| PC bollo*cks gone mad with John Humphreys 19:40 - Jan 13 with 31700 views | BrynCartwright |
This PC bullshit is starting to drive me mad now.
John Humphreys has always advocated equality in journalism and equal pay for equal work.
It is called meritocracy.
Ultimately we will be left with only female presenters on the news, sports, chat shows, sitcoms, weather, stand up, reality shows, because all the guys are too scared to open their mouths in case they are categorised as devious sexist pigs.
|  |
| |  |
| PC bollo*cks gone mad with John Humphreys on 08:34 - Jan 25 with 3431 views | Lohengrin |
| PC bollo*cks gone mad with John Humphreys on 07:37 - Jan 25 by Kilkennyjack |
You must be very proud. Tvvvat.
Judge a man by the company he keeps.
No real welsh person ever supports the Conservative and Unionist party.
We stand against them. Always. |
You're going to have to elaborate on that, Killy. Going back to my schooldays if I was asked what was your ideal of a 'real' Welshman the chances are my notions would have been bound up in the person of little Tasker Watkins. Probably the antithesis of everything that you'd have in mind? |  |
| An idea isn't responsible for those who believe in it. |
| |
| PC bollo*cks gone mad with John Humphreys on 09:41 - Jan 25 with 3389 views | WarwickHunt |
| PC bollo*cks gone mad with John Humphreys on 05:18 - Jan 25 by Mo_Wives |
What do you think of the fact that Lisa has admitted that my joke made her stop engaging?
I literally got under her skin.
This was the post where you thought she was getting under my skin.
You're suffering from unconscious bias, my friend.
See a head doctor  
Sometimes this shit is just too easy.  |
Literally? Mad skillz, bruv. 
 |  | | |
| PC bollo*cks gone mad with John Humphreys on 09:49 - Jan 25 with 3384 views | exiledclaseboy |
| PC bollo*cks gone mad with John Humphreys on 05:18 - Jan 25 by Mo_Wives |
What do you think of the fact that Lisa has admitted that my joke made her stop engaging?
I literally got under her skin.
This was the post where you thought she was getting under my skin.
You're suffering from unconscious bias, my friend.
See a head doctor
Sometimes this shit is just too easy. |
You’re just a slippery internet genius, Mo. Us stupid snowflake SJWs just cower in your online presence. |  |
| |
| PC bollo*cks gone mad with John Humphreys on 10:56 - Jan 25 with 3355 views | Mo_Wives |
| PC bollo*cks gone mad with John Humphreys on 07:37 - Jan 25 by Kilkennyjack |
You must be very proud. Tvvvat.
Judge a man by the company he keeps.
No real welsh person ever supports the Conservative and Unionist party.
We stand against them. Always. |
WOW...you are incredibly stupid. Not just because you've replied to the wrong post
but you still haven't grasp the point I was making.
And I judge a man by his own actions. |  |
| |
| PC bollo*cks gone mad with John Humphreys on 11:05 - Jan 25 with 3347 views | Mo_Wives |
| PC bollo*cks gone mad with John Humphreys on 09:49 - Jan 25 by exiledclaseboy |
You’re just a slippery internet genius, Mo. Us stupid snowflake SJWs just cower in your online presence. |
TBH, we have a clash of ideologies.
Look, it maybe I'm right and you're wrong.
Or it could be you're right and I'm wrong
Or maybe we're all right because the truth is subjective. Now I'd like that, but that shit ain't the truth.
The truth is you are the bulls and I am the matador
But I'm tryin', Ringo. I'm tryin' real hard to be the shepherd.
| |
| |
| PC bollo*cks gone mad with John Humphreys on 21:00 - Jan 25 with 3274 views | dizietsma |
Mo...."If the stats were 29% of male first time offenders and 29% of female offenders were sentenced to custody and men and women both have a 62% chance of being bailed, then this would be equality of outcome. So, in fact, it's incredibly easy to be sure."
Me: Not if they are up in court for different crimes. Men being, I think, more likely to be committing violent crimes, the ladies for shoplifting. Nor if they escape custody because, for example, they are single parents or carers (more likely for women probably).
Like the pay gap stats, they only appear biased at a cursory glance, they don't tell the whole truth. |  | | |
| PC bollo*cks gone mad with John Humphreys on 21:15 - Jan 25 with 3249 views | Kilkennyjack |
| PC bollo*cks gone mad with John Humphreys on 10:56 - Jan 25 by Mo_Wives |
WOW...you are incredibly stupid. Not just because you've replied to the wrong post
but you still haven't grasp the point I was making.
And I judge a man by his own actions. |
Dear pound shop Einstein - i know exactly which post i replied to.
Try reading it again.
Full of your own self importance.
But you are a dickhead.
Wow ...indeed ... |  |
| Beware of the Risen People
|
| |
Login to get fewer ads
| PC bollo*cks gone mad with John Humphreys on 05:41 - Jan 26 with 3194 views | Mo_Wives |
| PC bollo*cks gone mad with John Humphreys on 21:00 - Jan 25 by dizietsma |
Mo...."If the stats were 29% of male first time offenders and 29% of female offenders were sentenced to custody and men and women both have a 62% chance of being bailed, then this would be equality of outcome. So, in fact, it's incredibly easy to be sure."
Me: Not if they are up in court for different crimes. Men being, I think, more likely to be committing violent crimes, the ladies for shoplifting. Nor if they escape custody because, for example, they are single parents or carers (more likely for women probably).
Like the pay gap stats, they only appear biased at a cursory glance, they don't tell the whole truth. |
"Like the pay gap stats, they only appear biased at a cursory glance, they don't tell the whole truth."
YES. WHY ARE YOU TELLING ME? I AM SAYING THE SAME THING AS YOU. TELL THE OTHER TEAM. I am not saying it's unfair on men. I am asking if the people who judge the pay gap on a cursory glance to push a 'women are oppressed' narrative have the grace to treat the sentencing gap in the same manner. I, like you, treat them in the same manner. Me and you agree, my friend...you are also a woman hating Nazi. congratulations. (I'm being sarcastic about the 'woman hating Nazi', btw)
I think you are mixing up equality of outcome. I am against equality of outcome. For example.
If 70% of University STEM subjects are taken by men and so you want to push more women into STEM because you think 70% vs 30% is the type of inequality you want to fight and you want to see that number become 50% vs 50% then you want 'equality of outcome'. This is not me.
If you say are men and women allowed to go into STEM? yes. Is the gap because less women chose to go into it? yes. OK, who cares? leave people be free to make their own choices. Then you want 'equality of opportunity'. This is me
I feel we're talking past each other. Let me give you an example of why I brought up the sentencing gap...
If a Man Utd fan was arguing with me that United are being unfairly treated by the premier league because the premier league hate United. Then he gives the example that Liverpool won the league but United scored the most goals. So I say "but last year Liverpool scored the most goals but United won the league...were Liverpool being cheated?" Then I am not making the argument that Liverpool were cheated...I'm just trying to debunk his argument. This is why I brought up the other gaps.
[Post edited 26 Jan 2018 7:07]
| |
| |
| PC bollo*cks gone mad with John Humphreys on 09:24 - Jan 26 with 3145 views | perchrockjack |
No real Welsh person?
Well,sorry me ol cock, thousands do, thousands . Why? Because it's a free country and people can vote for they want
You really don't understand democracy ,son, do ya
I d suggest no real sensible Welsh person would vote Plaid . Most do
Can you get a postal vote for Sein Fein | |
| |
| PC bollo*cks gone mad with John Humphreys on 09:30 - Jan 26 with 3142 views | Mo_Wives |
| PC bollo*cks gone mad with John Humphreys on 09:24 - Jan 26 by perchrockjack |
No real Welsh person?
Well,sorry me ol cock, thousands do, thousands . Why? Because it's a free country and people can vote for they want
You really don't understand democracy ,son, do ya
I d suggest no real sensible Welsh person would vote Plaid . Most do
Can you get a postal vote for Sein Fein |
He thinks you're an uncle Tom Jones, Perch | |
| |
| PC bollo*cks gone mad with John Humphreys on 09:41 - Jan 26 with 3130 views | pikeypaul |
| PC bollo*cks gone mad with John Humphreys on 06:22 - Jan 26 by Mo_Wives |
Perfect. Well done pound shop Forrest Gump.
Haven't you got planes that need pointing at? chop-chop, you big girls blouse.
And yes...of course I'm a dickhead, I'm arguing with people on the internet. When did I say I wasn't? The difference between me and you is I know what I am, yet you've never realised that you're also a dickhead. And of course the fact I'm just a bit stupid...while you're incredibly stupid.
Oh, and by the way, if you want to see examples of 'self importance' why don't you look to the woman in this thread who claimed because I watch YouTube I haven't got the credentials to argue with her. She has worked in about 8 offices so she is equipped to understand what happens in offices across the whole country (She likens this experience/ability to Pep Guardiola - The best in the world. LOL). In the next breath she dismisses people who have actually done in depth studies into the same subject. That, my friend, is self importance. I fear you missed this either due to unconscious bias or cognitive dissonance. [Post edited 26 Jan 2018 6:47]
|
Mo, I can see you have quoted the terrorist loving filth but the text does not come up since he’s on ignore,from memory the thick mick is probably the dullesst Coont on the site, I’ve had him on ignore for months,you should do the same.
It’s funny how the usual suspects turn s blind eye to his support of killing British children and civilians by cowardly terrorist filth. [Post edited 26 Jan 2018 9:59]
|  |
| |
| PC bollo*cks gone mad with John Humphreys on 09:54 - Jan 26 with 3119 views | perchrockjack |
Trample is just harmless nuts but Killy is different gravy .
Here s a guy eulogising over dead Irish rebel poets whose work was on his avatar .its now removed after I pointed it out.
Here s a punter, although he would deny it, who,seemingly ,supports and justifies armed struggle whether it's in Basque land,Catalonia or Ireland . Hatred towards England is palpable . Voting only allowed for plaid or anything left .
No real Welsh person? If he is an example,it's no wonder the rest of the U.K. Takes the pisse out of us more in pity than anything else and pity is what we should feel for this chap , | |
| |
| PC bollo*cks gone mad with John Humphreys on 10:03 - Jan 26 with 3111 views | Mo_Wives |
| PC bollo*cks gone mad with John Humphreys on 09:41 - Jan 26 by pikeypaul |
Mo, I can see you have quoted the terrorist loving filth but the text does not come up since he’s on ignore,from memory the thick mick is probably the dullesst Coont on the site, I’ve had him on ignore for months,you should do the same.
It’s funny how the usual suspects turn s blind eye to his support of killing British children and civilians by cowardly terrorist filth. [Post edited 26 Jan 2018 9:59]
|
While I respect your right to deal with him whichever way you see fit, my friend. I'm basically all about thrashing out differences, throwing insults, maybe seeing each others point a bit more clear and ultimately coming together, if not in agreement, then maybe in mutual respect...
One day I hope we can all be friends.
You may say I'm a dreamer...
If we never get there, at least I know I tried. But as I say, you are free to call him a c*nt | |
| |
| PC bollo*cks gone mad with John Humphreys on 10:08 - Jan 26 with 3104 views | perchrockjack |
Fair play,Mo.thats some posting.
It's not often I feel humble | |
| |
| PC bollo*cks gone mad with John Humphreys on 10:13 - Jan 26 with 3096 views | Mo_Wives |
| PC bollo*cks gone mad with John Humphreys on 10:08 - Jan 26 by perchrockjack |
Fair play,Mo.thats some posting.
It's not often I feel humble |
Thank you, Perch.  | |
| |
| PC bollo*cks gone mad with John Humphreys on 10:14 - Jan 26 with 3093 views | perchrockjack |
Now help me on the Churchill thread .ive got a percent movement at the moment | |
| |
| PC bollo*cks gone mad with John Humphreys on 10:18 - Jan 26 with 3086 views | Highjack |
| PC bollo*cks gone mad with John Humphreys on 10:14 - Jan 26 by perchrockjack |
Now help me on the Churchill thread .ive got a percent movement at the moment |
Just eat a bit more fibre and you'll be fine. |  |
| |
| PC bollo*cks gone mad with John Humphreys on 15:37 - Jan 27 with 2900 views | Nirvana |
| PC bollo*cks gone mad with John Humphreys on 12:32 - Jan 22 by londonlisa2001 |
You continue to miss the point.
I was pointing out the flaws in Peterson's argument. It was he who said in that interview that people with traditionally masculine qualities get on better not me. He then said that wasn't gender discrimination, which is nonsense. It is, just couched in different terms,
I then gave an example based on height. Which shows the same thing.
Your example about sales in a bad one, because an area like sales, which is completely measurable, shows less geneder bias than other more measurable areas.
The biggest reason for gender inequality around pay is lack of women in senior roles. Not sales staff or similar. Numbers of men and women at more junior levels is pretty consistent, and pay is pretty consistent. The issue is far further up in organisations. Where there aren't such easily measurable 'who is better' factors. And it's there that the discrimination continues due to the men in situ promoting in their own image.
It's known as unconscious bias. People tend to promote those that are most similar to themselves. It's what leads to the whole notion of 'old school tie'. It's what leads to Japanese firms almost invariably having all their very senior staff being Japanese, even in London. Or old banks having a disproportionate number of Jewish people at the top.
All of those things are not allowed 'in law'. But the processes aren't overtly discriminatory. They arise because people promote people like themselves. And it happens with women.
I don't speak of any feminist business model. I don't even know why you throw the term feminist around in that way, since all feminist means is someone who wants equality of the sexes.
There are many example of women running very successful businesses very successfully. Look at Sheryl Sandberg, or Marissa Mayer (Facebook and yahoo respectively). Or even look at Mary Barra who is CEO of General Motors or the woman who runs PepsiCo (whise name escapes me). But there are just 32 companies of the 500 biggest companies in America that are run by women. You cannot say with hand on heart that you think that in 468 instances out of 500 men were objectively better than women. It's due to there being bias throughout the junior, middle and senior management of these companies. Bias that has had an effect for decades, leading to less opportunity throughout the organisation.
As for the 'don't stand around moaning' bit - as I said, it's not about me, I sit on the board of FTSE companies Mo, and sat on the board of global companies when I was an exec. That's why I know what happens. What's your experience of this, outside watching YouTube videos? When have you been senior enough to understand the factors at play here? Because big companies now recognise the issue and are working really hard to try to do something about it. To redress the impact that decades of this sort of bias have caused. Because they know damn well (as they can see it happen) that mixed genders at senior levels lead to companies performing better. |
Let me see if I get this straight, Lisa - you're a SJW with a heart of gold, but you accumulated your wealth by working for financial institutions in London, the shadiest and most corrupt businesses on the planet?
The same institutions that have built their vast empires on the backs of ripping off the common folk to truly staggering degrees? Ever heard of LIBOR or the Global Laundromat or the Panama Papers or the global meltdown a decade ago (and so on and so forth)? Yes, I'm sure you know them well. Possibly had a part to play in some of these, maybe?
Anyway, point being you can't wage war on your pet social inequities while further deepening the financial inequities that control it all. To do so would rightly expose you to accusations of hypocrisy, don't you think? As the poet Sir Method Man of the Clan known as Wu-Tang famously said, "Cash rules everything around me." And it quite obviously does.
Not sure what boards you have specifically been on, but I am certain the unscrupulous business practices of the companies of the FTSE, etc. have taken far more money (i.e. livelihood) away from women than any supposed pay gap, solely because of their gender, ever could.
Where did you hear Sanches didn't cost us over £7m, by the way?? |  | | |
| PC bollo*cks gone mad with John Humphreys on 16:01 - Jan 27 with 2868 views | Mo_Wives |
| PC bollo*cks gone mad with John Humphreys on 15:37 - Jan 27 by Nirvana |
Let me see if I get this straight, Lisa - you're a SJW with a heart of gold, but you accumulated your wealth by working for financial institutions in London, the shadiest and most corrupt businesses on the planet?
The same institutions that have built their vast empires on the backs of ripping off the common folk to truly staggering degrees? Ever heard of LIBOR or the Global Laundromat or the Panama Papers or the global meltdown a decade ago (and so on and so forth)? Yes, I'm sure you know them well. Possibly had a part to play in some of these, maybe?
Anyway, point being you can't wage war on your pet social inequities while further deepening the financial inequities that control it all. To do so would rightly expose you to accusations of hypocrisy, don't you think? As the poet Sir Method Man of the Clan known as Wu-Tang famously said, "Cash rules everything around me." And it quite obviously does.
Not sure what boards you have specifically been on, but I am certain the unscrupulous business practices of the companies of the FTSE, etc. have taken far more money (i.e. livelihood) away from women than any supposed pay gap, solely because of their gender, ever could.
Where did you hear Sanches didn't cost us over £7m, by the way?? |
"Not sure what boards you have specifically been on..."
Only joking | |
| |
| PC bollo*cks gone mad with John Humphreys on 16:03 - Jan 27 with 2862 views | londonlisa2001 |
| PC bollo*cks gone mad with John Humphreys on 15:37 - Jan 27 by Nirvana |
Let me see if I get this straight, Lisa - you're a SJW with a heart of gold, but you accumulated your wealth by working for financial institutions in London, the shadiest and most corrupt businesses on the planet?
The same institutions that have built their vast empires on the backs of ripping off the common folk to truly staggering degrees? Ever heard of LIBOR or the Global Laundromat or the Panama Papers or the global meltdown a decade ago (and so on and so forth)? Yes, I'm sure you know them well. Possibly had a part to play in some of these, maybe?
Anyway, point being you can't wage war on your pet social inequities while further deepening the financial inequities that control it all. To do so would rightly expose you to accusations of hypocrisy, don't you think? As the poet Sir Method Man of the Clan known as Wu-Tang famously said, "Cash rules everything around me." And it quite obviously does.
Not sure what boards you have specifically been on, but I am certain the unscrupulous business practices of the companies of the FTSE, etc. have taken far more money (i.e. livelihood) away from women than any supposed pay gap, solely because of their gender, ever could.
Where did you hear Sanches didn't cost us over £7m, by the way?? |
Let me see if can get this straight Nirvana.
I'm not what you term an SJW, I have never worked for what you term a financial institution, I have indeed heard of LIBOR, Panama Papers and so on and so forth and it's none of your business where I've heard or not heard anything.
Off you trot. | | | |
| PC bollo*cks gone mad with John Humphreys on 16:07 - Jan 27 with 2852 views | perchrockjack |
And we have to take your word Lisa as we know nothing about you, as you do me and others | |
| |
| |
By continuing to use the site, you agree to our use of cookies and to abide by our Terms and Conditions.
