Please log in or register. Registered visitors get fewer ads.
Forum index | Previous Thread | Next thread
The Wild Rovers Match Fred 18:41 - Nov 2 with 30046 viewsSimonJames

(I can't see anyone else having started one)

I going for a tentative 0-3 (Eze, Luongo, Hemed)

100% of people who drink water will die.

-1
The Wild Rovers Match Fred on 16:52 - Nov 3 with 2714 viewsBrianMcCarthy

Toni does well again.

Now a corner for them.

"The opposite of love, after all, is not hate, but indifference."
Poll: Player of the Year (so far)

0
The Wild Rovers Match Fred on 16:53 - Nov 3 with 2663 viewsBrianMcCarthy

Another corner through keep-ball at the flag.

"The opposite of love, after all, is not hate, but indifference."
Poll: Player of the Year (so far)

0
The Wild Rovers Match Fred on 16:53 - Nov 3 with 2661 viewsrsonist

The Wild Rovers Match Fred on 16:52 - Nov 3 by kensalriser

Well that won't be doing his prospects any favours.


Definitely not. Second time he's fkced it under McClaren after that sending off.
0
The Wild Rovers Match Fred on 16:53 - Nov 3 with 2656 viewseghamranger

Manning scores 2 pens for Rotherham
0
The Wild Rovers Match Fred on 16:53 - Nov 3 with 2619 viewsBklynRanger

Stupid fcuking tackle and he was really good until then.
0
The Wild Rovers Match Fred on 16:54 - Nov 3 with 2505 viewsBrianMcCarthy

Rangers attack. No joy.

8 yellows now. Didn't see the last two.

"The opposite of love, after all, is not hate, but indifference."
Poll: Player of the Year (so far)

0
The Wild Rovers Match Fred on 16:57 - Nov 3 with 2284 viewsPinnerPaul

On to Brentford, still only 3 pts form 6th
0
The Wild Rovers Match Fred on 16:58 - Nov 3 with 2202 viewsBklynRanger

Lumley just asked Dack a question, presumably about the penalty. Dack made some kind of joke. Lumley told him to fcuk off. Well played Joe.
0
Login to get fewer ads

The Wild Rovers Match Fred on 16:58 - Nov 3 with 2195 viewsBrianMcCarthy

FT.

I think that 1-0 is probably fair as we were poor for three-quarters and only L&L&L played well for us. Rangel ok, Bidwell had little to do. Scowen ok but left exposed by Luongo and Freeman to often. Midfield beaten, passing poor, Eze had an off-day, Wells too. Sideline also far too slow to make changes.

Ironic that the goal game during our only decent period but we didn't really deserve much out of that. We have to be honest.

"The opposite of love, after all, is not hate, but indifference."
Poll: Player of the Year (so far)

0
The Wild Rovers Match Fred on 17:00 - Nov 3 with 2150 viewsPinnerPaul

The Wild Rovers Match Fred on 16:58 - Nov 3 by BrianMcCarthy

FT.

I think that 1-0 is probably fair as we were poor for three-quarters and only L&L&L played well for us. Rangel ok, Bidwell had little to do. Scowen ok but left exposed by Luongo and Freeman to often. Midfield beaten, passing poor, Eze had an off-day, Wells too. Sideline also far too slow to make changes.

Ironic that the goal game during our only decent period but we didn't really deserve much out of that. We have to be honest.


Cheers Brian, thanks for the updates.
1
The Wild Rovers Match Fred on 17:01 - Nov 3 with 2130 viewsvegasranger

Was on the Blackburn feed and they felt we were a very cynical, time wasting team from the off. Poor game and I can't see the point of Smith. How many fouls did he give in the short time he was on? Time to give Oteh a chance from the bench?
0
The Wild Rovers Match Fred on 17:02 - Nov 3 with 2092 viewsqprd

The Wild Rovers Match Fred on 17:01 - Nov 3 by vegasranger

Was on the Blackburn feed and they felt we were a very cynical, time wasting team from the off. Poor game and I can't see the point of Smith. How many fouls did he give in the short time he was on? Time to give Oteh a chance from the bench?


At what point does Samuel play?
0
The Wild Rovers Match Fred on 17:04 - Nov 3 with 2067 viewsBoston

The Wild Rovers Match Fred on 17:01 - Nov 3 by vegasranger

Was on the Blackburn feed and they felt we were a very cynical, time wasting team from the off. Poor game and I can't see the point of Smith. How many fouls did he give in the short time he was on? Time to give Oteh a chance from the bench?


He was on to defend a point.

Poll: Thank God The Seaons Over.

0
The Wild Rovers Match Fred on 17:05 - Nov 3 with 2055 viewsWatford_Ranger

The Wild Rovers Match Fred on 16:47 - Nov 3 by kensalriser

Hate that shit when some idiot blows a hard fought point with a stupid challenge.


Sounds like it was soft. Easier to give to a home side.
0
The Wild Rovers Match Fred on 17:06 - Nov 3 with 2039 viewsPinnerPaul

The Wild Rovers Match Fred on 17:02 - Nov 3 by qprd

At what point does Samuel play?


Here we go.

In answer to your question, when the players in front of him are consistently poor - that's how it works - clearly - up until today, total madness to change a winning team.


Even after today - stick with same 11 (barring injuries and Cameron being fit) - one of the reasons for the run is consistent team selection.
1
The Wild Rovers Match Fred on 17:08 - Nov 3 with 1990 viewsCiderwithRsie

Bugrit and all that. I'd have happily taken a grim 0-0 for an away point and continuing the run of clean sheets, and I actually give McClaren some credit for dman near pulling it off. Especially since it is now November, traditional month of sh*te at QPR.

I won't lose too much sleep so long as we learn from it.
2
The Wild Rovers Match Fred on 17:10 - Nov 3 with 1957 viewsvegasranger

The Wild Rovers Match Fred on 17:06 - Nov 3 by PinnerPaul

Here we go.

In answer to your question, when the players in front of him are consistently poor - that's how it works - clearly - up until today, total madness to change a winning team.


Even after today - stick with same 11 (barring injuries and Cameron being fit) - one of the reasons for the run is consistent team selection.


I think qprd was answering my point about bringing Smith. Not about the starting eleven.
0
The Wild Rovers Match Fred on 17:13 - Nov 3 with 1909 viewsqueensparker

The Wild Rovers Match Fred on 17:05 - Nov 3 by Watford_Ranger

Sounds like it was soft. Easier to give to a home side.


It wasn’t soft, it was pretty blatant and a stupid, unnecessary challenge. A real shame as game had 0-0 all over it until then which would have been a great result up there with Eze/Wells/Freeman all off the boil today
2
The Wild Rovers Match Fred on 17:14 - Nov 3 with 1896 viewsPinnerPaul

The Wild Rovers Match Fred on 17:10 - Nov 3 by vegasranger

I think qprd was answering my point about bringing Smith. Not about the starting eleven.


Fair enough , but up to today, you could say the same about Chair and still can about Smyth.

As I said above, we can only play 11 + 3 and take 18, so always those that miss out.

I'm happy with where we are - always going to lose/win games 1-0 in this div - some you deserve some not.

Important thing now is to get back to winning ways v Brentford.
1
The Wild Rovers Match Fred on 17:14 - Nov 3 with 1895 viewsWatford_Ranger

The Wild Rovers Match Fred on 17:02 - Nov 3 by qprd

At what point does Samuel play?


Would you drop Freeman or Pawel for him? I wouldn’t.
0
The Wild Rovers Match Fred on 17:23 - Nov 3 with 1799 viewsqprd

The Wild Rovers Match Fred on 17:04 - Nov 3 by Boston

He was on to defend a point.


I’ll caveat this comment by noting I wasn’t at the match and hardly followed

But we’re safe from relegation

If we kept the status quo or went defensive, we could hold on for 1 point.
If we go for the win and actually succeed, that’s 3 points (+2). If in doing so, we expose ourselves and concede, we get 0 points (-1 from base case). The point is that the upside (+2 points) is greater than the downside (-1 point)

We’re not going down so we don’t need to cynically try to hold on for a point to keep ourselves safe

Why not just go for it? Bring in bright etc

It’s admittedly a bit simplistic of an analysis, but I don’t understand the negativity. We’re in form so why not have a go?
0
The Wild Rovers Match Fred on 17:28 - Nov 3 with 1771 viewsqprd

The Wild Rovers Match Fred on 17:14 - Nov 3 by Watford_Ranger

Would you drop Freeman or Pawel for him? I wouldn’t.


No

But he’s an explosive player who can lead a counterattack. If you want to drop deep and play cynically, he’s an outball with his temendous pace

He’s nowhere near pav or Luke at the moment

However he will be an important piece of our squad going forward . Pav is a free agent in the summer and Luke may be sold. Wouldn’t it be nice to give BOS some reps now so he’s ready to contribut sooner rather than later: He will only improve if he plays, and 15-20 minutes cameos will help him. But even putting aside The developmental angle, he’s good enough to play now and contribute.
0
The Wild Rovers Match Fred on 17:30 - Nov 3 with 1756 viewsBklynRanger

The Wild Rovers Match Fred on 17:14 - Nov 3 by Watford_Ranger

Would you drop Freeman or Pawel for him? I wouldn’t.


Not asked of me I know, but if one was tiring or underperforming on the 70 min mark I would. Moreso for Pav than Luke based on the set piece reliance.

Also Smith got stitched up a couple of times in the short time he was on - below average refs make a habit of believing that he's backing in when be clearly isn't.
1
The Wild Rovers Match Fred on 17:31 - Nov 3 with 1750 viewsBrianMcCarthy

The Wild Rovers Match Fred on 17:00 - Nov 3 by PinnerPaul

Cheers Brian, thanks for the updates.


No hassle, Paul.

"The opposite of love, after all, is not hate, but indifference."
Poll: Player of the Year (so far)

0
The Wild Rovers Match Fred on 17:36 - Nov 3 with 1708 viewsdavman

The Wild Rovers Match Fred on 17:13 - Nov 3 by queensparker

It wasn’t soft, it was pretty blatant and a stupid, unnecessary challenge. A real shame as game had 0-0 all over it until then which would have been a great result up there with Eze/Wells/Freeman all off the boil today


Looked soft to me from the highlights Sky have just posted up.

Can we go out yet?
Poll: What would you take for Willock if a bid comes this month?

0
About Us Contact Us Terms & Conditions Privacy Cookies Advertising
© FansNetwork 2024