| The ignore button 18:37 - Jan 10 with 1901 views | onehunglow |
I find myself now collecting a fine selection of posters who won’t be getting any time from me ever in future. It’s not easy to actually ignore but it’s like a good evacuation of bowels when constipated with outright drivel .
Many others doing it.? |  |
| |  |
| The ignore button on 18:39 - Jan 10 with 1306 views | jojaca |
I am accidentally putting people on ignore because of my fat thumb. |  |
| Even when you know, you never know? |
| |
| The ignore button on 18:40 - Jan 10 with 1267 views | Dr_Parnassus |
Never used it and never will.
I like to hear what everyone has to say regardless of how crazy it is. |  |
| |
| The ignore button on 18:46 - Jan 10 with 1291 views | onehunglow |
| The ignore button on 18:40 - Jan 10 by Dr_Parnassus |
Never used it and never will.
I like to hear what everyone has to say regardless of how crazy it is. |
No. Dr Pr,not for me anymore
Nobody is going to change their views after re@ding matters posted on a fans forum.
I am perma banned from PS so this is all I have.
Moreover I no longer go to games @and won’t until Martin is removed.
It’s purely personal.
It’s not easy as I like the trips in the north .
Thirty years ago,I went on my own and when Russ goes maybe I ll find my fervour again but Martin has killed my spirit . | |
| |
| The ignore button on 09:53 - Jan 11 with 1174 views | controversial_jack |
| The ignore button on 18:46 - Jan 10 by onehunglow |
No. Dr Pr,not for me anymore
Nobody is going to change their views after re@ding matters posted on a fans forum.
I am perma banned from PS so this is all I have.
Moreover I no longer go to games @and won’t until Martin is removed.
It’s purely personal.
It’s not easy as I like the trips in the north .
Thirty years ago,I went on my own and when Russ goes maybe I ll find my fervour again but Martin has killed my spirit . |
I don't think this guy is suited to social media forums.He doesn't quite get it.
I'm sure he has me on iggy and a few others too. It doesn't bother me i keep posting regardless | | | |
| The ignore button on 10:56 - Jan 11 with 1166 views | swan65split |
No,
I just wont reply If i dont want two.
also who wants two miss a possible court case scenario......  |  | | |
| The ignore button on 13:06 - Jan 12 with 1077 views | STID2017 |
Seems the only way to avoid abuse and arguments sadly |  |
| |
| The ignore button on 13:07 - Jan 12 with 1075 views | STID2017 |
| The ignore button on 10:56 - Jan 11 by swan65split |
No,
I just wont reply If i dont want two.
also who wants two miss a possible court case scenario...... |
Do that with most but some go beyond the pale | |
| |
| The ignore button on 13:38 - Jan 12 with 1069 views | builthjack |
| The ignore button on 13:06 - Jan 12 by STID2017 |
Seems the only way to avoid abuse and arguments sadly |
Ignore is the best with the twit. |  |
| Swansea Indepenent Poster Of The Year 2021. Dr P / Mart66 / Roathie / Parlay / E20/ Duffle was 2nd, but he is deluded and thinks in his little twisted brain that he won. Poor sod. We let him win this year, as he has cried for a whole year. His 14 usernames, bless his cotton socks.
|
| |
Login to get fewer ads
| The ignore button on 15:46 - Jan 12 with 1027 views | waynekerr55 |
| The ignore button on 18:46 - Jan 10 by onehunglow |
No. Dr Pr,not for me anymore
Nobody is going to change their views after re@ding matters posted on a fans forum.
I am perma banned from PS so this is all I have.
Moreover I no longer go to games @and won’t until Martin is removed.
It’s purely personal.
It’s not easy as I like the trips in the north .
Thirty years ago,I went on my own and when Russ goes maybe I ll find my fervour again but Martin has killed my spirit . |
I hope you won't be @adding me to any of those LISTS |  |
| |
| The ignore button on 16:12 - Jan 12 with 996 views | waynekerr55 |
| The ignore button on 18:39 - Jan 10 by jojaca |
I am accidentally putting people on ignore because of my fat thumb. |
 | |
| |
| The ignore button on 16:31 - Jan 12 with 984 views | SullutaCreturned |
| The ignore button on 13:38 - Jan 12 by builthjack |
Ignore is the best with the twit. |
Now now, I'm sure you meant to say "with ANY twit" because we don't want to break any site rules do we?
Anybody deliberatley breaking site rules will be dealt with in due course, I'm sure.
Let the Entente Cordiale continue. | | | |
| The ignore button on 17:29 - Jan 12 with 944 views | JACKMANANDBOY |
I have a small number of posters on ignore, they tend to post the same stuff over and over again. Having them on ignore saves time. |  |
| |
| The ignore button on 18:26 - Jan 12 with 898 views | Flashberryjack |
I don't have any poster on ignore, but I do ignore a few posters on here, if that makes sense. |  |
| |
| The ignore button on 19:05 - Jan 12 with 878 views | SullutaCreturned |
| The ignore button on 18:26 - Jan 12 by Flashberryjack |
I don't have any poster on ignore, but I do ignore a few posters on here, if that makes sense. |
I have one poster on ignore for the reason jackmanandboy gave. My resolve not to ignore anybody was tested and I failed! | | | |
| The ignore button on 19:12 - Jan 12 with 871 views | builthjack |
| The ignore button on 19:05 - Jan 12 by SullutaCreturned |
I have one poster on ignore for the reason jackmanandboy gave. My resolve not to ignore anybody was tested and I failed! |
Probably the same one as a lot of others | |
| Swansea Indepenent Poster Of The Year 2021. Dr P / Mart66 / Roathie / Parlay / E20/ Duffle was 2nd, but he is deluded and thinks in his little twisted brain that he won. Poor sod. We let him win this year, as he has cried for a whole year. His 14 usernames, bless his cotton socks.
|
| |
| The ignore button on 19:44 - Jan 12 with 855 views | onehunglow |
| The ignore button on 15:46 - Jan 12 by waynekerr55 |
I hope you won't be @adding me to any of those LISTS |
Goes without saying may dAft bugger.
Miss our threesome with Warwick.
I’ve lost his phone number too soI don’t get called a Cent so much .
He got affected by frckwit fatigue .
It’s not easy ignoring but it’s easier on the eye .
I’ve changed …. | |
| |
| The ignore button on 19:49 - Jan 12 with 827 views | Dr_Parnassus |
| The ignore button on 19:12 - Jan 12 by builthjack |
Probably the same one as a lot of others |
Who? | |
| |
| The ignore button on 22:44 - Jan 12 with 749 views | STID2017 |
| The ignore button on 18:39 - Jan 10 by jojaca |
I am accidentally putting people on ignore because of my fat thumb. |
A common problem, especially on smartphones  | |
| |
| The ignore button on 22:53 - Jan 12 with 737 views | Dr_Parnassus |
| The ignore button on 16:31 - Jan 12 by SullutaCreturned |
Now now, I'm sure you meant to say "with ANY twit" because we don't want to break any site rules do we?
Anybody deliberatley breaking site rules will be dealt with in due course, I'm sure.
Let the Entente Cordiale continue. |
You noted the abuse too?
Wonder if it will be dealt with, not going to report of course but I’m sure it will be seen.
This repeated behaviour by a certain few individuals designed to garner argument is something that certainly needs addressing. | |
| |
| The ignore button on 23:24 - Jan 12 with 728 views | STID2017 |
Is saying "a twit", "any twit" or even " a certain twit" classed as abuse ?
I cannot honestly believe anyone can feel offended by this.
Even a four year old in nursery would not be admonished for saying this surely ?
Perhaps Admin needs to create a thesaurus of unacceptable words or phrases so as to avoid any misunderstandings when seemingly innocent words or phrases are taken as abuse ?
Seems there are some sensitive souls on here ? | |
| |
| The ignore button on 23:31 - Jan 12 with 721 views | Dr_Parnassus |
| The ignore button on 23:24 - Jan 12 by STID2017 |
Is saying "a twit", "any twit" or even " a certain twit" classed as abuse ?
I cannot honestly believe anyone can feel offended by this.
Even a four year old in nursery would not be admonished for saying this surely ?
Perhaps Admin needs to create a thesaurus of unacceptable words or phrases so as to avoid any misunderstandings when seemingly innocent words or phrases are taken as abuse ?
Seems there are some sensitive souls on here ? |
So you are saying I’m able to call you a twit and you will be okay with it?
To put that into perspective, I was banned for about 2 weeks for saying a moronic view was moronic.
They seem pretty similar.
So the question shouldn’t be about whether I’m offended (I’m rarely offended by words on a screen) and more a question around consistency.
I’m more than happy for people to be allowed to call other twits. But I have a feeling if I started using that then others would begin to dislike such a pejorative.
If I can use it, I’m cool with everyone being allowed. That’s my view, I just don’t like situations where others can use such personal language and others can’t. If it’s consistent standard, then call me whatever you like as long as I can have it in my repertoire, all good with me.
But I am pretty certain there would be complaints if I had called you a twit or something similar in an unprovoked goading post such as the one we are discussing. [Post edited 12 Jan 2023 23:44]
| |
| |
| The ignore button on 08:07 - Jan 13 with 664 views | magicdaps10 |
| The ignore button on 22:53 - Jan 12 by Dr_Parnassus |
You noted the abuse too?
Wonder if it will be dealt with, not going to report of course but I’m sure it will be seen.
This repeated behaviour by a certain few individuals designed to garner argument is something that certainly needs addressing. |
The vast majority of your posts are done to antagonise or rub people up the wrong way.
There are many but 2 recent ones.
STID responds to Keith regards a post bringing him to the attention a PM has been sent, STID replies back to Keith saying thank you Keith.......for dome reason you respond back to STID saying thank you you STID.
Clear antagonising.
Why you felt like you had to do that, let alone actually post it was just head scratching too say the least.
In the post about Potter, you bring in Tesolven regards a mechanical and license report.....Resolven never even posted on that thread. If the post was made by yourself regards a previous post then it's clear digging at another post and in a post that poster you mention hasn't even posted.
Issue we are having as a site, posters are making certain claims that they are guilty of doing themselves.......the site is constantly giving warnings, deleting posts and locking threads.
Its down to the individual to take control of themselves rather than others because EVERYONE is guilty and EVERYONE has a part to play in it.
If posters think they are not to blame and they haven't done anything then this site or any other online forum isn't really for them.
Food for thought for all here.
My only contribution on the matter, its becoming pathetic once again. |  |
| |
| The ignore button on 08:41 - Jan 13 with 643 views | STID2017 |
| The ignore button on 08:07 - Jan 13 by magicdaps10 |
The vast majority of your posts are done to antagonise or rub people up the wrong way.
There are many but 2 recent ones.
STID responds to Keith regards a post bringing him to the attention a PM has been sent, STID replies back to Keith saying thank you Keith.......for dome reason you respond back to STID saying thank you you STID.
Clear antagonising.
Why you felt like you had to do that, let alone actually post it was just head scratching too say the least.
In the post about Potter, you bring in Tesolven regards a mechanical and license report.....Resolven never even posted on that thread. If the post was made by yourself regards a previous post then it's clear digging at another post and in a post that poster you mention hasn't even posted.
Issue we are having as a site, posters are making certain claims that they are guilty of doing themselves.......the site is constantly giving warnings, deleting posts and locking threads.
Its down to the individual to take control of themselves rather than others because EVERYONE is guilty and EVERYONE has a part to play in it.
If posters think they are not to blame and they haven't done anything then this site or any other online forum isn't really for them.
Food for thought for all here.
My only contribution on the matter, its becoming pathetic once again. |
Totally agree with above.
Even though, following online discussions with John and Keirh, I have agreed to ignore him, it seems clear that he is responding to me in an attempt to
A) Test my resolve to ignore him
B) Draw me into another pathetic argument, with the sole purpose of getting me banned. BTW the recent ban was the only time on any forum ( football or otherwise) since I started dabbling on the internet 21 years ago.
I will not be responding to him.
As you say, we all have a responsibility to maintain order on here.
His posts yesterday and early this morning were clearly phishing attempts with a sole purpose of getting me to respond..
Otherwise why reply to someone who has you on ignore ? | |
| |
| The ignore button on 09:08 - Jan 13 with 632 views | Dr_Parnassus |
| The ignore button on 08:07 - Jan 13 by magicdaps10 |
The vast majority of your posts are done to antagonise or rub people up the wrong way.
There are many but 2 recent ones.
STID responds to Keith regards a post bringing him to the attention a PM has been sent, STID replies back to Keith saying thank you Keith.......for dome reason you respond back to STID saying thank you you STID.
Clear antagonising.
Why you felt like you had to do that, let alone actually post it was just head scratching too say the least.
In the post about Potter, you bring in Tesolven regards a mechanical and license report.....Resolven never even posted on that thread. If the post was made by yourself regards a previous post then it's clear digging at another post and in a post that poster you mention hasn't even posted.
Issue we are having as a site, posters are making certain claims that they are guilty of doing themselves.......the site is constantly giving warnings, deleting posts and locking threads.
Its down to the individual to take control of themselves rather than others because EVERYONE is guilty and EVERYONE has a part to play in it.
If posters think they are not to blame and they haven't done anything then this site or any other online forum isn't really for them.
Food for thought for all here.
My only contribution on the matter, its becoming pathetic once again. |
Absolutely - I always reply to goading posts with a little dig right back at them. But you won’t find me instigating it like you do. I don’t stand for your rubbish or your silly gang, if you want to troll then you have got to work for it, hence why you drive yourself insane.
I am absolutely not to blame for any part at all, and your accusations are futile and duly rejected. I reply to nonsense, not start it. Same goes for your Resolven example, he is currently on a trolling mission surrounding the Sala and trying to make a case that Cardiff should be compensated despite not understanding the case at all, a quip about a taxi was wonderful humour, sorry if you didn’t agree.
You have spent the last 2 weeks accusing me of being other posters so I’m afraid you have absolutely no leg to stand on when you talk about other people antagonising others, it’s what you exist on here to do. I just reply.
“What’s the saying Keith? Smoke and mirrors”?
What a twit… (assume this is accepted fare now?).
Maybe if you stopped spending you life trying to get a rise out of people on here your views on it may hold a bit more water, as it stands you just look like a hypocrite.
I am perfectly happy with the way I post and will continue to reply to utter nonsense designed to goad (like your very post here). I change nothing - the sooner you realise this the better for us all.
The ignore function is there if you have a problem, use it. [Post edited 13 Jan 2023 9:16]
| |
| |
| The ignore button on 09:10 - Jan 13 with 631 views | Dr_Parnassus |
| The ignore button on 08:41 - Jan 13 by STID2017 |
Totally agree with above.
Even though, following online discussions with John and Keirh, I have agreed to ignore him, it seems clear that he is responding to me in an attempt to
A) Test my resolve to ignore him
B) Draw me into another pathetic argument, with the sole purpose of getting me banned. BTW the recent ban was the only time on any forum ( football or otherwise) since I started dabbling on the internet 21 years ago.
I will not be responding to him.
As you say, we all have a responsibility to maintain order on here.
His posts yesterday and early this morning were clearly phishing attempts with a sole purpose of getting me to respond..
Otherwise why reply to someone who has you on ignore ? |
I couldn’t care less if you have me on ignore, I’ve made it clear several times that what you do will not affect the way I use the site.
If you wish to ignore me then go for your life, doesn’t mean I have to ignore you though, and I won’t. | |
| |
| |
By continuing to use the site, you agree to our use of cookies and to abide by our Terms and Conditions.
