By continuing to use the site, you agree to our use of cookies and to abide by our Terms and Conditions. We in turn value your personal details in accordance with our Privacy Policy.
Please log in or register. Registered visitors get fewer ads.
Stuchbery lies for a living. All you are seeing here is the serve being returned and he doesn’t like it one little bit. One minute Robinson is a “tool of the establishment” the next he’s running to the Police, ‘the establishment,’ because here comes somebody who won’t play the role of cowed victim of their “dirty tricks.”
I don’t know how much you know about H n H or the reasons behind their split from Searchlight, Eb? It’s an amusing tale of the bitter, internecine squabbling of the far left pitting venemous ideologues against would-be gangsters, drug dealers and pederasts, taking in police grasses, MI5 moles, prostituted hacks and debased MPs en route. I’m not entirely sure just yet where Stuchbery sits in this less than starry firmament but he’ll no doubt be there dimly twinkling.
Absolute bollocks Loh.
Yaxley-Lennon didn't like having a taste of his own medicine. History book will tell you that these types don't last long.
Powell, Mosely, Lennon - 3 peas in pod and skilled at duping the hard of thinking.
Because a lot of the researchers, producers etc... went to Uni with the H n H crowd, drank together at the same Students’ Union bars, went on the same demos, shared bongs together in tents at Glastonbury, caught crabs from the same frightful, hayrick-haired leftie harridan?
Just a thought...
[Post edited 5 Mar 2019 16:04]
Ebo dyes his hair like that. FACT
The first ever recipient of a Planet Swans Lifetime Achievement Award.
I'd rather support a racist than a terrorist.. unless Robinson starts blowing up mosques and stuff..
A couple on this thread seem to think the coppers touting H&K semi-automatic rifles outside the Liberty are there to protect us from Tommy Robinson and Lucy Brown.
I am still cogitating on the surreal thought that Mosley, Powell and Robinson are peas in a pod!
The issue to me remains that the BBC went way over the line, and that it was no accident.
A couple on this thread seem to think the coppers touting H&K semi-automatic rifles outside the Liberty are there to protect us from Tommy Robinson and Lucy Brown.
I am still cogitating on the surreal thought that Mosley, Powell and Robinson are peas in a pod!
The issue to me remains that the BBC went way over the line, and that it was no accident.
Just watched it.. it was a definite propaganda driven vehicle..
”He's not having his freedom of speech controlled though.”
If you managed to keep a straight face typing that you’re a rock, sir, an island.
It reminds me whenever a labour shadow minister or MP tries to speak on question time and gets spoken over by the “moderator “. All done in the greatest democracy on the planet. Laughable
Each time I go to Bedd - au........................
Its laughable that the whole problem of terrorising the uk are these dirty colourful people.
Wake up ffs
Yes. Just wait until the ultra left Trotskies get another sniff of power. Theyll dig out the mouldy brown shirts and threaten all and every non-comrade around.
"Michu, Britton and Williams could have won 3-0 on their own. They wouldn't have required a keeper."
“Hard of thinking” is this the opposite of soft headed?
It has been repeated on this thread, sounds like its own little bit of hate speech. Which is quite ironic really.
It is like those that arrogantly declare they don’t suffer fools gladly, but are amusingly often so lacking in self awareness, that they fail to consider one of the biggest most arrogant and prejudicial fools may be inhabiting their own skin.
Shame if abuse is the sharpest tool in the box, it detracts from any actual merit in the point you are obviously struggling to make. I always thought intelligent debate was about listening to the other side then countering or (god forbid) conceding to their arguments, as well as powerfully making your own points.
If anything is to be resolved you need to fairly understand the hopes and fears of both sides.
Treading on people, shouting them down, abusing them for whatever reason may make some feel good / smug, but it is seldom a successful long term solution. Neither is signing players the manager has never heard of ;) (just slipped that in to see if Itchy was still paying attention)
Discounting your opponents as fools is a serious mistake. Calling them fools and other abuse only makes your argument look bereft of meritorious substance and potentially makes a fool of you.
Regardless of what Yaxley-Lennon says or thinks, he is still a far right buffoon with the intelligence of a slug.
As long as he is called far right by the far left the impasse will continue. He is right wing, granted but he is no racist, fascist or Nazi. But we've been here before.
[Post edited 6 Mar 2019 12:42]
Nolan sympathiser, clout expert, personal friend of Leigh Dineen, advocate and enforcer of porridge swallows.
The official inventor of the tit w@nk.
“Hard of thinking” is this the opposite of soft headed?
It has been repeated on this thread, sounds like its own little bit of hate speech. Which is quite ironic really.
It is like those that arrogantly declare they don’t suffer fools gladly, but are amusingly often so lacking in self awareness, that they fail to consider one of the biggest most arrogant and prejudicial fools may be inhabiting their own skin.
Shame if abuse is the sharpest tool in the box, it detracts from any actual merit in the point you are obviously struggling to make. I always thought intelligent debate was about listening to the other side then countering or (god forbid) conceding to their arguments, as well as powerfully making your own points.
If anything is to be resolved you need to fairly understand the hopes and fears of both sides.
Treading on people, shouting them down, abusing them for whatever reason may make some feel good / smug, but it is seldom a successful long term solution. Neither is signing players the manager has never heard of ;) (just slipped that in to see if Itchy was still paying attention)
Discounting your opponents as fools is a serious mistake. Calling them fools and other abuse only makes your argument look bereft of meritorious substance and potentially makes a fool of you.
Yeah the default position appears to be “If I agree with you you’re a highly intelligent borderline genius, but if I disagree you’re a retarded spazmoid troglodyte.”
You see it on here every day. Especially on the brexit thread.
The creatures outside looked from pig to man, and from man to pig, and from pig to man again; but already it was impossible to say which was which.
As long as he is called far right by the far left the impasse will continue. He is right wing, granted but he is no racist, fascist or Nazi. But we've been here before.
[Post edited 6 Mar 2019 12:42]
Of course he is a racist. He tars all Muslims with the same brush. That is a form of racism.
By continuing to use the site, you agree to our use of cookies and to abide by our Terms and Conditions.
