| US election observations 00:34 - Nov 7 with 7037 views | CountyJim | Why do they pick old men Why do these old men need to have a little jog before they go on stage Why do these old men as soon as they go on stage need to point at people in the audience Why does it take so long to count old mens votes |  | | |  |
| US election observations on 20:33 - Nov 9 with 982 views | FieryJack |
| US election observations on 20:14 - Nov 9 by A_Fans_Dad | Personally I would prefer to explore russia, russia, russia and that nice Mr Mueller's illegal enquiry. Then the illegal impeachment process. |
Point of order: when you start a new paragraph, please leave a line break. And it's Russia, not russia. It's little things like this that prevent you from being taken seriously (by me, anyway). |  | |  |
| US election observations on 21:53 - Nov 9 with 948 views | DJack |
| US election observations on 22:21 - Nov 8 by Dr_Parnassus | So, official drop off boxes are to be determined by the state. These aren't official drop off boxes, they are harvesting boxes. Hence why the word official was the issue, and was removed. Its easy. |
Firstly they pretended they were. Secondly in California the statute that allows third parties to collect ballots requires voters to formally “designate” the “person” who will return their ballot to election officials. This person must sign the ballot envelope and provide both their name and relationship to the voter. Votes left in a harvesting box do not meet this criteria and fail to meet the custody chain requirements for voting. Keep claiming what you want, you are still wrong. |  |
| It is far better to grasp the universe as it really is than to persist in delusion, however satisfying and reassuring. - Carl Sagan |
|  |
| US election observations on 22:04 - Nov 9 with 935 views | Dr_Parnassus |
| US election observations on 21:53 - Nov 9 by DJack | Firstly they pretended they were. Secondly in California the statute that allows third parties to collect ballots requires voters to formally “designate” the “person” who will return their ballot to election officials. This person must sign the ballot envelope and provide both their name and relationship to the voter. Votes left in a harvesting box do not meet this criteria and fail to meet the custody chain requirements for voting. Keep claiming what you want, you are still wrong. |
I am not claiming anything, I am telling you the exact situation. I can't help you understand though. You have to do that on your own. |  |
|  |
| US election observations on 11:59 - Nov 10 with 873 views | A_Fans_Dad |
| US election observations on 20:33 - Nov 9 by FieryJack | Point of order: when you start a new paragraph, please leave a line break. And it's Russia, not russia. It's little things like this that prevent you from being taken seriously (by me, anyway). |
I should give a flying anything what you think. Why don't you stick to the forum where the posters care what you post? By the way, you are a classic Internet Grammer & Spellcheck Troll. Quote " You know this type of troll. They're the people who always have to tell other users that they have misspelled words and grammar mistakes. Even when they do it by simply commenting with the corrected word behind an asterisk symbol, it's pretty much never a welcomed comment to any discussion. Some of them even use a commenter's spelling and grammar mistakes as an excuse to insult them. " [Post edited 10 Nov 2020 12:13]
|  | |  |
| US election observations on 13:35 - Nov 10 with 857 views | onehunglow |
| US election observations on 11:59 - Nov 10 by A_Fans_Dad | I should give a flying anything what you think. Why don't you stick to the forum where the posters care what you post? By the way, you are a classic Internet Grammer & Spellcheck Troll. Quote " You know this type of troll. They're the people who always have to tell other users that they have misspelled words and grammar mistakes. Even when they do it by simply commenting with the corrected word behind an asterisk symbol, it's pretty much never a welcomed comment to any discussion. Some of them even use a commenter's spelling and grammar mistakes as an excuse to insult them. " [Post edited 10 Nov 2020 12:13]
|
...Im sorry I binned my old kyboafrd as it cused much hilarity on these sombre times |  |
|  |
| US election observations on 16:00 - Nov 10 with 827 views | trampie | Noam speaks. |  |
|  |
| US election observations on 16:21 - Nov 10 with 823 views | Lohengrin |
| US election observations on 16:00 - Nov 10 by trampie | Noam speaks. |
“Obama, first of all, is running the biggest terrorist operation that exists, maybe in history.” Noam Chomsky, 2013. So old Noam thinks Trump is worse than the worst terrorist in history? He must be pretty bad... |  |
| An idea isn't responsible for those who believe in it. |
|  |
| US election observations on 16:59 - Nov 10 with 807 views | trampie |
| US election observations on 16:21 - Nov 10 by Lohengrin | “Obama, first of all, is running the biggest terrorist operation that exists, maybe in history.” Noam Chomsky, 2013. So old Noam thinks Trump is worse than the worst terrorist in history? He must be pretty bad... |
Exactly. |  |
|  | Login to get fewer ads
| US election observations on 18:21 - Nov 10 with 784 views | Boundy | Honestly FFS what a bag of unadulterated horse droppings , even the FWA have a better record. although nowhere near the efficiency of Hitler, Stalin, , Mao Zedong , Pol Pot, Ranavalona I ,Leopold II of Belgium Emperor Hirohito all of whom have much better records. I suggest Noam needs a few history lessons . |  |
| "In a free society, the State is the servant of the people—not the master." |
|  |
| US election observations on 20:33 - Nov 10 with 768 views | Dr_Parnassus |
| US election observations on 16:21 - Nov 10 by Lohengrin | “Obama, first of all, is running the biggest terrorist operation that exists, maybe in history.” Noam Chomsky, 2013. So old Noam thinks Trump is worse than the worst terrorist in history? He must be pretty bad... |
|  |
|  |
| |