomas Henry on 13:58 - Jun 7 by Dr_Parnassus |
Nobody will find that, simply because it’s clearly not true.
Up to this point we needed sales to cover continuous and future overheads. |
Hardly touched in terms of being used to spend on new signings and I was not suggesting that it hasn't been used for anything else.
Apologies for not making it clearer, assumed most would have understood the direction to what I was implying. | |
| |
| Thomas Henry on 21:09 - Jun 7 with 567 views | magicdaps10 |
| Thomas Henry on 14:09 - Jun 7 by Badlands |
And address historic debt spent bringing in hopelessly overrated and overpriced and overpaid player trying to stay in the PL. |
That is the crux of the matter that has been talked to the bone over the last few years.... Clear to many but others can't or won't see.
Selling to cover the mistakes made by terrible signings(made by the board) to keep us in the Premier league.... Fail to prepare, prepare to fail and that held us back in both staying in the Premier league and making funds to make our attempt to get back to the promised land. | |
| |
| Thomas Henry on 22:44 - Jun 7 with 471 views | Catullus |
| Thomas Henry on 16:55 - Jun 5 by jack247 |
Because we can’t afford or attract quality like Guehi, Brewster and Gallagher on permanent deals in the championship. Agreed they don’t all work out, but neither do all permanent signings.
It’s just a case of do they improve the side or not, when they do, I’m all for it. We won’t get Guehi next season, but given his development, I’m sure Chelsea would be open to loaning us whoever is next in line.
To be fair, I think we do a bit of both. I’m sure Whittaker for example, was brought in with that in mind. |
I'm not talking about buying players like Guehi and the others, I'm talking about improving our scouting, doing what Brentford have been doing these last several years.
Anyway, as I suggested earlier, it looks like Henry is beyond our budget, or at least we won't pay the fee they want for him. |  |
| |
| Thomas Henry on 23:09 - Jun 7 with 437 views | max936 |
| Thomas Henry on 22:44 - Jun 7 by Catullus |
I'm not talking about buying players like Guehi and the others, I'm talking about improving our scouting, doing what Brentford have been doing these last several years.
Anyway, as I suggested earlier, it looks like Henry is beyond our budget, or at least we won't pay the fee they want for him. |
Brentford paid a few million for Ollie Watkins and then paid Peterborough 5mill for Toney, think they paid good money for a couple of others to. |  |
| |
| Thomas Henry on 23:25 - Jun 7 with 429 views | ReslovenSwan1 |
| Thomas Henry on 22:44 - Jun 7 by Catullus |
I'm not talking about buying players like Guehi and the others, I'm talking about improving our scouting, doing what Brentford have been doing these last several years.
Anyway, as I suggested earlier, it looks like Henry is beyond our budget, or at least we won't pay the fee they want for him. |
It could depend on Cooper going to Palace or somewhere else. | |
| |
| |
By continuing to use the site, you agree to our use of cookies and to abide by our Terms and Conditions.
