| Britain is overreacting to Omicron 19:25 - Dec 15 with 11863 views | 73__73 |
DR Angelique Coetzee. No doubt the vaccination and lockdown zealots will call her a nutter etc. |  |
| |  |
| Britain is overreacting to Omicron on 00:24 - Jan 16 with 1372 views | Brynmill_Jack |
| Britain is overreacting to Omicron on 17:27 - Jan 15 by 73__73 |
Where is the professor. He seems to have gone into hiding since his prophecies of doom failed to materialise. |
His deputy Scotia is in control. Well sort of |  |
| Each time I go to Bedd - au........................ |
| |
| Britain is overreacting to Omicron on 09:12 - Jan 16 with 1323 views | Scotia |
| Britain is overreacting to Omicron on 22:16 - Jan 15 by A_Fans_Dad |
In response to this comment "One SPI-B scientist told Ms Dodsworth: “In March [2020] the Government was very worried about compliance and they thought people wouldn’t want to be locked down. There were discussions about fear being needed to encourage compliance, and decisions were made about how to ramp up the fear. The way we have used fear is dystopian."
"Steve Baker, the deputy chairman of the Covid Recovery Group of Tory MPs, said: “If it is true that the state took the decision to terrify the public to get compliance with rules, that raises extremely serious questions about the type of society we want to become.
“If we’re being really honest, do I fear that Government policy today is playing into the roots of totalitarianism? Yes, of course it is.”" |
So you can't find anything then?
That's the opinion of a back bench MP not an admission.
Who in the government admitted to using scare tactic propaganda?
You accused me of lying, I demonstrated I wasn't. You've had about 5 attempts now and you still can't do the same. | | | |
| Britain is overreacting to Omicron on 09:20 - Jan 16 with 1320 views | Scotia |
| Britain is overreacting to Omicron on 13:47 - Jan 15 by 73__73 |
Haven’t you seen what’s been happening in wales, Scotland and NI, not forgetting mask wearing being compulsory in England and work from home mandates.
Have you been asleep for the last month ? |
Mask wearing and working from home is not an overreaction.
Wales and the others has overreacted, probably with best intentions, but restrictions should have been dropped by now. | | | |
| Britain is overreacting to Omicron on 10:22 - Jan 16 with 1310 views | Brynmill_Jack |
| Britain is overreacting to Omicron on 09:12 - Jan 16 by Scotia |
So you can't find anything then?
That's the opinion of a back bench MP not an admission.
Who in the government admitted to using scare tactic propaganda?
You accused me of lying, I demonstrated I wasn't. You've had about 5 attempts now and you still can't do the same. |
Is anyone going to come clean and say “yeah , we used psychological scare tactics to influence people to become compliant”? Really?
I think you have to look at the effects on people during lockdown - neighbours keeping tabs on what the other was doing, complete paranoia everywhere, demonization of people for minor things etc.
That definitely happened so it’s not inconceivable to say that government could have utilised tactics of that nature. | |
| Each time I go to Bedd - au........................ |
| |
| Britain is overreacting to Omicron on 10:55 - Jan 16 with 1278 views | controversial_jack |
If modelling for the worse covid scenario is so wrong, let's stop doing it for climate change and just ignore it and carry on consuming fossils as we wish | | | |
| Britain is overreacting to Omicron on 11:25 - Jan 16 with 1280 views | JACKMANANDBOY |
| Britain is overreacting to Omicron on 10:55 - Jan 16 by controversial_jack |
If modelling for the worse covid scenario is so wrong, let's stop doing it for climate change and just ignore it and carry on consuming fossils as we wish |
Modelling the worst case scenario is futile. The worst case scenario for all of us is that we will get hit by a bus today so......stay in bed.
We need probable scenarios based on good knowledge and insight from real world studies and previous epidemics. For example the Spanish, Hong Kong and Asian flu all peaked after about two years following the emergence of a weaker strain |  |
| |
| Britain is overreacting to Omicron on 14:15 - Jan 16 with 1253 views | A_Fans_Dad |
| Britain is overreacting to Omicron on 10:55 - Jan 16 by controversial_jack |
If modelling for the worse covid scenario is so wrong, let's stop doing it for climate change and just ignore it and carry on consuming fossils as we wish |
Yes. | | | |
| Britain is overreacting to Omicron on 15:13 - Jan 16 with 1242 views | A_Fans_Dad |
| Britain is overreacting to Omicron on 09:12 - Jan 16 by Scotia |
So you can't find anything then?
That's the opinion of a back bench MP not an admission.
Who in the government admitted to using scare tactic propaganda?
You accused me of lying, I demonstrated I wasn't. You've had about 5 attempts now and you still can't do the same. |
The problem is you ignore anything I post by finding a reason not to accept it.
Take the 200,000 Javid rebuke by the Office for Statistics Regulation (OSR).
You appear to think it was the OSR that was admitting to lying when it was Javid and his department the UK Health Security Agency (UKHSA).
They used models instead of the real numbers and were roundly critisized for scare-mongering.
Instead of 200,000 they announced it was actually 81,815 on the 13th and 95,063 on the 14th.
This is a repeat of Hancock and the PHE who had to admit that they were exaggerating (another name for lying) the Mortality figures by including everybody who died after testing positive, regardless of how much later. After complaints by other MPs he had to have a review and issue new guidelines to only include those who died after 28 days. Which is still wrong.
You have a complete history of using the same tactic of ignoring the message and picking on the minor details to misdirect or just plain outright lying and deny information exists.
Remember NASA/GISS temperature Adjustments when their own graphs show the adjustments they made?
How about Dr Martin and Vaccine and COVID Patents agreed to be real and owned by NIH and NIAID personnel?
Or Dr Malone and his mRNA investigative work when you were shown his papers earlier than anybody you said developed it.
HCQ doesn't work when it does as shown by many studies and admitted by the US goverment documents that showed they knew back in April 2020.
The same for Ivermectin.
Or 6 dead bodies not being worse than 3 dead bodies.
Or Natural Immunity preventing some people from getting COVID when everybody around them do. Or that natural immunity prevents them getting ill or reduces their symptoms.
Or 100% Vaccine efficacy against hospitalisation when 2800 people had already died of COVID which leads us on to negative Vaccine efficacy where double and triple vaxxed are more likely to get COVID, which data from Israel, Germany, Netherlands and the UK all confirm.
The UK Case data using the standard Efficacy calculation show.
Under 18s = 38% look positive efficacy from the vaccine.
18-29 = -122%
30-30 = -137%
40-49 = -151%
50-59 = -117%
60-69 = -89%
70-79 = -56%
80+ = -7.5% [Post edited 16 Jan 2022 15:17]
| | | |
Login to get fewer ads
| Britain is overreacting to Omicron on 22:05 - Jan 16 with 1184 views | Scotia |
| Britain is overreacting to Omicron on 10:22 - Jan 16 by Brynmill_Jack |
Is anyone going to come clean and say “yeah , we used psychological scare tactics to influence people to become compliant”? Really?
I think you have to look at the effects on people during lockdown - neighbours keeping tabs on what the other was doing, complete paranoia everywhere, demonization of people for minor things etc.
That definitely happened so it’s not inconceivable to say that government could have utilised tactics of that nature. |
Of course they aren't, I don't think the government has they've based some decisions on the modelled worst case scenario. Up until omicron. Really the government had little choice.
Those models are all in the public domain, much of the "psychological scare tactics" have been click bait in the media. | | | |
| Britain is overreacting to Omicron on 22:17 - Jan 16 with 1179 views | Scotia |
| Britain is overreacting to Omicron on 15:13 - Jan 16 by A_Fans_Dad |
The problem is you ignore anything I post by finding a reason not to accept it.
Take the 200,000 Javid rebuke by the Office for Statistics Regulation (OSR).
You appear to think it was the OSR that was admitting to lying when it was Javid and his department the UK Health Security Agency (UKHSA).
They used models instead of the real numbers and were roundly critisized for scare-mongering.
Instead of 200,000 they announced it was actually 81,815 on the 13th and 95,063 on the 14th.
This is a repeat of Hancock and the PHE who had to admit that they were exaggerating (another name for lying) the Mortality figures by including everybody who died after testing positive, regardless of how much later. After complaints by other MPs he had to have a review and issue new guidelines to only include those who died after 28 days. Which is still wrong.
You have a complete history of using the same tactic of ignoring the message and picking on the minor details to misdirect or just plain outright lying and deny information exists.
Remember NASA/GISS temperature Adjustments when their own graphs show the adjustments they made?
How about Dr Martin and Vaccine and COVID Patents agreed to be real and owned by NIH and NIAID personnel?
Or Dr Malone and his mRNA investigative work when you were shown his papers earlier than anybody you said developed it.
HCQ doesn't work when it does as shown by many studies and admitted by the US goverment documents that showed they knew back in April 2020.
The same for Ivermectin.
Or 6 dead bodies not being worse than 3 dead bodies.
Or Natural Immunity preventing some people from getting COVID when everybody around them do. Or that natural immunity prevents them getting ill or reduces their symptoms.
Or 100% Vaccine efficacy against hospitalisation when 2800 people had already died of COVID which leads us on to negative Vaccine efficacy where double and triple vaxxed are more likely to get COVID, which data from Israel, Germany, Netherlands and the UK all confirm.
The UK Case data using the standard Efficacy calculation show.
Under 18s = 38% look positive efficacy from the vaccine.
18-29 = -122%
30-30 = -137%
40-49 = -151%
50-59 = -117%
60-69 = -89%
70-79 = -56%
80+ = -7.5% [Post edited 16 Jan 2022 15:17]
|
They're not "reasons not to accept" they're inaccurate statements. | | | |
| Britain is overreacting to Omicron on 20:55 - Jan 17 with 1148 views | Brynmill_Jack |
| Britain is overreacting to Omicron on 22:17 - Jan 16 by Scotia |
They're not "reasons not to accept" they're inaccurate statements. |
Well, then you know what to do - counter his argument with data! | |
| Each time I go to Bedd - au........................ |
| |
| Britain is overreacting to Omicron on 21:50 - Jan 17 with 1121 views | A_Fans_Dad |
| Britain is overreacting to Omicron on 20:55 - Jan 17 by Brynmill_Jack |
Well, then you know what to do - counter his argument with data! |
He can't do that for Dr Malone because all he has is his opinion based on msm hit pieces.
The same applies to Dr Martin who's patent analysis has been confirmed by NIH and various grant details etc.g
But that is what he and prof do, they use character assassination and "source" assassination to discredit any argument contrary to their perception, only their sources are acceptable. Even if their source is shown to be wrong. | | | |
| Britain is overreacting to Omicron on 22:03 - Jan 17 with 1114 views | A_Fans_Dad |
Israel study shows that a second booster jab (4th jab) doesn't prevent Omicron infection even though it raises antibodies even higher.
https://www.reuters.com/world/
They haven't figured out yet that antibodies to the wrong part of the virus don't work when the virus has mutated regardless of how high they go. | | | |
| Britain is overreacting to Omicron on 08:15 - Jan 18 with 1078 views | felixstowe_jack |
Good to see that morrisons are going to reduce sick pay for the unvaccinated who have to self isolate if they come into contact with covoid positive people.
Currently vaccinated people do not have to self isolate after they come into close contact and test negative.
While unvaccinated do have to self isolate. Why should unvaccinated people get extra sick leave just because they refuse to get vaccinated.
Can only be good news if this encourages them to get vaccinated. | |
| |
| Britain is overreacting to Omicron on 09:09 - Jan 18 with 1055 views | Scotia |
| Britain is overreacting to Omicron on 20:55 - Jan 17 by Brynmill_Jack |
Well, then you know what to do - counter his argument with data! |
He claimed I was lying. I'm not.
I've called him out on the fact that he accused the government of admitting to using scare tactics. He hasn't done so yet. We're 72 hrs in. | | | |
| Britain is overreacting to Omicron on 09:18 - Jan 18 with 1045 views | Professor |
| Britain is overreacting to Omicron on 17:27 - Jan 15 by 73__73 |
Where is the professor. He seems to have gone into hiding since his prophecies of doom failed to materialise. |
Busy
Shame the 7 day mortality rate has doubled due to Omicron. Never mind, the extra 3000 or so deaths are a drop in the ocean.
Interesting and perhaps irrelevant overall is that case numbers are falling quickest in Wales.
And Malone is still a liar. | | | |
| Britain is overreacting to Omicron on 09:21 - Jan 18 with 1045 views | Scotia |
| Britain is overreacting to Omicron on 21:50 - Jan 17 by A_Fans_Dad |
He can't do that for Dr Malone because all he has is his opinion based on msm hit pieces.
The same applies to Dr Martin who's patent analysis has been confirmed by NIH and various grant details etc.g
But that is what he and prof do, they use character assassination and "source" assassination to discredit any argument contrary to their perception, only their sources are acceptable. Even if their source is shown to be wrong. |
Dr Malone did not invent mRNA vaccines. He did some experiments as an undergrad. He disn't even get his PhD.
The only article that supports his position of being the inventor is written by his wife. That's what he claims he is the sole inventor. He categorically isn't.
It is possible that if he had maintained his involvment he could have been hailed a hero. He didn't and he isn't. Now he is trying to undermine them becasue he is bitter.
Check this out, it demonstrates his minor early involvement and his concern (refuted) that "others got rich of his back"
https://www.nature.com/article | | | |
| Britain is overreacting to Omicron on 14:14 - Jan 18 with 1004 views | A_Fans_Dad |
| Britain is overreacting to Omicron on 09:21 - Jan 18 by Scotia |
Dr Malone did not invent mRNA vaccines. He did some experiments as an undergrad. He disn't even get his PhD.
The only article that supports his position of being the inventor is written by his wife. That's what he claims he is the sole inventor. He categorically isn't.
It is possible that if he had maintained his involvment he could have been hailed a hero. He didn't and he isn't. Now he is trying to undermine them becasue he is bitter.
Check this out, it demonstrates his minor early involvement and his concern (refuted) that "others got rich of his back"
https://www.nature.com/article |
How about you and prof read what he actually did instead of what hit pieces say he did?
How about you pick the bones out of these patents and letters etc he was involved in?
Lipid-mediated polynucleotide administration to deliver a biologically active peptide and to induce a cellular immune response (includes mRNA). P Felgner, JA Wolff, GH Rhodes, R Malone, D Carson. Assigned to Vical, Inc and licensed to Merck. No. 7,250,404, date of issue: 7/31/07 Cited in 105 articles. Priority Date: 3/21/1989.
Lipid-mediated polynucleotide administration to reduce likelihood of subject's becoming infected (includes mRNA). P Felgner, JA Wolff, GH Rhodes, Robert W Malone, D Carson. Assigned to Vical, Inc and licensed to Merck. US Pat. Ser. No. 6,867,195 B1. Date of issue: 3/15/05. Priority Date: 3/21/1989.
Generation of an immune response to a pathogen (includes mRNA). P Felgner, JA Wolff, GH Rhodes, Robert W Malone, D Carson. Assigned to Vical, Inc and licensed to Merck. US Pat. Ser. No. 6,710,035. Date of issue: 3/23/04. Citations: 39 articles. Priority Date: 3/21/1989.
Expression of exogenous polynucleotide sequences in a vertebrate, mammal, fish, bird or human (includes mRNA). P Felgner, JA Wolff, GH Rhodes, Robert W Malone, D Carson. Assigned to Vical, Inc, licensed to Merck. US Pat. Ser. No. 6,673,776. Date of issue: 1/6/04. Priority Date: 3/21/1989.
Methods of delivering a physiologically active polypeptide to a mammal (includes mRNA). P Felgner, JA Wolff, GH Rhodes, Robert W Malone, D Carson. Assigned to Vical, Inc, licensed to Merck. US Pat. Ser. No. 6,413,942. Date of issue: 7/2/02. (cited in 150 articles). Priority Date: 3/21/1989.
Induction of a protective immune response in a mammal by injecting a DNA sequence (includes mRNA). P Felgner, JA Wolff, GH Rhodes, Robert W Malone, D Carson. Assigned to Vical, licensed to Merck. US Pat. Ser. No. 6,214,804, date of issue: 4/10/01. Cited in 360 articles. Priority Date: 3/21/1989.
Induction of a protective immune response in a mammal by injecting a DNA sequence (includes mRNA). P Felgner, JA Wolff, GH Rhodes, Robert W Malone, D Carson. Assigned to Vical, Inc, licensed to Merck. US Pat. Ser. No. 5,589,466. Date of issue: 12/31/96. Cited in 899 articles. Priority Date: 3/21/1989.
Delivery of exogenous DNA sequences in a mammal (includes mRNA). Assigned to Vical, Inc, licensed to Merck. P Felgner, JA Wolff, GH Rhodes, Robert W Malone, D Carson. US Pat. Ser. No. 5,580,859. Date of issue: 12/3/96. Cited in 1244 articles. Priority Date: 3/21/1989.
Generation of antibodies through lipid mediated DNA delivery (includes mRNA). P Felgner, JA Wolff, GH Rhodes, Robert W Malone, D Carson. Assigned to Vical, Inc, licensed to Merck. US Pat. Ser. No. 5,703,055. Date of issue: 12/30/97. Cited in 419 articles. Priority Date: 3/21/1989.
A novel approach to study packaging of retroviral RNA by RNA transfection (Abstract). RW Malone, P. Felgner, I. Verma. RNA Tumor Viruses, May 17-18, 1988. Cold Spring Harbor (the first in a series of papers/abstracts on RNA transfection).
mRNA Transfection of cultured eukaryotic cells and embryos using cationic liposomes. Malone RW. Focus. 1989; 11:61-8
THE VERY FIRST mRNA VACCINE EXPERIMENTAL DATA 1990 (from Vical to patent office)
Cationic liposome-mediated RNA transfection. Malone RW, Felgner PL, Verma IM. Proc Natl Acad Sci (PNAS) U S A. 1989;86(16):6077-81. Cited in 749 articles.
Direct gene transfer into mouse muscle in vivo. Wolff JA, Malone RW, et al. Science. 1990;247(4949 Pt 1):1465-8. Cited in 4,750 articles. Note that Robert was a student at Northwestern, and was never affiliated with University of Wisc.
High levels of messenger RNA expression following cationic liposome mediated transfection tissue cultured cells. Malone R, Kumar R, Felgner P. NIH Conference: “Self-Cleaving RNA as an Anti-HIV Agent (abstract). Washington, DC June 1989.
Cationic liposome-mediated RNA transfection. Dwarki VJ, Malone RW, Verma IM. Methods Enzymol. 1993;217:644-54. Cited in: 102 articles.
Delivery of exogenous DNA (includes mRNA) sequences in a mammal P Felgner, JA Wolff, GH Rhodes, R Malone, D Carson. Biotechnology Advances 1993: 15 (3-4), 763-763
DNA vaccines for eliciting a mucosal immune response (includes mRNA). US Pat. Ser. No. 6,110,898. Inventors: RW Malone and Jill Glasspool Malone. Date of issue: 8/29/00. Cited in 40 articles. Priority Date: 1996.
Formulations and methods for generating active cytofectin: polynucleotide transfection complexes. Robert W Malone, et al. US Pat. Ser. No. 5,925,623 7/20/99.
Cationic Transport Reagents. US Pat. Ser. No. 5,892,071 Robert W Malone, et. al. issued 4/06/99.
Polyfunctional cationic cytofectins, formulations and methods for generating active cytofectin: polynucleotide transfection complexes. Robert W Malone, et. al. US Pat. Ser. No. 5,824,812 issued 10/20/98.
Cationic Transport Reagents. Robert W Malone, et. al. US Pat. Ser. No. 5,744,625 issued 4/28/98.
Cationic Transport Reagents. Robert W Malone, et. al. US Pat. Ser. No. 5,527,928, date of issue: 6/18/96.
Marked enhancement of macaque respiratory tissue transfection by aurintricarboxylic acid. Glasspool-Malone J, …, Malone RW. Gene Med. 2002;4(3):323-2.
Enhancing direct in vivo transfection with nuclease inhibitors and pulsed electrical fields. Glasspool-Malone J, Malone RW. In Gene Therapy Methods: Methods Enzymol. 2002;346:72-91
Cutaneous transfection and immune responses to intradermal nucleic acid vaccination are significantly enhanced by in vivo electropermeabilization. Drabick JJ, Glasspool-Malone J, …, Malone RW. Mol Ther. 2001;3(2):249-55. Cited in 192 articles.
Theory and in vivo application of electroporative gene delivery. Somiari S, Glasspool-Malone J, … Malone RW. Mol Ther. 2000;2(3):178-87. Cited in 345 articles.
Efficient nonviral cutaneous transfection. Glasspool-Malone J, …, Malone RW. Mol Ther. 2000;2(2):140-6. Cited in 138 articles.
Developing dendritic cell polynucleotide vaccination for prostate cancer immunotherapy. Berlyn KA, …, Malone RW J Biotechnol. 1999;73(2-3):155-79
Models of Cationic Liposome Mediated Transfection. Gene Therapy and Molecular Biology. Ahearn A, Malone RW. Vol 4. Gene Therapy and Molecular Biology 1999;4
Cationic lipid-mediated gene delivery to murine lung: correlation of lipid hydration with in vivo transfection activity. Bennett MJ, …, Malone RW, Nantz MH. J Med Chem. 1997;40(25):4069-78
Considerations for the design of improved cationic amphiphile-based transfection reagents. Bennett MJ, …, Malone RW. Journal of Liposome Research 1996;6(3):545-65
Structural and functional analysis of cationic transfection lipids: the hydrophobic domain. Balasubramaniam RP, …, Malone RW. Gene Ther. 1996;3(2):163-72. cited in 172 articles.
A flexible approach to synthetic lipid ammonium salts for polynucleotide transfection. MJ Bennett, RW Malone, MH Nantz. Tetrahedron letters 36 (13), 2207-2210
You two are despicable, vindictive clueless posters who do not do your own research and rely on mass media hit pieces to character assassinate and blacken the name of any and all opposition. [Post edited 18 Jan 2022 16:06]
| | | |
| Britain is overreacting to Omicron on 09:22 - Jan 20 with 944 views | felixstowe_jack |
Another antivaxers convicted of threatening behaviour after abusing two health workers .
The antivaxers say they are protecting the right to choose but threaten health workers and abuse people exercising their right to be vaccinated. | |
| |
| Britain is overreacting to Omicron on 10:42 - Jan 20 with 916 views | Scotia |
| Britain is overreacting to Omicron on 14:14 - Jan 18 by A_Fans_Dad |
How about you and prof read what he actually did instead of what hit pieces say he did?
How about you pick the bones out of these patents and letters etc he was involved in?
Lipid-mediated polynucleotide administration to deliver a biologically active peptide and to induce a cellular immune response (includes mRNA). P Felgner, JA Wolff, GH Rhodes, R Malone, D Carson. Assigned to Vical, Inc and licensed to Merck. No. 7,250,404, date of issue: 7/31/07 Cited in 105 articles. Priority Date: 3/21/1989.
Lipid-mediated polynucleotide administration to reduce likelihood of subject's becoming infected (includes mRNA). P Felgner, JA Wolff, GH Rhodes, Robert W Malone, D Carson. Assigned to Vical, Inc and licensed to Merck. US Pat. Ser. No. 6,867,195 B1. Date of issue: 3/15/05. Priority Date: 3/21/1989.
Generation of an immune response to a pathogen (includes mRNA). P Felgner, JA Wolff, GH Rhodes, Robert W Malone, D Carson. Assigned to Vical, Inc and licensed to Merck. US Pat. Ser. No. 6,710,035. Date of issue: 3/23/04. Citations: 39 articles. Priority Date: 3/21/1989.
Expression of exogenous polynucleotide sequences in a vertebrate, mammal, fish, bird or human (includes mRNA). P Felgner, JA Wolff, GH Rhodes, Robert W Malone, D Carson. Assigned to Vical, Inc, licensed to Merck. US Pat. Ser. No. 6,673,776. Date of issue: 1/6/04. Priority Date: 3/21/1989.
Methods of delivering a physiologically active polypeptide to a mammal (includes mRNA). P Felgner, JA Wolff, GH Rhodes, Robert W Malone, D Carson. Assigned to Vical, Inc, licensed to Merck. US Pat. Ser. No. 6,413,942. Date of issue: 7/2/02. (cited in 150 articles). Priority Date: 3/21/1989.
Induction of a protective immune response in a mammal by injecting a DNA sequence (includes mRNA). P Felgner, JA Wolff, GH Rhodes, Robert W Malone, D Carson. Assigned to Vical, licensed to Merck. US Pat. Ser. No. 6,214,804, date of issue: 4/10/01. Cited in 360 articles. Priority Date: 3/21/1989.
Induction of a protective immune response in a mammal by injecting a DNA sequence (includes mRNA). P Felgner, JA Wolff, GH Rhodes, Robert W Malone, D Carson. Assigned to Vical, Inc, licensed to Merck. US Pat. Ser. No. 5,589,466. Date of issue: 12/31/96. Cited in 899 articles. Priority Date: 3/21/1989.
Delivery of exogenous DNA sequences in a mammal (includes mRNA). Assigned to Vical, Inc, licensed to Merck. P Felgner, JA Wolff, GH Rhodes, Robert W Malone, D Carson. US Pat. Ser. No. 5,580,859. Date of issue: 12/3/96. Cited in 1244 articles. Priority Date: 3/21/1989.
Generation of antibodies through lipid mediated DNA delivery (includes mRNA). P Felgner, JA Wolff, GH Rhodes, Robert W Malone, D Carson. Assigned to Vical, Inc, licensed to Merck. US Pat. Ser. No. 5,703,055. Date of issue: 12/30/97. Cited in 419 articles. Priority Date: 3/21/1989.
A novel approach to study packaging of retroviral RNA by RNA transfection (Abstract). RW Malone, P. Felgner, I. Verma. RNA Tumor Viruses, May 17-18, 1988. Cold Spring Harbor (the first in a series of papers/abstracts on RNA transfection).
mRNA Transfection of cultured eukaryotic cells and embryos using cationic liposomes. Malone RW. Focus. 1989; 11:61-8
THE VERY FIRST mRNA VACCINE EXPERIMENTAL DATA 1990 (from Vical to patent office)
Cationic liposome-mediated RNA transfection. Malone RW, Felgner PL, Verma IM. Proc Natl Acad Sci (PNAS) U S A. 1989;86(16):6077-81. Cited in 749 articles.
Direct gene transfer into mouse muscle in vivo. Wolff JA, Malone RW, et al. Science. 1990;247(4949 Pt 1):1465-8. Cited in 4,750 articles. Note that Robert was a student at Northwestern, and was never affiliated with University of Wisc.
High levels of messenger RNA expression following cationic liposome mediated transfection tissue cultured cells. Malone R, Kumar R, Felgner P. NIH Conference: “Self-Cleaving RNA as an Anti-HIV Agent (abstract). Washington, DC June 1989.
Cationic liposome-mediated RNA transfection. Dwarki VJ, Malone RW, Verma IM. Methods Enzymol. 1993;217:644-54. Cited in: 102 articles.
Delivery of exogenous DNA (includes mRNA) sequences in a mammal P Felgner, JA Wolff, GH Rhodes, R Malone, D Carson. Biotechnology Advances 1993: 15 (3-4), 763-763
DNA vaccines for eliciting a mucosal immune response (includes mRNA). US Pat. Ser. No. 6,110,898. Inventors: RW Malone and Jill Glasspool Malone. Date of issue: 8/29/00. Cited in 40 articles. Priority Date: 1996.
Formulations and methods for generating active cytofectin: polynucleotide transfection complexes. Robert W Malone, et al. US Pat. Ser. No. 5,925,623 7/20/99.
Cationic Transport Reagents. US Pat. Ser. No. 5,892,071 Robert W Malone, et. al. issued 4/06/99.
Polyfunctional cationic cytofectins, formulations and methods for generating active cytofectin: polynucleotide transfection complexes. Robert W Malone, et. al. US Pat. Ser. No. 5,824,812 issued 10/20/98.
Cationic Transport Reagents. Robert W Malone, et. al. US Pat. Ser. No. 5,744,625 issued 4/28/98.
Cationic Transport Reagents. Robert W Malone, et. al. US Pat. Ser. No. 5,527,928, date of issue: 6/18/96.
Marked enhancement of macaque respiratory tissue transfection by aurintricarboxylic acid. Glasspool-Malone J, …, Malone RW. Gene Med. 2002;4(3):323-2.
Enhancing direct in vivo transfection with nuclease inhibitors and pulsed electrical fields. Glasspool-Malone J, Malone RW. In Gene Therapy Methods: Methods Enzymol. 2002;346:72-91
Cutaneous transfection and immune responses to intradermal nucleic acid vaccination are significantly enhanced by in vivo electropermeabilization. Drabick JJ, Glasspool-Malone J, …, Malone RW. Mol Ther. 2001;3(2):249-55. Cited in 192 articles.
Theory and in vivo application of electroporative gene delivery. Somiari S, Glasspool-Malone J, … Malone RW. Mol Ther. 2000;2(3):178-87. Cited in 345 articles.
Efficient nonviral cutaneous transfection. Glasspool-Malone J, …, Malone RW. Mol Ther. 2000;2(2):140-6. Cited in 138 articles.
Developing dendritic cell polynucleotide vaccination for prostate cancer immunotherapy. Berlyn KA, …, Malone RW J Biotechnol. 1999;73(2-3):155-79
Models of Cationic Liposome Mediated Transfection. Gene Therapy and Molecular Biology. Ahearn A, Malone RW. Vol 4. Gene Therapy and Molecular Biology 1999;4
Cationic lipid-mediated gene delivery to murine lung: correlation of lipid hydration with in vivo transfection activity. Bennett MJ, …, Malone RW, Nantz MH. J Med Chem. 1997;40(25):4069-78
Considerations for the design of improved cationic amphiphile-based transfection reagents. Bennett MJ, …, Malone RW. Journal of Liposome Research 1996;6(3):545-65
Structural and functional analysis of cationic transfection lipids: the hydrophobic domain. Balasubramaniam RP, …, Malone RW. Gene Ther. 1996;3(2):163-72. cited in 172 articles.
A flexible approach to synthetic lipid ammonium salts for polynucleotide transfection. MJ Bennett, RW Malone, MH Nantz. Tetrahedron letters 36 (13), 2207-2210
You two are despicable, vindictive clueless posters who do not do your own research and rely on mass media hit pieces to character assassinate and blacken the name of any and all opposition. [Post edited 18 Jan 2022 16:06]
|
That demonstrates what has already been said. He had a minor involvement - BUT DIDN'T EVEN COMPLETE A RELEVANT PhD.
He claims he invented mRNA vaccines. Single handedly. The naming convention in those publications suggets he played a relatively junior role. If he led the study his name would be first or last, in the vast majority of those publications his name is in the middle.
If you actully understood what you post you'd realise that you've just proved the opposite of what you and Dr Malone claim. | | | |
| Britain is overreacting to Omicron on 14:39 - Jan 20 with 893 views | A_Fans_Dad |
| Britain is overreacting to Omicron on 10:42 - Jan 20 by Scotia |
That demonstrates what has already been said. He had a minor involvement - BUT DIDN'T EVEN COMPLETE A RELEVANT PhD.
He claims he invented mRNA vaccines. Single handedly. The naming convention in those publications suggets he played a relatively junior role. If he led the study his name would be first or last, in the vast majority of those publications his name is in the middle.
If you actully understood what you post you'd realise that you've just proved the opposite of what you and Dr Malone claim. |
So you say. | | | |
| Britain is overreacting to Omicron on 15:36 - Jan 20 with 873 views | A_Fans_Dad |
| Britain is overreacting to Omicron on 10:42 - Jan 20 by Scotia |
That demonstrates what has already been said. He had a minor involvement - BUT DIDN'T EVEN COMPLETE A RELEVANT PhD.
He claims he invented mRNA vaccines. Single handedly. The naming convention in those publications suggets he played a relatively junior role. If he led the study his name would be first or last, in the vast majority of those publications his name is in the middle.
If you actully understood what you post you'd realise that you've just proved the opposite of what you and Dr Malone claim. |
"BUT DIDN'T EVEN COMPLETE A RELEVANT PhD. "
What do you call a "relevant degree"? | | | |
| Britain is overreacting to Omicron on 15:41 - Jan 20 with 868 views | Scotia |
| Britain is overreacting to Omicron on 15:36 - Jan 20 by A_Fans_Dad |
"BUT DIDN'T EVEN COMPLETE A RELEVANT PhD. "
What do you call a "relevant degree"? |
He didn't complete the PhD he was studying for when he claims he came up with these "discoveries". He forgot to mention that on the Joe Rogan podcast for some reason.
He's not a research scientist to speak of but a medical Dr. | | | |
| Britain is overreacting to Omicron on 19:54 - Jan 20 with 857 views | A_Fans_Dad |
| Britain is overreacting to Omicron on 15:41 - Jan 20 by Scotia |
He didn't complete the PhD he was studying for when he claims he came up with these "discoveries". He forgot to mention that on the Joe Rogan podcast for some reason.
He's not a research scientist to speak of but a medical Dr. |
How do you know what he was studying for while he was doing that research?
It is very odd that you hold Prof in such high regard because he has a Phd and an Msc, however as he says he has been involved in 130 odd papers on mostly Chickens with very few citation of the papers by other researchers.
Then we have Dr Malone who has a Phd in Medicine who you say is a nobody who was involved in 90 odd papers on Human Medicine, many with citations in other papers numbering in the hundreds for each one.
Yet you hold that contribution to human medicine in disdain. | | | |
| |
By continuing to use the site, you agree to our use of cookies and to abide by our Terms and Conditions.