| Vote of no confidence 13:34 - Feb 9 with 1054 views | Whiterockin |
In Starmer on the way? |  | | |  |
| Vote of no confidence on 13:45 - Feb 9 with 1029 views | Joesus_Of_Narbereth |
About 18 months too late but better than never I suppose. |  |
| |
| Vote of no confidence on 13:55 - Feb 9 with 1003 views | Whiterockin |
| Vote of no confidence on 13:45 - Feb 9 by Joesus_Of_Narbereth |
About 18 months too late but better than never I suppose. |
I think the first step will come with Anas Sarwar this afternoon. | | | |
| Vote of no confidence on 14:06 - Feb 9 with 972 views | raynor94 |
Cheerio Cheerio............ Hope he's taking Rachel with him |  |
| |
| Vote of no confidence on 14:10 - Feb 9 with 968 views | union_jack |
And who is waiting in the wings? Ed Milliband has been mentioned  |  |
| |
| Vote of no confidence on 14:19 - Feb 9 with 953 views | Demitrius |
With Burnham currently ineligible, whoever replaces him will be even worse
Will the whole house of cards come crashing down before 2029 and lead to a constitutional crisis with no party able to take the reins? I don't think we even the bare bones for a National Gvmt, there is a talent vacuum in terms of competent MPs who lack backbone and want the country to succeed above their own ambition.
Personally in that situation I'd like to see emergency powers granted to a coalition of business leaders, economists and the few competent MPs we have to dig us out of this mess with achievable goals. Electoral reform, a written constitution, new code of ministerial practice, reform of the Civil service, human rights reform, legal reforms.....a huge undertaking but long overdue.
It's a pipe dream of course but one thing is for sure that these Labour mugs are killing what's left of the UK. |  |
| “Cunnilingus and Psychiatry brought us to this …” |
| |
| Vote of no confidence on 14:20 - Feb 9 with 950 views | raynor94 |
| Vote of no confidence on 14:10 - Feb 9 by union_jack |
And who is waiting in the wings? Ed Milliband has been mentioned |
The left wing of Labour were never happy with Starmer Milliband will be a open goal for reform at the next election
Sanwar and Eluned who refused to back Starmer last week know the writing is on wall for them come May | |
| |
| Vote of no confidence on 14:21 - Feb 9 with 948 views | Whiterockin |
| Vote of no confidence on 14:10 - Feb 9 by union_jack |
And who is waiting in the wings? Ed Milliband has been mentioned |
Angela Rayner? | | | |
| Vote of no confidence on 15:15 - Feb 9 with 905 views | union_jack |
| Vote of no confidence on 14:21 - Feb 9 by Whiterockin |
Angela Rayner? |
Please, no. | |
| |
Login to get fewer ads
| Vote of no confidence on 15:16 - Feb 9 with 902 views | Joesus_Of_Narbereth |
| Vote of no confidence on 14:19 - Feb 9 by Demitrius |
With Burnham currently ineligible, whoever replaces him will be even worse
Will the whole house of cards come crashing down before 2029 and lead to a constitutional crisis with no party able to take the reins? I don't think we even the bare bones for a National Gvmt, there is a talent vacuum in terms of competent MPs who lack backbone and want the country to succeed above their own ambition.
Personally in that situation I'd like to see emergency powers granted to a coalition of business leaders, economists and the few competent MPs we have to dig us out of this mess with achievable goals. Electoral reform, a written constitution, new code of ministerial practice, reform of the Civil service, human rights reform, legal reforms.....a huge undertaking but long overdue.
It's a pipe dream of course but one thing is for sure that these Labour mugs are killing what's left of the UK. |
Technically speaking Burnham isn’t ineligible, you don’t have to be an MP to be PM. Apart from convention there’s no legal barrier for him or Khan preventing them from going for it.
Rayner still has an investigation hanging over her and Streeting has far too many close links with Mandelson. Milliband has been rejected by the electorate before and is also a bit of an idiot and the rest of the cabinet are far too closely associated with Starmer to be trusted.
In short I don’t have the effing foggiest who could possibly replace him. | |
| |
| Vote of no confidence on 15:33 - Feb 9 with 883 views | Boundy |
Makes no odds really ,who ever gets the job will continue on the path of UKs destruction as a country we currently know ( we're on the edge of a point of no return but there's still time IF we can get rid of Labour now.) |  |
| "In a free society, the State is the servant of the people—not the master." |
| |
| Vote of no confidence on 15:36 - Feb 9 with 875 views | Whiterockin |
| Vote of no confidence on 15:16 - Feb 9 by Joesus_Of_Narbereth |
Technically speaking Burnham isn’t ineligible, you don’t have to be an MP to be PM. Apart from convention there’s no legal barrier for him or Khan preventing them from going for it.
Rayner still has an investigation hanging over her and Streeting has far too many close links with Mandelson. Milliband has been rejected by the electorate before and is also a bit of an idiot and the rest of the cabinet are far too closely associated with Starmer to be trusted.
In short I don’t have the effing foggiest who could possibly replace him. |
Builthie is in with a shout then. | | | |
| Vote of no confidence on 16:01 - Feb 9 with 857 views | Joesus_Of_Narbereth |
| Vote of no confidence on 15:36 - Feb 9 by Whiterockin |
Builthie is in with a shout then. |
Suzie Izzard has thrown her hat into the ring. | |
| |
| Vote of no confidence on 16:15 - Feb 9 with 848 views | max936 |
I sincerely hope so and he can take Reeves, Miliband, Lammy, Cooper and the others with him, never to return. |  |
| |
| Vote of no confidence on 16:18 - Feb 9 with 845 views | max936 |
| Vote of no confidence on 14:20 - Feb 9 by raynor94 |
The left wing of Labour were never happy with Starmer Milliband will be a open goal for reform at the next election
Sanwar and Eluned who refused to back Starmer last week know the writing is on wall for them come May |
Miliband has rinsed the Taxpayer of enough money, he needs to be binned preferably in the Thames. | |
| |
| Vote of no confidence on 15:57 - Feb 10 with 653 views | max936 |
| Vote of no confidence on 15:33 - Feb 9 by Boundy |
Makes no odds really ,who ever gets the job will continue on the path of UKs destruction as a country we currently know ( we're on the edge of a point of no return but there's still time IF we can get rid of Labour now.) |
Teflon Starmer will never relinquish power, not off his own back anyway, he'll have to be kicked out kicking and screaming. | |
| |
| Vote of no confidence on 22:32 - Feb 10 with 587 views | johnlangy |
Apparently not people. Just accept it. | | | |
| Vote of no confidence on 03:56 - Feb 11 with 547 views | AnotherJohn |
It looks like the majority of Labour MPs want to use the Mandelson scandal as a pretext to move further to the left, probably meaning yet higher taxes, debt and spending, and greater risk of a sovereign debt crisis. In other words we would be getting something that wasn't in the manifesto or the pre-election promises. If the election offer had been a Miliband/Rayner led, fiscally lax, socially-liberal administration then I don't think Labour would have had a chance of winning, But that is what the backbenchers who blocked a cap on welfare spending increases want and what by hook or crook they aim to get. That doesn't seem to me to fit within the spirit of democracy. Surely that kind of radical policy shift demands a general election? | | | |
| Vote of no confidence on 19:52 - Feb 11 with 448 views | Luther27 |
| Vote of no confidence on 03:56 - Feb 11 by AnotherJohn |
It looks like the majority of Labour MPs want to use the Mandelson scandal as a pretext to move further to the left, probably meaning yet higher taxes, debt and spending, and greater risk of a sovereign debt crisis. In other words we would be getting something that wasn't in the manifesto or the pre-election promises. If the election offer had been a Miliband/Rayner led, fiscally lax, socially-liberal administration then I don't think Labour would have had a chance of winning, But that is what the backbenchers who blocked a cap on welfare spending increases want and what by hook or crook they aim to get. That doesn't seem to me to fit within the spirit of democracy. Surely that kind of radical policy shift demands a general election? |
After Ratcliffe’s shot across their bow today common sense would say there is a major problem and whoever is in power owns it.
Self preservation in Westminster and The Senedd has cost this country dear and Starmer is only the latest of that batch….but by far the worst. | | | |
| Vote of no confidence on 20:07 - Feb 11 with 437 views | onehunglow |
| Vote of no confidence on 03:56 - Feb 11 by AnotherJohn |
It looks like the majority of Labour MPs want to use the Mandelson scandal as a pretext to move further to the left, probably meaning yet higher taxes, debt and spending, and greater risk of a sovereign debt crisis. In other words we would be getting something that wasn't in the manifesto or the pre-election promises. If the election offer had been a Miliband/Rayner led, fiscally lax, socially-liberal administration then I don't think Labour would have had a chance of winning, But that is what the backbenchers who blocked a cap on welfare spending increases want and what by hook or crook they aim to get. That doesn't seem to me to fit within the spirit of democracy. Surely that kind of radical policy shift demands a general election? |
Well, left is good apparently and far better than extreme right as it’s more humanitarian and looks after “ working people” or ordinary ones
We need an extreme right wing government who will do the will of the majority
We don’t need Fabian types pining for the poor as these Kent’s are invariably wealthy Londoners | |
| |
| Vote of no confidence on 23:03 - Feb 11 with 384 views | AnotherJohn |
| Vote of no confidence on 19:52 - Feb 11 by Luther27 |
After Ratcliffe’s shot across their bow today common sense would say there is a major problem and whoever is in power owns it.
Self preservation in Westminster and The Senedd has cost this country dear and Starmer is only the latest of that batch….but by far the worst. |
That was an interesting intervention that has incurred the wrath of Starmer and Ed Davey.
https://www.bbc.com/news/artic
Ratcliffe may have misspoken when he quoted population figures, which refer to the 2000 to 2025 period rather than 2020-2025, but the big picture he presents doesn't seem far off the truth to me. | | | |
| Vote of no confidence on 02:18 - Feb 13 with 222 views | Robbie |
Looks like Sir Chris Wormald , google search for ths name of course and whoever this desevered Knighted hanger on has been thrown under the bus yet again .
Sure he will not give up that honour without a comeback in the future ,
Book sales or a Official Secret Act signed and a massive compensation package incoming .
The Elite and Politicians around us , I really give up on honestly these days . | | | |
| |
By continuing to use the site, you agree to our use of cookies and to abide by our Terms and Conditions.
