| Trumpet trying to avoid the truth on 08:36 - Nov 12 with 916 views | Kilkennyjack |
Why might he not want to cooperate i wonder …. ?
And on Tuesday, US District Judge Tanya Chutkan rejected Mr Trump's argument, writing in a 39-page decision: "Presidents are not kings, and Plaintiff is not President."
🤴🇺🇸 |  |
| Beware of the Risen People
|
|  |
| Trumpet trying to avoid the truth on 09:01 - Nov 12 with 909 views | majorraglan |
| Trumpet trying to avoid the truth on 08:36 - Nov 12 by Kilkennyjack |
Why might he not want to cooperate i wonder …. ?
And on Tuesday, US District Judge Tanya Chutkan rejected Mr Trump's argument, writing in a 39-page decision: "Presidents are not kings, and Plaintiff is not President."
🤴🇺🇸 |
But his continuous litigation is delaying the review and he’s hoping to stall it until next year when he hopes the Republicans will take back control of the House which is entirely possible given the current standing of the Democrats and the redrawing of boundaries and changes to voting legislation. |  | | |
| Trumpet trying to avoid the truth on 09:39 - Nov 12 with 880 views | Catullus |
Back when this happened people were sticking up for Trump, saying he didn't arrange it or encourage it. I had a disagreement about that.
Hey Dr P, weren't you one of those people?
It would be hilarious if there was actually proof that he knew about it in advance, even more hilarious if there is proof he encouraged it.
Trump is dangerous. There are things he got right but they were mostly foreign policy things and I haven't a clue how he didn't cause a war with his confrontational attitude. He certainly caused a war on home soil though. | |
| |
| Trumpet trying to avoid the truth on 10:10 - Nov 12 with 868 views | Lohengrin |
| Trumpet trying to avoid the truth on 09:39 - Nov 12 by Catullus |
Back when this happened people were sticking up for Trump, saying he didn't arrange it or encourage it. I had a disagreement about that.
Hey Dr P, weren't you one of those people?
It would be hilarious if there was actually proof that he knew about it in advance, even more hilarious if there is proof he encouraged it.
Trump is dangerous. There are things he got right but they were mostly foreign policy things and I haven't a clue how he didn't cause a war with his confrontational attitude. He certainly caused a war on home soil though. |
For what it’s worth I don’t think he arranged anything but by his own words on the dais he certainly jollied it along...then he ran away.
Nor do I think for one minute the event was a genuine ‘insurrection,’ as the media and Democrats habitually refer to it; if it was casualties would have been in the thousands and rumbled on for days right across the US. |  |
| An idea isn't responsible for those who believe in it. |
| |
| Trumpet trying to avoid the truth on 10:11 - Nov 12 with 865 views | Lohengrin |
| Trumpet trying to avoid the truth on 09:01 - Nov 12 by majorraglan |
But his continuous litigation is delaying the review and he’s hoping to stall it until next year when he hopes the Republicans will take back control of the House which is entirely possible given the current standing of the Democrats and the redrawing of boundaries and changes to voting legislation. |
Is undoubtedly the thinking. | |
| An idea isn't responsible for those who believe in it. |
| |
| Trumpet trying to avoid the truth on 10:22 - Nov 12 with 856 views | Catullus |
| Trumpet trying to avoid the truth on 10:10 - Nov 12 by Lohengrin |
For what it’s worth I don’t think he arranged anything but by his own words on the dais he certainly jollied it along...then he ran away.
Nor do I think for one minute the event was a genuine ‘insurrection,’ as the media and Democrats habitually refer to it; if it was casualties would have been in the thousands and rumbled on for days right across the US. |
I actually don't think he arranged it but he certainly encouraged them to march on Capitol hill. His speech got a worked up crowd even more worked up, they turned into a slavering mob intent on trouble.
I do agree too, that it wasn't a genuine insurrection, for the reasons you give.
Still though, it would be funny to see Trump hung out to dry. It's just a shame the USA is in the same boat as the UK, opposing politicians who are as bad as each other just for different reasons. | |
| |
| Trumpet trying to avoid the truth on 10:29 - Nov 12 with 850 views | Professor |
| Trumpet trying to avoid the truth on 10:10 - Nov 12 by Lohengrin |
For what it’s worth I don’t think he arranged anything but by his own words on the dais he certainly jollied it along...then he ran away.
Nor do I think for one minute the event was a genuine ‘insurrection,’ as the media and Democrats habitually refer to it; if it was casualties would have been in the thousands and rumbled on for days right across the US. |
He certainly 'lit the guns and run on home for his tea'. I'm sure there was a plan of disruption, but not an insurrection. Problem is some clearly did.
I suspect this will be deflected as long as possible. I certainly think both the NY investigation into the Trump Organisation and its financial affairs and the Georgia election interference/fraud/racketeering (delete as you feel appropriate) which has clear and indisputable evidence in the public sphere may prove more problematical to deal with. | | | |
| Trumpet trying to avoid the truth on 10:54 - Nov 12 with 842 views | Dr_Parnassus |
| Trumpet trying to avoid the truth on 09:39 - Nov 12 by Catullus |
Back when this happened people were sticking up for Trump, saying he didn't arrange it or encourage it. I had a disagreement about that.
Hey Dr P, weren't you one of those people?
It would be hilarious if there was actually proof that he knew about it in advance, even more hilarious if there is proof he encouraged it.
Trump is dangerous. There are things he got right but they were mostly foreign policy things and I haven't a clue how he didn't cause a war with his confrontational attitude. He certainly caused a war on home soil though. |
Yep I was, and am one of those.
Ludicrous to suggest he arranged it. Just tin foil hat nonsense that you usually laugh at people for who suggest there was voter fraud etc.
Let’s say for a second he was told it may happen through various intelligence reports… how does that make him liable for it?
Didn’t the Democrat leaders know that there would be riots after them telling people to continue and not to give in? “Fight for our democracy”, encouraging people to donate to a bail fund to bail out rioters… because I did.
Let’s also be honest here, what happened on that day with regards to it being “an insurrection” is just overblown media nonsense.
The majority of it was was people dancing around taking selfies. What we saw for the 12 months previous on a daily basis was far more dangerous, far more damaging and absolutely encouraged by the likes of Kamala Harris and also sitting Democrat State leaders.
It just cannot be argued.
Sorry but I just won’t buy into the hyperbole. [Post edited 12 Nov 2021 11:19]
|  |
| |
Login to get fewer ads
| Trumpet trying to avoid the truth on 11:00 - Nov 12 with 832 views | Dr_Parnassus |
| Trumpet trying to avoid the truth on 10:22 - Nov 12 by Catullus |
I actually don't think he arranged it but he certainly encouraged them to march on Capitol hill. His speech got a worked up crowd even more worked up, they turned into a slavering mob intent on trouble.
I do agree too, that it wasn't a genuine insurrection, for the reasons you give.
Still though, it would be funny to see Trump hung out to dry. It's just a shame the USA is in the same boat as the UK, opposing politicians who are as bad as each other just for different reasons. |
I agree he encouraged people to march, I have always said that. Good on him though as far as I am concerned. What’s wrong with marching?
Isn’t that something we see somewhere on the daily?
Encouraging people to do a constitutionally protected activity is not the same as encouraging people to invade the Capitol building, or anything even remotely similar.
I think you may be seeing what you want to see. | |
| |
| Trumpet trying to avoid the truth on 11:02 - Nov 12 with 832 views | Catullus |
| Trumpet trying to avoid the truth on 10:54 - Nov 12 by Dr_Parnassus |
Yep I was, and am one of those.
Ludicrous to suggest he arranged it. Just tin foil hat nonsense that you usually laugh at people for who suggest there was voter fraud etc.
Let’s say for a second he was told it may happen through various intelligence reports… how does that make him liable for it?
Didn’t the Democrat leaders know that there would be riots after them telling people to continue and not to give in? “Fight for our democracy”, encouraging people to donate to a bail fund to bail out rioters… because I did.
Let’s also be honest here, what happened on that day with regards to it being “an insurrection” is just overblown media nonsense.
The majority of it was was people dancing around taking selfies. What we saw for the 12 months previous on a daily basis was far more dangerous, far more damaging and absolutely encouraged by the likes of Kamala Harris and also sitting Democrat State leaders.
It just cannot be argued.
Sorry but I just won’t buy into the hyperbole. [Post edited 12 Nov 2021 11:19]
|
How does that make him liable? it's very simple, he is liable because if he knew and did nothing then he allowed it to happen.
He could have stood on that dais and told them not to do it. he could have beefed up security, that would have been doing his job.
If he knew about it and did nothing to stop, then stood there urging them to march he is complicit. He is as guilty as anyone else who aids and abets a crime.
That he was POTUS at the time and charged with protecting people makes it even worse. | |
| |
| Trumpet trying to avoid the truth on 11:09 - Nov 12 with 827 views | Dr_Parnassus |
| Trumpet trying to avoid the truth on 11:02 - Nov 12 by Catullus |
How does that make him liable? it's very simple, he is liable because if he knew and did nothing then he allowed it to happen.
He could have stood on that dais and told them not to do it. he could have beefed up security, that would have been doing his job.
If he knew about it and did nothing to stop, then stood there urging them to march he is complicit. He is as guilty as anyone else who aids and abets a crime.
That he was POTUS at the time and charged with protecting people makes it even worse. |
But he didn’t KNOW it was going to happen did he, again that is tin foil hat nonsense.
He may have had intelligence that it “may”, that’s just for arguments sake too, worst case scenario. If the Government tried to stop every single lead they had they wouldn’t have an officers left.
It would be ridiculous to do a speech telling people not to do something that he didn’t know for sure was going to, and of course there would be no way of knowing unless he arranged it personally, which I can’t imagine too many people can try to claim with a straight face.
The Capitol has security and was manned by police. They are the for this exact reason…. To stop it, which they did.
I’m sure you didn’t say Kamala Harris was liable for the riots in September… did you? Yet she directly told them to.
That’s why I can’t buy this nonsense. It’s just partisan, inconsistent and hypocritical nonsense. [Post edited 12 Nov 2021 11:14]
| |
| |
| Trumpet trying to avoid the truth on 11:14 - Nov 12 with 815 views | Kilkennyjack |
| Trumpet trying to avoid the truth on 10:10 - Nov 12 by Lohengrin |
For what it’s worth I don’t think he arranged anything but by his own words on the dais he certainly jollied it along...then he ran away.
Nor do I think for one minute the event was a genuine ‘insurrection,’ as the media and Democrats habitually refer to it; if it was casualties would have been in the thousands and rumbled on for days right across the US. |
Well Loh ….
With respect, I think the definition suggests it was ….
‘Insurrection also falls under the same suite of federal laws as sedition, and the two can be difficult to distinguish. ... It means, essentially, to incite, assist in or engage in a full-on rebellion against the government: a step beyond just conspiring against it, and requiring that significant violence be involved.’
5 people died that day. More injured.
Now it was badly organised, naive, and doomed to certain failure …. but it was Trumps attempt to stop Biden being declared President by any means necessary.
Jail time beckons. | |
| Beware of the Risen People
|
| |
| Trumpet trying to avoid the truth on 11:18 - Nov 12 with 809 views | Dr_Parnassus |
| Trumpet trying to avoid the truth on 11:14 - Nov 12 by Kilkennyjack |
Well Loh ….
With respect, I think the definition suggests it was ….
‘Insurrection also falls under the same suite of federal laws as sedition, and the two can be difficult to distinguish. ... It means, essentially, to incite, assist in or engage in a full-on rebellion against the government: a step beyond just conspiring against it, and requiring that significant violence be involved.’
5 people died that day. More injured.
Now it was badly organised, naive, and doomed to certain failure …. but it was Trumps attempt to stop Biden being declared President by any means necessary.
Jail time beckons. |
25 people died in the Kamala and Biden led riots.
Countless injured. Countless families damaged beyond repair.
Yet she was tweeting to encourage them and also wanted people to donate to a fund to bail these animals out.
Yet you want to blame Trump because he encouraged people to legally march. I repeat… legally.
Nah, not buying it. | |
| |
| Trumpet trying to avoid the truth on 11:21 - Nov 12 with 801 views | Catullus |
| Trumpet trying to avoid the truth on 11:09 - Nov 12 by Dr_Parnassus |
But he didn’t KNOW it was going to happen did he, again that is tin foil hat nonsense.
He may have had intelligence that it “may”, that’s just for arguments sake too, worst case scenario. If the Government tried to stop every single lead they had they wouldn’t have an officers left.
It would be ridiculous to do a speech telling people not to do something that he didn’t know for sure was going to, and of course there would be no way of knowing unless he arranged it personally, which I can’t imagine too many people can try to claim with a straight face.
The Capitol has security and was manned by police. They are the for this exact reason…. To stop it, which they did.
I’m sure you didn’t say Kamala Harris was liable for the riots in September… did you? Yet she directly told them to.
That’s why I can’t buy this nonsense. It’s just partisan, inconsistent and hypocritical nonsense. [Post edited 12 Nov 2021 11:14]
|
It's more like you sticking up for Trump again. I thought I'd agreed with you that what Harris said was shameful and it encouraged violence.
If there was/is any intelligence and the records are published then we will know for sure.
If you are seriously claiming though, that the POTUS would not do anything about a possible attack on the United States Congress then you are barking. it s his job. If Trump knew and did nothing he is guilty as sin.
That begs the question again, why is Trump trying to stop these things coming out?
its not partisan, it's the USA and I have no dog in that fight and I've been critical of Biden too. How is it inconsistent? How is it hypocritical? | |
| |
| Trumpet trying to avoid the truth on 11:30 - Nov 12 with 792 views | Dr_Parnassus |
| Trumpet trying to avoid the truth on 11:21 - Nov 12 by Catullus |
It's more like you sticking up for Trump again. I thought I'd agreed with you that what Harris said was shameful and it encouraged violence.
If there was/is any intelligence and the records are published then we will know for sure.
If you are seriously claiming though, that the POTUS would not do anything about a possible attack on the United States Congress then you are barking. it s his job. If Trump knew and did nothing he is guilty as sin.
That begs the question again, why is Trump trying to stop these things coming out?
its not partisan, it's the USA and I have no dog in that fight and I've been critical of Biden too. How is it inconsistent? How is it hypocritical? |
I stick up for common sense.
The fact that the overwhelming majority of the nonsense on this forum either gets directed at Donald Trump or Steve Cooper means that I will be adding reality to their subjects more than any other.
At no point have you called Kamala Harris dangerous or called for her to be removed from power for inciting deadly riots, no. You didn’t at the time they were happening either, you only raised your head when the finger was being pointed at Trump funnily enough and then being backed into a corner to recognise it or be labelled a hypocrite.
I have already explained to you. The Capitol building is heavily guarded and heavily protected, there was armed officers inside and outside the compound. It was already fortified, hence why they were able to stop it.
It is absolutely partisan. If this was anyone other than Trump you wouldn’t be here writing about it, you even said:- “Still though, it would be funny to see Trump hung out to dry.”
If that is not a partisan comment then I don’t know what is.
Sorry mate, having none of it. [Post edited 12 Nov 2021 11:34]
| |
| |
| Trumpet trying to avoid the truth on 12:27 - Nov 12 with 765 views | majorraglan |
The key question is whether the attack on the Capitol building was a spontaneous act which couldn’t have been foreseen, was it suspected there’d be “minor”disorder but things “escalated” way beyond what was anticipated or was it “preplanned?”
There’s lots of questions in need of answering. When BLM demonstrated at the same location the National Guard were mobilised and significant numbers of additional resources were deployed, that didn’t happen for this demonstration, police resources were overwhelmed and the building subsequently overrun. If it was a completely spontaneous act it would explain the building being over run, but if the authorities suspected or knew about what was coming why wasn’t the NG mobilised? There’s either been a failure of intelligence gathering by the law enforcement agencies, or intelligence has been gathered and wrongly interpreted, intelligence has been gathered and ignored or intelligence has been gathered and deliberately ignored.
I know we’ve had riots in this country and things have got out of hand, but nobody’s got in to the HOC in this scale.
There’s some serious questions in need of answering. In my opinion Trump, by seeking to withhold the information is implying he has something to hide. That may not be the case, but it’s just my impression. [Post edited 12 Nov 2021 12:30]
| | | |
| Trumpet trying to avoid the truth on 12:35 - Nov 12 with 754 views | Dr_Parnassus |
| Trumpet trying to avoid the truth on 12:27 - Nov 12 by majorraglan |
The key question is whether the attack on the Capitol building was a spontaneous act which couldn’t have been foreseen, was it suspected there’d be “minor”disorder but things “escalated” way beyond what was anticipated or was it “preplanned?”
There’s lots of questions in need of answering. When BLM demonstrated at the same location the National Guard were mobilised and significant numbers of additional resources were deployed, that didn’t happen for this demonstration, police resources were overwhelmed and the building subsequently overrun. If it was a completely spontaneous act it would explain the building being over run, but if the authorities suspected or knew about what was coming why wasn’t the NG mobilised? There’s either been a failure of intelligence gathering by the law enforcement agencies, or intelligence has been gathered and wrongly interpreted, intelligence has been gathered and ignored or intelligence has been gathered and deliberately ignored.
I know we’ve had riots in this country and things have got out of hand, but nobody’s got in to the HOC in this scale.
There’s some serious questions in need of answering. In my opinion Trump, by seeking to withhold the information is implying he has something to hide. That may not be the case, but it’s just my impression. [Post edited 12 Nov 2021 12:30]
|
When BLM and Antifa took over a large part of Seattle, nothing was mobilised. Trump offered to move the national guard in yet the Governor withdrew the police, rejected the offer and called it “the summer of love”.
Two people were killed in that occupation, including a 16 year old.
These riots were out of hand all year, it’s amazing that people are only getting concerned about the one at the end of it all.
Previously to that we saw the same riots Kamala was encouraging, use quick drying cement on a police precincts exit while trying to burn the occupants alive inside. Horrific daily scenes that nobody seemed to care about.
It’s amazing how little was said by the same people condemning this one. Or maybe it isn’t… | |
| |
| Trumpet trying to avoid the truth on 13:05 - Nov 12 with 741 views | Lohengrin |
| Trumpet trying to avoid the truth on 11:14 - Nov 12 by Kilkennyjack |
Well Loh ….
With respect, I think the definition suggests it was ….
‘Insurrection also falls under the same suite of federal laws as sedition, and the two can be difficult to distinguish. ... It means, essentially, to incite, assist in or engage in a full-on rebellion against the government: a step beyond just conspiring against it, and requiring that significant violence be involved.’
5 people died that day. More injured.
Now it was badly organised, naive, and doomed to certain failure …. but it was Trumps attempt to stop Biden being declared President by any means necessary.
Jail time beckons. |
I think we both know what an actual insurrection looks like, Killy: Dublin, 1916; Moscow, 1917 and Madrid, 1936 to name a few.
The events in Washington were a comparative infant school squabble. | |
| An idea isn't responsible for those who believe in it. |
| |
| Trumpet trying to avoid the truth on 13:10 - Nov 12 with 733 views | Lohengrin |
| Trumpet trying to avoid the truth on 12:27 - Nov 12 by majorraglan |
The key question is whether the attack on the Capitol building was a spontaneous act which couldn’t have been foreseen, was it suspected there’d be “minor”disorder but things “escalated” way beyond what was anticipated or was it “preplanned?”
There’s lots of questions in need of answering. When BLM demonstrated at the same location the National Guard were mobilised and significant numbers of additional resources were deployed, that didn’t happen for this demonstration, police resources were overwhelmed and the building subsequently overrun. If it was a completely spontaneous act it would explain the building being over run, but if the authorities suspected or knew about what was coming why wasn’t the NG mobilised? There’s either been a failure of intelligence gathering by the law enforcement agencies, or intelligence has been gathered and wrongly interpreted, intelligence has been gathered and ignored or intelligence has been gathered and deliberately ignored.
I know we’ve had riots in this country and things have got out of hand, but nobody’s got in to the HOC in this scale.
There’s some serious questions in need of answering. In my opinion Trump, by seeking to withhold the information is implying he has something to hide. That may not be the case, but it’s just my impression. [Post edited 12 Nov 2021 12:30]
|
” I know we’ve had riots in this country and things have got out of hand, but nobody’s got in to the HOC in this scale.”
Not on that scale, nothing like it, but I was up in London on the Countryside Alliance protest twenty years back when things started to turn violent and about a dozen protestors managed to get into the chamber when The House was in session and disrupt it. I think Bryan Ferry’s son was one of them? | |
| An idea isn't responsible for those who believe in it. |
| |
| Trumpet trying to avoid the truth on 13:40 - Nov 12 with 719 views | A_Fans_Dad |
It is quite staggering how little the posters on here know about what has been happening in the regarding the so called insurrection on Jan 6th.
Which is undersatnable because it is not reported in mass media.
Are you aware for instance that the 100 odd people who were arrested have been in prison ever since, many of whom didn't actually go in the building?
No bail, no Trial and in most cases no actual charges.
Thay have been denied their constitutional rights to a speedy trial, kept in solitary, denied medicines, punished by having their water turned off for days at a time, beaten by guards, no visits allowed, intervention and inspection by congress members blocked until last week.
The information that has been coming out via FOIA requests for video eveidnce have shown many of the instigators of the attacks on the police and entry in to the building were by former FBI informants, who are not in prison.
The only people killed during the trouble were killed by the Police and not one single person killed by so called "insurrectionists".
Not one person has been put on trial for "insurrection".
While all you can do is crow about more investigations in to Trump, what a sad bunch you are.
Any of you aware of Ashley Biden's diary and the DOJ/FBI reaction to it? | | | |
| Trumpet trying to avoid the truth on 14:21 - Nov 12 with 703 views | Professor |
| Trumpet trying to avoid the truth on 13:40 - Nov 12 by A_Fans_Dad |
It is quite staggering how little the posters on here know about what has been happening in the regarding the so called insurrection on Jan 6th.
Which is undersatnable because it is not reported in mass media.
Are you aware for instance that the 100 odd people who were arrested have been in prison ever since, many of whom didn't actually go in the building?
No bail, no Trial and in most cases no actual charges.
Thay have been denied their constitutional rights to a speedy trial, kept in solitary, denied medicines, punished by having their water turned off for days at a time, beaten by guards, no visits allowed, intervention and inspection by congress members blocked until last week.
The information that has been coming out via FOIA requests for video eveidnce have shown many of the instigators of the attacks on the police and entry in to the building were by former FBI informants, who are not in prison.
The only people killed during the trouble were killed by the Police and not one single person killed by so called "insurrectionists".
Not one person has been put on trial for "insurrection".
While all you can do is crow about more investigations in to Trump, what a sad bunch you are.
Any of you aware of Ashley Biden's diary and the DOJ/FBI reaction to it? |
It is widely reported if you look at a range of media. Not videos on websites
691 people have been charged. Fewer than 200 have been held in custody prior to trial.
Trials have been ongoing since July. Over 100 people have pleaded guilty to largely minor misdemeanour offences. Most of those charged on more serious offences have not yet gone to trail and investigations are ongoing. The longest sentence thus far is 41 months.
The majority of your claims are complete conspiracy hogwash. | | | |
| Trumpet trying to avoid the truth on 16:14 - Nov 12 with 679 views | CountyJim |
When this happened on the news a reporter said if this was a black lives matter march there would be police all over it .
On this occasion police officers ( some anyway ) helped the wasp protesters
Strange one that 🤔 |  | | |
| Trumpet trying to avoid the truth on 16:16 - Nov 12 with 672 views | Professor |
| Trumpet trying to avoid the truth on 13:10 - Nov 12 by Lohengrin |
” I know we’ve had riots in this country and things have got out of hand, but nobody’s got in to the HOC in this scale.”
Not on that scale, nothing like it, but I was up in London on the Countryside Alliance protest twenty years back when things started to turn violent and about a dozen protestors managed to get into the chamber when The House was in session and disrupt it. I think Bryan Ferry’s son was one of them? |
He certainly was. | | | |
| Trumpet trying to avoid the truth on 16:40 - Nov 12 with 664 views | Catullus |
| Trumpet trying to avoid the truth on 11:30 - Nov 12 by Dr_Parnassus |
I stick up for common sense.
The fact that the overwhelming majority of the nonsense on this forum either gets directed at Donald Trump or Steve Cooper means that I will be adding reality to their subjects more than any other.
At no point have you called Kamala Harris dangerous or called for her to be removed from power for inciting deadly riots, no. You didn’t at the time they were happening either, you only raised your head when the finger was being pointed at Trump funnily enough and then being backed into a corner to recognise it or be labelled a hypocrite.
I have already explained to you. The Capitol building is heavily guarded and heavily protected, there was armed officers inside and outside the compound. It was already fortified, hence why they were able to stop it.
It is absolutely partisan. If this was anyone other than Trump you wouldn’t be here writing about it, you even said:- “Still though, it would be funny to see Trump hung out to dry.”
If that is not a partisan comment then I don’t know what is.
Sorry mate, having none of it. [Post edited 12 Nov 2021 11:34]
|
partisan
[ˈpÉ‘Ëtɪzan, ËŒpÉ‘Ëtɪˈzan]
NOUN
a strong supporter of a party, cause, or person.
"partisans of the exiled Stuarts"
synonyms:
supporter · follower · adherent · devotee · champion · backer · upholder · [More]
a member of an armed group formed to fight secretly against an occupying force, in particular one operating in German-occupied Yugoslavia, Italy, and parts of eastern Europe in the Second World War.
"the partisans opened fire from the woods" · [More]
synonyms:
guerrilla · freedom fighter · resistance fighter · member of the resistance · underground fighter · irregular soldier · irregular · terrorist
ADJECTIVE
prejudiced in favour of a particular cause.
"we will need people to put partisan politics aside and work with us for the good of the country" · [More]
synonyms:
biased · prejudiced · one-sided · coloured · discriminatory · preferential · [More]
Come on then, show me where I have ever strong supporter of Biden and Harris. Show me where I have been a strong Democrat supporter.
I wasn't backed into a corner about anything either. I agreed that Harris was wrong and that those riots were wrong.
The Capitol building is heavily guarded yet so many people managed to get inside, they didn't manage to stop it did they? They got into many parts of the building including Nancy Pelosi's office before order was restored.
So, not partisan, not hypocritical and not inconsistent. You must try harder. | |
| |
| Trumpet trying to avoid the truth on 16:54 - Nov 12 with 660 views | Flynnidine_Zidownes |
| Trumpet trying to avoid the truth on 13:05 - Nov 12 by Lohengrin |
I think we both know what an actual insurrection looks like, Killy: Dublin, 1916; Moscow, 1917 and Madrid, 1936 to name a few.
The events in Washington were a comparative infant school squabble. |
Yeah from what I saw of the Washington incident they were more like excited tourists who could scarcely believe they had got in, kicking back in Nancy pelosi’s office drinking her ice cold beer. Most of the people being charged are on a minor misdemeanour charge. Obviously there were people hurt and the perpetrators of that should be brought to justice but it was mainly all a bit of handbags at dawn compared to what we see around the world on almost a daily basis. | | | |
| |
By continuing to use the site, you agree to our use of cookies and to abide by our Terms and Conditions.
