| FAO Some Trust Person 14:12 - Nov 26 with 26363 views | Darran |
How many co-oppers have applied for co-option and when will we find out who’s been co-opted? |  |
| |  |
| FAO Some Trust Person on 20:30 - Nov 26 with 1916 views | Uxbridge |
| FAO Some Trust Person on 20:26 - Nov 26 by exiledclaseboy |
According to Ux it’s a fact. And I’ve no reason to doubt him, he’s pretty straight even if he is being unusually evasive on this thread.  |
Am I? Possibly, I dunno. About what in particular? I'm probably not quite as dogmatic about certain things, but there are probably many reasons for that. I wouldn't last a day in the DVLA would I! |  |
| |
| FAO Some Trust Person on 20:30 - Nov 26 with 1913 views | 3swan |
| FAO Some Trust Person on 20:26 - Nov 26 by Uxbridge |
Assuming the rules are applied without amendment, yes. If not, no. I'd argue for an amendment, although I'm not yet convinced on the merits of making it retrospective. |
OK clear now.
I took the statement to read the board had already discussed and the decision was to implement the new rules at the AGM |  | | |
| FAO Some Trust Person on 20:32 - Nov 26 with 1903 views | Uxbridge |
| FAO Some Trust Person on 20:27 - Nov 26 by 3swan |
Maybe I'm not making myself clear.
The answers should be there if they have sight of the new rules. |
Everyone does.. https://supporters-direct.org/rules-and-policies-1
But like I say, they can be varied as required. | |
| |
| FAO Some Trust Person on 20:32 - Nov 26 with 1897 views | exiledclaseboy |
| FAO Some Trust Person on 20:30 - Nov 26 by 3swan |
OK clear now.
I took the statement to read the board had already discussed and the decision was to implement the new rules at the AGM |
That’s a decision for members, not the board. |  |
| |
| FAO Some Trust Person on 20:34 - Nov 26 with 1893 views | Uxbridge |
| FAO Some Trust Person on 20:30 - Nov 26 by 3swan |
OK clear now.
I took the statement to read the board had already discussed and the decision was to implement the new rules at the AGM |
Either way it's the plan, but it's all irrelevant as it's up to the members to agree or not. If not, then 2001 applies and I'm not entirely sure what happens then. | |
| |
| FAO Some Trust Person on 20:35 - Nov 26 with 1884 views | Uxbridge |
| FAO Some Trust Person on 20:32 - Nov 26 by exiledclaseboy |
That’s a decision for members, not the board. |
See, we agree. I knew we'd get there  | |
| |
| FAO Some Trust Person on 20:36 - Nov 26 with 1879 views | exiledclaseboy |
| FAO Some Trust Person on 20:34 - Nov 26 by Uxbridge |
Either way it's the plan, but it's all irrelevant as it's up to the members to agree or not. If not, then 2001 applies and I'm not entirely sure what happens then. |
And of course there’s the intervening period during which the current rules still apply. | |
| |
| FAO Some Trust Person on 20:36 - Nov 26 with 1874 views | 3swan |
Everything is now clear.
When new SD new rules were quoted I thought there was a further update coming than the ones in July 2012 | | | |
Login to get fewer ads
| FAO Some Trust Person on 20:36 - Nov 26 with 1876 views | Uxbridge |
| FAO Some Trust Person on 20:36 - Nov 26 by exiledclaseboy |
And of course there’s the intervening period during which the current rules still apply. |
Indeed. Which is why the Trust consulted SD for the appropriate interim process. | |
| |
| FAO Some Trust Person on 20:38 - Nov 26 with 1862 views | exiledclaseboy |
| FAO Some Trust Person on 20:36 - Nov 26 by Uxbridge |
Indeed. Which is why the Trust consulted SD for the appropriate interim process. |
I’m genuinely surprised that the advice from SD was to ignore the rules that currently govern the Trust. | |
| |
| FAO Some Trust Person on 20:39 - Nov 26 with 1858 views | 3swan |
| FAO Some Trust Person on 20:35 - Nov 26 by Uxbridge |
See, we agree. I knew we'd get there |
I shouldn't I know.
But
Will it be a strong recommendation to go with the 2012 rules before a vote
| | | |
| FAO Some Trust Person on 20:44 - Nov 26 with 1840 views | Garyjack |
Surely, if the reason the trust wanted to adopt the new model rules was because there was a lack of new applications, the fact that 14 people have now applied for 4 positions means that any board member who has served 12 years should now gracefully stand aside? |  | | |
| FAO Some Trust Person on 20:47 - Nov 26 with 1822 views | Vetchfielder |
These are the 2012 rules but you've referred previously to the 2016 rules - so are you able to provide a link to those please, the ones you propose to adopt ?
Also, what will be the process for proposing amendment to those rules ? |  |
| Proud to have been one of the 231 |
| |
| FAO Some Trust Person on 20:48 - Nov 26 with 1816 views | 3swan |
| FAO Some Trust Person on 20:44 - Nov 26 by Garyjack |
Surely, if the reason the trust wanted to adopt the new model rules was because there was a lack of new applications, the fact that 14 people have now applied for 4 positions means that any board member who has served 12 years should now gracefully stand aside? |
At least put themselves up for re-election.
As in most things in life I want the best balance on the board that reflects not only the need of the board but a true reflection of the fanbase | | | |
| FAO Some Trust Person on 21:00 - Nov 26 with 1785 views | Garyjack |
| FAO Some Trust Person on 20:44 - Nov 26 by Garyjack |
Surely, if the reason the trust wanted to adopt the new model rules was because there was a lack of new applications, the fact that 14 people have now applied for 4 positions means that any board member who has served 12 years should now gracefully stand aside? |
Ux? | | | |
| FAO Some Trust Person on 21:04 - Nov 26 with 1770 views | Uxbridge |
| FAO Some Trust Person on 21:00 - Nov 26 by Garyjack |
Ux? |
16 mins. Just saying, like.
I don't see why the two are related personally. | |
| |
| FAO Some Trust Person on 21:06 - Nov 26 with 1755 views | Flashberryjack |
| FAO Some Trust Person on 15:58 - Nov 26 by Jackfath |
Mine too. |
Mine as well |  |
| |
| FAO Some Trust Person on 21:07 - Nov 26 with 1750 views | Uxbridge |
| FAO Some Trust Person on 20:47 - Nov 26 by Vetchfielder |
These are the 2012 rules but you've referred previously to the 2016 rules - so are you able to provide a link to those please, the ones you propose to adopt ?
Also, what will be the process for proposing amendment to those rules ? |
Are they? Are you sure? That's SDs website.
It'd be a good idea to publish the proposed rules beforehand. I'll suggest it. | |
| |
| FAO Some Trust Person on 21:11 - Nov 26 with 1740 views | Garyjack |
| FAO Some Trust Person on 21:04 - Nov 26 by Uxbridge |
16 mins. Just saying, like.
I don't see why the two are related personally. |
WHAT! You don't see the that the trust are adopting the new rules because of a lack of new applicants, and the fact that there are now 14 new applicants for 4 positions is not related! Jesus Christ!  | | | |
| FAO Some Trust Person on 21:14 - Nov 26 with 1722 views | Uxbridge |
| FAO Some Trust Person on 21:11 - Nov 26 by Garyjack |
WHAT! You don't see the that the trust are adopting the new rules because of a lack of new applicants, and the fact that there are now 14 new applicants for 4 positions is not related! Jesus Christ! |
Who said that was the reason for adopting the new model rules? | |
| |
| FAO Some Trust Person on 21:16 - Nov 26 with 1713 views | londonlisa2001 |
And mine. | | | |
| FAO Some Trust Person on 21:18 - Nov 26 with 1695 views | exiledclaseboy |
Seeing as we’re all confessing, mine too. | |
| |
| FAO Some Trust Person on 21:18 - Nov 26 with 1695 views | Garyjack |
| FAO Some Trust Person on 21:14 - Nov 26 by Uxbridge |
Who said that was the reason for adopting the new model rules? |
Actually i think it was you. I'll check your posts. | | | |
| FAO Some Trust Person on 21:20 - Nov 26 with 1682 views | Uxbridge |
| FAO Some Trust Person on 21:18 - Nov 26 by Garyjack |
Actually i think it was you. I'll check your posts. |
Nah. The old ones are majorly outdated, and it's not the first time the Trust have planned to update model rules as per Supporters Direct updates. | |
| |
| |
By continuing to use the site, you agree to our use of cookies and to abide by our Terms and Conditions.
