Please log in or register. Registered visitors get fewer ads.
Forum index | Previous Thread | Next thread
Hazza and Meghan step back 18:56 - Jan 8 with 3507 viewsMrSwerve

https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-51040751

Poll: Decision day - who wins the PL title?

0
Hazza and Meghan step back on 13:18 - Jan 9 with 792 viewsAlfieMooresSon

Hazza and Meghan step back on 19:02 - Jan 8 by Swanjaxs

They said they intend to "work to become financially independent".


Load of bollòxs


Cut them off, no changing your minds, no more cash, feck off to Canada then
2

Hazza and Meghan step back on 13:30 - Jan 9 with 778 viewsNotLoyal

The pair of them wouldn't know, a days work if it inserted itself in both their arses.

No I didn't invent the tit wÁnk you stupid fcking twát Oh ... Shhhhh, yes it's me, I think I really p1ssed that bloke from Aberdare off. Don't tell him.
Poll: It's European election day, whose ya voting for ?

0
Hazza and Meghan step back on 14:03 - Jan 9 with 751 viewsHighjack

Hazza and Meghan step back on 12:59 - Jan 9 by londonlisa2001

She’s undoubtedly been treated badly by the media. They criticised her constantly while she was pregnant in particular.

Harry hasn’t helped though, as he doesn’t want to earn his crust unless it involves doing stuff he likes doing.


Criticism is part of the job though surely as a member of the royal family? Has there ever been a member of the royals who hasn’t been criticised by the press at some point?

The creatures outside looked from pig to man, and from man to pig, and from pig to man again; but already it was impossible to say which was which.
Poll: The official planetswans European election poll. Your vote goes to?

1
Hazza and Meghan step back on 14:04 - Jan 9 with 748 viewsVincent_Vega

Hazza and Meghan step back on 14:03 - Jan 9 by Highjack

Criticism is part of the job though surely as a member of the royal family? Has there ever been a member of the royals who hasn’t been criticised by the press at some point?


Yeah but Meggzie is black you know.

Boycott Shampoo......Demand Real Poo!!!

0
Hazza and Meghan step back on 14:26 - Jan 9 with 727 viewsHighjack

Hazza and Meghan step back on 14:04 - Jan 9 by Vincent_Vega

Yeah but Meggzie is black you know.


She’s mixed race, but a lot of the time you see her she looks whiter than Harry and he’s a ginger.

I quite like the both of them, I think they want to do good, but they keep doing stupid stuff that deserves criticism such as taking four private jets in eleven days whilst simultaneously moaning about people not doing things in their own lives to mitigate their footprint.

The creatures outside looked from pig to man, and from man to pig, and from pig to man again; but already it was impossible to say which was which.
Poll: The official planetswans European election poll. Your vote goes to?

3
Hazza and Meghan step back on 15:00 - Jan 9 with 699 viewsVincent_Vega

Hazza and Meghan step back on 14:26 - Jan 9 by Highjack

She’s mixed race, but a lot of the time you see her she looks whiter than Harry and he’s a ginger.

I quite like the both of them, I think they want to do good, but they keep doing stupid stuff that deserves criticism such as taking four private jets in eleven days whilst simultaneously moaning about people not doing things in their own lives to mitigate their footprint.


I'm with you put it this way, when all that palaver came out about Prince Andrew no one thought people are being too harsh on him and the worlds press slammed him, comedians mocked him (rightly so) and everyone had their 2p worth out of him.

Now I know it's different issue but you can't seem to criticize Meghan in any way due to her heritage. It's wrong.

Oh and yes they're a tad hypocritical going around saying 'cut you're carbon footprint' while taking private jets to god knows where.

Boycott Shampoo......Demand Real Poo!!!

1
Hazza and Meghan step back on 16:00 - Jan 9 with 660 viewsHighjack

Hazza and Meghan step back on 15:00 - Jan 9 by Vincent_Vega

I'm with you put it this way, when all that palaver came out about Prince Andrew no one thought people are being too harsh on him and the worlds press slammed him, comedians mocked him (rightly so) and everyone had their 2p worth out of him.

Now I know it's different issue but you can't seem to criticize Meghan in any way due to her heritage. It's wrong.

Oh and yes they're a tad hypocritical going around saying 'cut you're carbon footprint' while taking private jets to god knows where.


The only thing I think is wrong is when the media criticise them for the way they look or their choice of dress or some other superficial factor. Her and Kate always look bloody amazing. They’re the first attractive princesses since Ariel in the little mermaid, but they photograph them in a raincoat at seven in the morning in the blustery wind and rain with their hair all over the place and it’s “Kate looked tired and frumpy as she emerged from the palace.”

When they say or do something stupid it’s fair game.

The creatures outside looked from pig to man, and from man to pig, and from pig to man again; but already it was impossible to say which was which.
Poll: The official planetswans European election poll. Your vote goes to?

0
Hazza and Meghan step back on 16:01 - Jan 9 with 656 viewsOldjack

Hazza and Meghan step back on 13:30 - Jan 9 by NotLoyal

The pair of them wouldn't know, a days work if it inserted itself in both their arses.


Oi oi breaking news ………… The Duchess of Sussex, Meghan Markle, is to start a new job in Greggs.
She starts training for her sales assistant role on Monday and her new career is a drive to becoming more financially independent.
A spokeswoman for the palace told WalesOnCraic:
“As announced yesterday, both Harry and Meghan have declared that they wish to step aside from becoming ‘senior royals’, and wish to explore new avenues of financial independence. We can now reveal that Meghan attended an interview at a local Greggs last week and was offered a sales assistant role (or should that be roll? Haw haw) a few days later. Harry is holding out for a position at a local KFC which means that they’ll have to drop Archie off Buckingham Palace every morning so that he’s looked after. Meghan’s first day’s training will be learning how to correctly identify steak bakes from their vegan counterparts, and similarly with the sausage rolls. That’s fairly easy with the sausage rolls because the vegan ones look a bit anaemic to me. But what do I know eh?”
Meghan is hoping to complete her training and collect her congratulatory hair-bun at the end of next week.

Prosser the Tosser dwells on Phil's bum hole like a rusty old hemorrhoid ,fact You Greedy Bastards Get Out Of OUR Club!

0
Login to get fewer ads

Hazza and Meghan step back on 16:06 - Jan 9 with 651 viewsVincent_Vega

Hazza and Meghan step back on 16:00 - Jan 9 by Highjack

The only thing I think is wrong is when the media criticise them for the way they look or their choice of dress or some other superficial factor. Her and Kate always look bloody amazing. They’re the first attractive princesses since Ariel in the little mermaid, but they photograph them in a raincoat at seven in the morning in the blustery wind and rain with their hair all over the place and it’s “Kate looked tired and frumpy as she emerged from the palace.”

When they say or do something stupid it’s fair game.


Oh yes the media in this country is mad!

Didn't the sun do a clickbait article saying the woman who does the voice for Peppa Pig was 'unrecognisable' on a night out on the lash for her 18th? WHO knows or cares who Peppa pigs voiceover looks like?!

Boycott Shampoo......Demand Real Poo!!!

0
Hazza and Meghan step back on 17:11 - Jan 9 with 611 viewslondonlisa2001

Hazza and Meghan step back on 14:03 - Jan 9 by Highjack

Criticism is part of the job though surely as a member of the royal family? Has there ever been a member of the royals who hasn’t been criticised by the press at some point?


Criticism for behaving like idiots, yes. Criticism over her ‘cradling her bump’ and other such spurious nonsense, no.
0
Hazza and Meghan step back on 17:13 - Jan 9 with 607 viewslondonlisa2001

Hazza and Meghan step back on 15:00 - Jan 9 by Vincent_Vega

I'm with you put it this way, when all that palaver came out about Prince Andrew no one thought people are being too harsh on him and the worlds press slammed him, comedians mocked him (rightly so) and everyone had their 2p worth out of him.

Now I know it's different issue but you can't seem to criticize Meghan in any way due to her heritage. It's wrong.

Oh and yes they're a tad hypocritical going around saying 'cut you're carbon footprint' while taking private jets to god knows where.


You can criticise Andrew because he’s, at best, good friends with a paedophile (at very best) and continued a very public association after the accusations had been proved, not because he’s white.
0

Hazza and Meghan step back on 18:37 - Jan 9 with 540 viewssainthelens

He's opening a fancy dress shop in Canada, specialising in nazi uniforms.
0

Hazza and Meghan step back on 18:50 - Jan 9 with 518 viewsmajorraglan

Compared to the other royal princess, I think Megan’s had a bit of a hard time, but to be honest I am not really bothered by it all and if they want to go off and do their own thing then crack on.
0
Hazza and Meghan step back on 19:33 - Jan 9 with 491 viewsGowerjack

Hazza and Meghan step back on 12:38 - Jan 9 by Tom1912

Good luck to them, the way Meghan has been treated by the media in this country is an absolute disgrace.


Yep

It's seems to me that the Great British public will tolerate having a nonce for a Prince but not a Duke marrying a person of colour..

Plastic since 1974
Poll: Is ECB for tyranny?

0
Hazza and Meghan step back on 19:36 - Jan 9 with 487 viewssainthelens

Hazza and Meghan step back on 19:33 - Jan 9 by Gowerjack

Yep

It's seems to me that the Great British public will tolerate having a nonce for a Prince but not a Duke marrying a person of colour..


That is a brilliant post.
0
Hazza and Meghan step back on 19:52 - Jan 9 with 466 viewslondonlisa2001

Hazza and Meghan step back on 19:33 - Jan 9 by Gowerjack

Yep

It's seems to me that the Great British public will tolerate having a nonce for a Prince but not a Duke marrying a person of colour..


I don’t think anyone is tolerating Andrew, but what option is there?

Agree that some of the issues with Meghan have been race related, although I also think her not being British has been as much of an issue as her mixed heritage. Plus she’s bright. It’s a role that seems to suit those that are really not very sparky.

I hope they just get on with it. The only issue is that at present they seem to want the best of both worlds by keeping the Duchy income, security, housing and titles. That’s not really going it alone, it’s just giving up the work bit.
3
Hazza and Meghan step back on 19:59 - Jan 9 with 450 viewsHighjack

Hazza and Meghan step back on 19:33 - Jan 9 by Gowerjack

Yep

It's seems to me that the Great British public will tolerate having a nonce for a Prince but not a Duke marrying a person of colour..


Who the hell is tolerating Prince Andrew?

The creatures outside looked from pig to man, and from man to pig, and from pig to man again; but already it was impossible to say which was which.
Poll: The official planetswans European election poll. Your vote goes to?

0
Hazza and Meghan step back on 20:02 - Jan 9 with 445 viewssainthelens

Hazza and Meghan step back on 19:59 - Jan 9 by Highjack

Who the hell is tolerating Prince Andrew?


Not many, but protecting...definitely.
0
Hazza and Meghan step back on 20:04 - Jan 9 with 441 viewslondonlisa2001

Hazza and Meghan step back on 20:02 - Jan 9 by sainthelens

Not many, but protecting...definitely.


The Great British public aren’t protecting him though. The family and the establishment is protecting him.

Most people I know want him questioned under oath and extradited if necessary.

Swap him for that woman who drove in to that young man and killed him and fled the country.
1
Hazza and Meghan step back on 20:36 - Jan 9 with 405 viewsHighjack

Hazza and Meghan step back on 19:36 - Jan 9 by sainthelens

That is a brilliant post.


It is brilliant apart from all of it which is demonstrably incorrect. The general public has not tolerated Prince Andrew in any way, shape or form and the general public is generally quite supportive of Megan in general, generally.

The creatures outside looked from pig to man, and from man to pig, and from pig to man again; but already it was impossible to say which was which.
Poll: The official planetswans European election poll. Your vote goes to?

0
Hazza and Meghan step back on 21:09 - Jan 9 with 380 viewsCatullus

Hazza and Meghan step back on 20:36 - Jan 9 by Highjack

It is brilliant apart from all of it which is demonstrably incorrect. The general public has not tolerated Prince Andrew in any way, shape or form and the general public is generally quite supportive of Megan in general, generally.


I entirely support Harry and Meghans decision, as long as they accept that walking away from the responsibility should mean giving up all the priviliges too.

The one goes with the other. If they want to move the states/Canada and cash in on the family name why should UK tax payers foot any of the bill?

Just my opinion, but WTF do I know anyway?
Blog: In, Out, in, out........

2

Hazza and Meghan step back on 21:18 - Jan 9 with 375 viewsexiledclaseboy

I’d imagine the Sussexes will be staying away from Parisian tunnels for some time.

Poll: Tory leader

0

Hazza and Meghan step back on 21:21 - Jan 9 with 361 viewssainthelens

Who's to say Harry's not pssd off at the way the establishment are protecting Andrew while he feels his Mrs is hung out to dry.
Not my opinion btw , just putting it out there.
1
Hazza and Meghan step back on 21:23 - Jan 9 with 352 viewslondonlisa2001

Hazza and Meghan step back on 21:09 - Jan 9 by Catullus

I entirely support Harry and Meghans decision, as long as they accept that walking away from the responsibility should mean giving up all the priviliges too.

The one goes with the other. If they want to move the states/Canada and cash in on the family name why should UK tax payers foot any of the bill?


They shouldn’t.

But realistically, much of this won’t happen will it.

You can’t have a situation where in 10 years time, William is the King and his brother and sister-in-law are flogging crap on the TV, or selling perceived access for millions of pounds.

I’m sure she’ll be offered a fortune for saying ‘she’s worth it’ but they simply can’t allow it to happen. If they keep their titles, any commercial activity is going to be seen as having the royal stamp of approval. They will have to abdicate completely (given up rights of succession etc) before they can do what they propose.

Hopefully it’ll all be a non issue as we won’t have a Royal Family by then anyway. It’s a contradiction in terms to have a hereditary monarch as head of state of a democracy, however unpalatable the list of doubtless shockingly dreadful presidential candidates we’d get.

The cost of them is hugely understated (their website says £1 per person of taxpayer money per annum - that’s utter nonsense as just the sovereign grant is multiples of that, without income from the Duchies of Lancaster and Cornwall taken into consideration, security costs, upkeep of royal residences etc etc).
0
Hazza and Meghan step back on 21:23 - Jan 9 with 352 viewsFlashberryjack

Hazza and Meghan step back on 21:21 - Jan 9 by sainthelens

Who's to say Harry's not pssd off at the way the establishment are protecting Andrew while he feels his Mrs is hung out to dry.
Not my opinion btw , just putting it out there.


Has Megan been hung out to dry ?
0
About Us Contact Us Terms & Conditions Privacy Cookies Advertising
© FansNetwork 2020