| Just Ignore Her 08:06 - Aug 2 with 5154 views | union_jack |
Well said Liz Truss. You get my vote.
🇬🇧🇬🇧🇬🇧 |  |
| |  |
| Just Ignore Her on 08:38 - Aug 3 with 908 views | Kilkennyjack |
| Just Ignore Her on 08:30 - Aug 3 by onehunglow |
OHL pointed out HAD SAVILLE BEEN A LABOUR CANDIDATE...
I'll leave it there .I'm just too nice a guy to kick a fella fan when down. |
‘If’ and ‘had’ in this context mean the same.
They both pose the question.
My point is the example you used was a Tory, so a strange choice.
On balance, I accept that you just picked a strange example.
You need to accept Savile was a Tory. |  |
| Beware of the Risen People
|
| |
| Just Ignore Her on 08:41 - Aug 3 with 884 views | Kilkennyjack |
| Just Ignore Her on 08:38 - Aug 3 by CountyJim |
No you insinuated that labour could put paedophiles as candidates
You really are sinking to low depths |
Which is the very deliberate choice of Savile ….
I was being as kind as i could be without letting the proposed association go without correction…. | |
| Beware of the Risen People
|
| |
| Just Ignore Her on 08:42 - Aug 3 with 882 views | onehunglow |
| Just Ignore Her on 08:38 - Aug 3 by Kilkennyjack |
‘If’ and ‘had’ in this context mean the same.
They both pose the question.
My point is the example you used was a Tory, so a strange choice.
On balance, I accept that you just picked a strange example.
You need to accept Savile was a Tory. |
I do.
I am not a dumbo Jimbo.
Now read it again and reassess. Life is short and one of us could lose the will to live with much more of this garbage.
In many areas of south Wales,the individual candidate is simply irrelevant.Many will vote never ever remembering the person they voted for.
.
Here's something to ponder on this nice day.
There was not a Labour controlled Liverpool council until 1958
Over the water,on Wirral,most parts outside Birkenhead were rock old Conservative. |  |
| |
| Just Ignore Her on 08:44 - Aug 3 with 880 views | felixstowe_jack |
| Just Ignore Her on 08:38 - Aug 3 by Kilkennyjack |
‘If’ and ‘had’ in this context mean the same.
They both pose the question.
My point is the example you used was a Tory, so a strange choice.
On balance, I accept that you just picked a strange example.
You need to accept Savile was a Tory. |
He was never a Conservative candidate though was he.
He was a big supports of Labour during the Tony Blair government he just seemed to get photographed with anyone in power including Tony Blair. | |
| |
| Just Ignore Her on 08:46 - Aug 3 with 879 views | onehunglow |
| Just Ignore Her on 08:44 - Aug 3 by felixstowe_jack |
He was never a Conservative candidate though was he.
He was a big supports of Labour during the Tony Blair government he just seemed to get photographed with anyone in power including Tony Blair. |
Felix.
Why is it Labour zealots simply refuse to read what is in front of them | |
| |
| Just Ignore Her on 08:50 - Aug 3 with 876 views | BryanSwan |
| Just Ignore Her on 08:33 - Aug 3 by onehunglow |
Not sure abhorrent is a word to describe her,although with you being Labour stalwart it probably is.
It's the dfference between many Tories and Labour.
Labour think its ok to use any pejorative at all but mainly "scum" and Tories simply ,too often ,see Labour people as too low down the social scale to bother with .They wont even slag them off in many cases.
Look at the state we're in |
It's funny how you have to make up facts about people in order to have a point, I've not once voted for Labour in my life. So i must be a pretty terrible stalwart.
What words would you prefer i use to describe someone so morally vscant? | |
| |
| Just Ignore Her on 09:10 - Aug 3 with 872 views | Whiterockin |
I know this is off the original thread. But wasn't Keir Starmer head of the CPS when they decided not to prosecute Saville. Politics aside this was a strange decision. |  | | |
| Just Ignore Her on 09:27 - Aug 3 with 851 views | onehunglow |
| Just Ignore Her on 08:50 - Aug 3 by BryanSwan |
It's funny how you have to make up facts about people in order to have a point, I've not once voted for Labour in my life. So i must be a pretty terrible stalwart.
What words would you prefer i use to describe someone so morally vscant? |
What is vscant?
Get it right mun,is it.
Where have I stated you were a Labour stalwart ?
I know you not from Adam so never make assumptions with me ,mate.
Enjoy this day | |
| |
Login to get fewer ads
| Just Ignore Her on 10:19 - Aug 3 with 829 views | gadgetuk |
| Just Ignore Her on 17:10 - Aug 2 by Dr_Winston |
I think we've only just begun to see the changes in the labour market wrought by the Pandemic. I wouldn't mind betting that a lot more companies offer staff working from home lower wages than those in the office as they don't have the cost of commuting.
Perhaps the smartest move by the Govt has been shifting jobs out of London and the SE to the North and places who could use decently paid, reliable employment. Doing that alone will probably save a fair bit of cash over time as you won't need to pay the "London Weighting" supplement. |
I think you may be right with some companies, however those firms should also consider the fact they need less office space, and that means lower running costs. There is also a benefit where people often work longer hours as they don't have a commute to deal with. | | | |
| Just Ignore Her on 10:23 - Aug 3 with 827 views | waynekerr55 |
| Just Ignore Her on 08:33 - Aug 3 by onehunglow |
Not sure abhorrent is a word to describe her,although with you being Labour stalwart it probably is.
It's the dfference between many Tories and Labour.
Labour think its ok to use any pejorative at all but mainly "scum" and Tories simply ,too often ,see Labour people as too low down the social scale to bother with .They wont even slag them off in many cases.
Look at the state we're in |
She's disingenuous and in hock with the ERG loons. Very, very dangerous times OHL. |  |
| |
| Just Ignore Her on 10:26 - Aug 3 with 826 views | CountyJim |
| Just Ignore Her on 08:46 - Aug 3 by onehunglow |
Felix.
Why is it Labour zealots simply refuse to read what is in front of them |
You can always tell when someone is trying to dig themselves out when they call on others to help |  | | |
| Just Ignore Her on 11:06 - Aug 3 with 813 views | BryanSwan |
| Just Ignore Her on 09:27 - Aug 3 by onehunglow |
What is vscant?
Get it right mun,is it.
Where have I stated you were a Labour stalwart ?
I know you not from Adam so never make assumptions with me ,mate.
Enjoy this day |
"Not sure abhorrent is a word to describe her,although with you being Labour stalwart it probably is."
This is what you said.
No assumptions just facts. | |
| |
| Just Ignore Her on 11:53 - Aug 3 with 781 views | Kilkennyjack |
| Just Ignore Her on 08:44 - Aug 3 by felixstowe_jack |
He was never a Conservative candidate though was he.
He was a big supports of Labour during the Tony Blair government he just seemed to get photographed with anyone in power including Tony Blair. |
No he was never a candidate.
He was however a Tory supporter.
| |
| Beware of the Risen People
|
| |
| Just Ignore Her on 11:54 - Aug 3 with 779 views | Kilkennyjack |
| Just Ignore Her on 10:26 - Aug 3 by CountyJim |
You can always tell when someone is trying to dig themselves out when they call on others to help |
🤣 | |
| Beware of the Risen People
|
| |
| Just Ignore Her on 12:32 - Aug 3 with 755 views | onehunglow |
| Just Ignore Her on 10:23 - Aug 3 by waynekerr55 |
She's disingenuous and in hock with the ERG loons. Very, very dangerous times OHL. |
I dunno mate.
Times like these | |
| |
| Just Ignore Her on 19:12 - Aug 3 with 688 views | waynekerr55 |
| Just Ignore Her on 09:10 - Aug 3 by Whiterockin |
I know this is off the original thread. But wasn't Keir Starmer head of the CPS when they decided not to prosecute Saville. Politics aside this was a strange decision. |
This has been done to death. Full fact explain it well | |
| |
| Just Ignore Her on 20:21 - Aug 3 with 651 views | onehunglow |
| Just Ignore Her on 19:12 - Aug 3 by waynekerr55 |
This has been done to death. Full fact explain it well |
In fairness,so has Saville. | |
| |
| Just Ignore Her on 20:33 - Aug 3 with 636 views | waynekerr55 |
| Just Ignore Her on 20:21 - Aug 3 by onehunglow |
In fairness,so has Saville. |
Oh ffs | |
| |
| Just Ignore Her on 20:35 - Aug 3 with 634 views | onehunglow |
Ive lost count the number of time Saville is brought into arguments purely to fuel Tory hate.
He and Gary Blubyy Glitter.
It' s not right ;it's not appropriate and this site doesn't need it.
FFS. | |
| |
| Just Ignore Her on 20:39 - Aug 3 with 633 views | Sirjohnalot |
| Just Ignore Her on 09:10 - Aug 3 by Whiterockin |
I know this is off the original thread. But wasn't Keir Starmer head of the CPS when they decided not to prosecute Saville. Politics aside this was a strange decision. |
That’s not how it works, it would have been dealt with by the Reviewing Lawyer and possibly a Level D prosecutor. At the point of CPS consideration, there would not have been the evidence sufficient to charge him, lack of witnesses eg. Bear in mind most of the evidence came out after he died.
There is no way at all would the CPS have made any kind of political decision nor would they have been leant upon. These are independent lawyers, they’d not have give a damn who the person was, the decision would have been made on the evidence and it would have had absolutely nothing to do with Starmer. Johnson knew that and what’s more he would not have said it outside of Parliamentary privilege.
Starmer is a very decent man |  | | |
| Just Ignore Her on 20:45 - Aug 3 with 616 views | Whiterockin |
| Just Ignore Her on 20:39 - Aug 3 by Sirjohnalot |
That’s not how it works, it would have been dealt with by the Reviewing Lawyer and possibly a Level D prosecutor. At the point of CPS consideration, there would not have been the evidence sufficient to charge him, lack of witnesses eg. Bear in mind most of the evidence came out after he died.
There is no way at all would the CPS have made any kind of political decision nor would they have been leant upon. These are independent lawyers, they’d not have give a damn who the person was, the decision would have been made on the evidence and it would have had absolutely nothing to do with Starmer. Johnson knew that and what’s more he would not have said it outside of Parliamentary privilege.
Starmer is a very decent man |
I have a lot of respect for you but you seem very keen on jumping to Starmers defence continually, nobody is that perfect. | | | |
| Just Ignore Her on 20:59 - Aug 3 with 596 views | Kilkennyjack |
| Just Ignore Her on 20:35 - Aug 3 by onehunglow |
Ive lost count the number of time Saville is brought into arguments purely to fuel Tory hate.
He and Gary Blubyy Glitter.
It' s not right ;it's not appropriate and this site doesn't need it.
FFS. |
With all due respect, it was you yourself who introduced these names into this thread.
20:15 on August 02nd refers.
Others, myself included, have just commented back.
🤷â€â™‚ï¸ [Post edited 3 Aug 2022 21:00]
| |
| Beware of the Risen People
|
| |
| Just Ignore Her on 20:59 - Aug 3 with 596 views | Sirjohnalot |
| Just Ignore Her on 20:45 - Aug 3 by Whiterockin |
I have a lot of respect for you but you seem very keen on jumping to Starmers defence continually, nobody is that perfect. |
He did a lot for a mate of mine from a very poor background when he was in the same chambers and has helped a lot of people for free too.
I don’t know if he’d make a good PM or not, he may be weak, I’ve no idea, but he’s a decent man. | | | |
| Just Ignore Her on 21:18 - Aug 3 with 572 views | Whiterockin |
| Just Ignore Her on 20:59 - Aug 3 by Sirjohnalot |
He did a lot for a mate of mine from a very poor background when he was in the same chambers and has helped a lot of people for free too.
I don’t know if he’d make a good PM or not, he may be weak, I’ve no idea, but he’s a decent man. |
Excellent response and explains your support for him. | | | |
| Just Ignore Her on 09:47 - Aug 4 with 504 views | onehunglow |
| Just Ignore Her on 20:59 - Aug 3 by Kilkennyjack |
With all due respect, it was you yourself who introduced these names into this thread.
20:15 on August 02nd refers.
Others, myself included, have just commented back.
🤷â€â™‚ï¸ [Post edited 3 Aug 2022 21:00]
|
That's fair comment and I have to fall on my sword on that one but the sentiments remain the same.
I'm as traumatised as all of us by that piece of Yorkshire evil. | |
| |
| |
By continuing to use the site, you agree to our use of cookies and to abide by our Terms and Conditions.
