| AI interviews 19:53 - Oct 1 with 1264 views | Catullus |
I applied for a job yesterday and i had to go online to do an interview. I was expecting a zoom face to face but instead a link was sent to me for an artifical intelligence site where I was asked questions and my answers generated a profile which was sent to the Company involved. It was new one on me, I've done a profiling interbiew before but the answers were assessed by humans.. Anyone else done one of these? Is this going to be the common thing from now on?
Anyway, these are my results,
Insight 1
You take a pragmatic approach to your work and prefer to take the ‘road well-travelled’ over new or different approaches. Living by a routine is your preferred approach over new ways of doing things.
Insight 2
You are usually goal orientated and enjoy organising and planning your approach to achieve them. You work consistently and mostly methodically, considering your choices and decisions carefully. People would describe you as dependable.
Insight 3
You trust your counsel and are not someone who makes rash decisions. You consider options carefully. Your quieter disposition may be seen as lack of enthusiasm, but this isn’t necessarily the case. You just show your excitement differently and don’t like to be the centre of attention.
Insight 4
You can hold your own with most people in most situations. You are less inclined to trust the opinions of others preferring to rely on your information gathering and critical thinking.
Insight 5
It makes you feel good to be sought out for your counsel or a sympathetic ear. You are tuned-in to how others feel, and you also value being able to share your problems with others.
Insight 6
You are trusted by those who know you to always do the right thing and put the needs of others before your own. You are modest about your achievements and feel that rewards come to those who earn them rather than based on any entitlement.
Those results apparently generated by AI. Does anybody find that worrying? We are being judged by computers, our future employment in the hands of a computer but the program, originally written by a human is a learning program, how can we trust it? What if the original program was flawed? |  |
| |  |
| AI interviews on 19:56 - Oct 1 with 1247 views | onehunglow |
Glad I no longer have to worry about that stuff.
Mind blowing
My lad was interviewing for managers last week and what he told me as regards the content blew me away-or I lost interest. Or both,I forget now. [Post edited 1 Oct 2021 19:57]
| |
| |
| AI interviews on 20:05 - Oct 1 with 1226 views | WalterBoyd |
I have done a number of these over the years.
If you get the job they are great.
If you dont get the job a load of nonsense. 😀
If the job is looking for a certain personality trait and you think it has assessed you correctly, could rightly save you landing a job you would not have been suited to or matching you with a perfect job.
If a job has too many applicants it can be effective to reduce the number of applications, but would like to think the last / best 8 or so candidates have an interview with a human being, ideally face to face in person, but so many jobs now filled through zoom interviews.
Good luck anyway. | | | |
| AI interviews on 20:08 - Oct 1 with 1224 views | KeithHaynes |
| AI interviews on 19:56 - Oct 1 by onehunglow |
Glad I no longer have to worry about that stuff.
Mind blowing
My lad was interviewing for managers last week and what he told me as regards the content blew me away-or I lost interest. Or both,I forget now. [Post edited 1 Oct 2021 19:57]
|
Matrix scoring, it’s a one day course to at least understand it. |  |
| |
| AI interviews on 20:10 - Oct 1 with 1223 views | Catullus |
| AI interviews on 19:56 - Oct 1 by onehunglow |
Glad I no longer have to worry about that stuff.
Mind blowing
My lad was interviewing for managers last week and what he told me as regards the content blew me away-or I lost interest. Or both,I forget now. [Post edited 1 Oct 2021 19:57]
|
On the page before I clicked the link to start it said the point of the AI was to judge everyone equally from the beginning. It doesn't ask if you are man , woman or any other gender. It doesn't ask about colour, nationality or religious beliefs. However, surely it only works if you answers are absolutely honest. It cannot judge your character and with the right schooling surely you can say what you need to so you get a favourable outcome?
If my application goes further I still expect a face to face interview but will this AI thing take over one day? | |
| |
| AI interviews on 20:15 - Oct 1 with 1213 views | onehunglow |
| AI interviews on 20:10 - Oct 1 by Catullus |
On the page before I clicked the link to start it said the point of the AI was to judge everyone equally from the beginning. It doesn't ask if you are man , woman or any other gender. It doesn't ask about colour, nationality or religious beliefs. However, surely it only works if you answers are absolutely honest. It cannot judge your character and with the right schooling surely you can say what you need to so you get a favourable outcome?
If my application goes further I still expect a face to face interview but will this AI thing take over one day? |
Honesty is something that only the individual knows. | |
| |
| AI interviews on 20:26 - Oct 1 with 1211 views | Catullus |
| AI interviews on 20:15 - Oct 1 by onehunglow |
Honesty is something that only the individual knows. |
I was honest and to be fair the 'insights' are pretty damn close but I'm still not sure about being judged by AI! | |
| |
| AI interviews on 20:26 - Oct 1 with 1209 views | trampie |
It's definitely concerning way of interviewing if the final selection is based on the computer. |  |
| |
| AI interviews on 20:30 - Oct 1 with 1207 views | KeithHaynes |
| AI interviews on 20:26 - Oct 1 by trampie |
It's definitely concerning way of interviewing if the final selection is based on the computer. |
It’s based on the score for each answer, decided by three interviewers In mist situations.
Eachcandidate is asked the same question, the ability of the candidate to introduce their own agenda in to their answer is the key. | |
| |
Login to get fewer ads
| AI interviews on 20:54 - Oct 1 with 1176 views | trampie |
| AI interviews on 20:30 - Oct 1 by KeithHaynes |
It’s based on the score for each answer, decided by three interviewers In mist situations.
Eachcandidate is asked the same question, the ability of the candidate to introduce their own agenda in to their answer is the key. |
The computer can be swizzed. | |
| |
| AI interviews on 21:32 - Oct 1 with 1158 views | max936 |
My lad came home from his flat on Tuesday and said a job he applied for and had an online interview for, has come up trumps, one job vacancy and he beat off a load of other applicants to get the position, so he's coming back home to live, gonna miss our trips up to Sussex to see him though, lovely part of the World, expensive, but lovely. |  |
| |
| AI interviews on 22:51 - Oct 1 with 1120 views | Treforys_Jack |
| AI interviews on 20:54 - Oct 1 by trampie |
The computer can be swizzed. |
"swizzed" love it lol, |  | | |
| AI interviews on 00:43 - Oct 2 with 1082 views | majorraglan |
Not quite AI interviews, but there’s a nice article in today’s Guardian about a Welsh scientist Andrew Hopkins from Neath who’s AI biotech company has just floated in New York for $2.9bn, his share is now worth a cool $539m. First in his family to go to Uni and now worth half a billion. Hs companies work is speeding up the development of new drugs to targets cancers etc, Good on him.
A great story during these difficult times.
https://www.theguardian.com/bu | | | |
| AI interviews on 04:16 - Oct 2 with 1036 views | Treforys_Jack |
| AI interviews on 00:43 - Oct 2 by majorraglan |
Not quite AI interviews, but there’s a nice article in today’s Guardian about a Welsh scientist Andrew Hopkins from Neath who’s AI biotech company has just floated in New York for $2.9bn, his share is now worth a cool $539m. First in his family to go to Uni and now worth half a billion. Hs companies work is speeding up the development of new drugs to targets cancers etc, Good on him.
A great story during these difficult times.
https://www.theguardian.com/bu |
Wonder if he likes football, hmmmm | | | |
| AI interviews on 08:12 - Oct 2 with 989 views | monmouth |
If people arent scared yet about robotics and AI, then they are in for a rude awakening. Covid has made that awakening likely sooner. I just wish the robots could already drive lorries. |  |
| |
| AI interviews on 09:49 - Oct 2 with 958 views | Kilkennyjack |
| AI interviews on 00:43 - Oct 2 by majorraglan |
Not quite AI interviews, but there’s a nice article in today’s Guardian about a Welsh scientist Andrew Hopkins from Neath who’s AI biotech company has just floated in New York for $2.9bn, his share is now worth a cool $539m. First in his family to go to Uni and now worth half a billion. Hs companies work is speeding up the development of new drugs to targets cancers etc, Good on him.
A great story during these difficult times.
https://www.theguardian.com/bu |
Andrew Hopkins is a Jack, is a Jack, is a Jack … 🦢💰 |  |
| Beware of the Risen People
|
| |
| AI interviews on 08:06 - Oct 3 with 881 views | controversial_jack |
| AI interviews on 20:26 - Oct 1 by trampie |
It's definitely concerning way of interviewing if the final selection is based on the computer. |
It will reduce nepotism and favouritism and having to dress up smartly for first impressions and all that superficial nonsense | | | |
| AI interviews on 08:34 - Oct 3 with 867 views | trampie |
| AI interviews on 08:06 - Oct 3 by controversial_jack |
It will reduce nepotism and favouritism and having to dress up smartly for first impressions and all that superficial nonsense |
That is the upside but the downside is the candidate is unable to make their case in the traditional manner, what if they are the best candidate but due to an unfortunate childhood their schooling was wrecked, the computer might just look at the numbers and the company would miss out on the best person for the job. | |
| |
| AI interviews on 09:04 - Oct 3 with 849 views | controversial_jack |
| AI interviews on 08:34 - Oct 3 by trampie |
That is the upside but the downside is the candidate is unable to make their case in the traditional manner, what if they are the best candidate but due to an unfortunate childhood their schooling was wrecked, the computer might just look at the numbers and the company would miss out on the best person for the job. |
Recruitment is at best a guess. The best method would be , to get the names of the candidates on a piece of paper, qualifications and experience being similar, close your eyes and stick a pin in the names | | | |
| AI interviews on 09:13 - Oct 3 with 829 views | trampie |
| AI interviews on 09:04 - Oct 3 by controversial_jack |
Recruitment is at best a guess. The best method would be , to get the names of the candidates on a piece of paper, qualifications and experience being similar, close your eyes and stick a pin in the names |
Very little weight should be given to qualifications. | |
| |
| AI interviews on 16:23 - Oct 3 with 755 views | felixstowe_jack |
| AI interviews on 09:13 - Oct 3 by trampie |
Very little weight should be given to qualifications. |
I think I would prefer a qualified surgeon for a medical procedure and a qualified plumber for a water leak. | |
| |
| AI interviews on 16:33 - Oct 3 with 749 views | trampie |
| AI interviews on 16:23 - Oct 3 by felixstowe_jack |
I think I would prefer a qualified surgeon for a medical procedure and a qualified plumber for a water leak. |
Qualifications and qualified are two different things. | |
| |
| |
By continuing to use the site, you agree to our use of cookies and to abide by our Terms and Conditions.
