By continuing to use the site, you agree to our use of cookies and to abide by our Terms and Conditions. We in turn value your personal details in accordance with our Privacy Policy.
Please log in or register. Registered visitors get fewer ads.
Extinction Rebellion activists failed in a plan to spray HM Treasury with thousands of litres of fake blood this morning after their high-pressure hose pipe became too much to handle.
Look at these tossers from extinction rebellion on 13:15 - Oct 10 by londonlisa2001
The problem with political discourse in this country (and others for that matter) is that everything is now presented in terms of a black and white choice. Environment or having 21st century stuff, stay in the EU or have no deals with the EU. It’s easier for sound bites (you’re either with us or against us), easier for people to find an extreme position to make fun of in supposed support of their argument, easier for the social media bots to do their thing.
But it’s making the arguments stupid and childlike. And getting us nowhere as the majority of people are somewhat centrist in their views, appreciate that there is nuance and there is often no absolute right and absolute wrong. And yet we are all having to ‘pick sides’ because of the presentation of arguments.
So this thread rapidly degenerates into ‘if you support calls for a cleaner energy policy, less use of fossil fuels, a desire for increased use of renewables, generally less polluting, less plastic, less palm oil etc etc, then you’re a hypocrite if you ever fly or drive or even use a phone’.
The brexit thread degenerates into ‘if you want to remain, you must believe the EU is a perfect organisation’.
Trump threads degenerate into ‘if you don’t support him you must be a degenerate libtard lefty who wants to see old people accosted by antifa’.
It’s moronic.
Where do the witchfinder generals fits into all of this...
I want a mate like Flashberryjacks, who wears a Barnsley jersey with "Swans are my second team" on the back.
Look at these tossers from extinction rebellion on 12:43 - Oct 10 by A_Fans_Dad
As you have posted this video of the foul mouthed and abusive rant without comment I assume that you approve of it. Or think that in some way it enhances the worthiness of ER, or in some way lessons the right of people to call them hypocrites. I suppose it shows the level of your mentallity. I expect to see all the ER supporters on here to pile on with agreement of how wonderful the video is.
Honestly, I've no answer to that. I wouldn't even know where to begin.
1
Look at these tossers from extinction rebellion on 16:01 - Oct 10 with 1449 views
Look at these tossers from extinction rebellion on 16:12 - Oct 10 by Lohengrin
He plays The Grand now and again. Have you seen him?
No I haven’t. I’d love to though, just to channel my inner puerile. He must be a wreck by now mind, can’t imagine he’ll be around much longer. He’s not looking too good on videos from a decade or more ago.
0
Look at these tossers from extinction rebellion on 14:10 - Oct 11 with 1255 views
The Andrew Neil Interview should be compulsory veiwing for every class in every school in the world. It would allow the children to understand that the nice St Greta and Exctinction Rebellion are lying to them to frighten them into helping them. According to the Scientific data their are no Billions of deaths, nor Millions of Deaths, but there are Thousands of deaths from Natural Disasters. But the good news is that it is down by 95% since the 19th century.
All you people who think that the world is ending watch it and learn, nothing like information to dispell the fear propogated by liars.
-1
Look at these tossers from extinction rebellion on 11:59 - Oct 12 with 1088 views
Look at these tossers from extinction rebellion on 10:14 - Oct 12 by A_Fans_Dad
The Andrew Neil Interview should be compulsory veiwing for every class in every school in the world. It would allow the children to understand that the nice St Greta and Exctinction Rebellion are lying to them to frighten them into helping them. According to the Scientific data their are no Billions of deaths, nor Millions of Deaths, but there are Thousands of deaths from Natural Disasters. But the good news is that it is down by 95% since the 19th century.
All you people who think that the world is ending watch it and learn, nothing like information to dispell the fear propogated by liars.
So the fact less people die from natural disasters than 119 to 219 years ago is proof that the environment is doing fine?
We should make you compulsory viewing for every school in the world as evidence of the danger of not working hard in school.
You know, Hobbes, some days even my lucky rocket ship underpants don't help.
4
Look at these tossers from extinction rebellion on 13:16 - Oct 12 with 1054 views
Look at these tossers from extinction rebellion on 16:16 - Oct 12 by Flashberryjack
What about the massive hole in the ozone layer? thousands will perish.
What only thousands, you have to do better than that, how about millions to start with and then we can up it further when nobody jumps to put it right.
oh hang on they all ready did that, but it didn't make the slightest difference as it is completely natural. In fact Atmospheric Ozone over Antarctica has hardly moved since the 1987 Montreal Protocol, it was about 150DU then and it still about the same now.
Of course those scientist must have been right it just had to be CFCs, Bromine & Chlorine Dioxide didn't it? That NASA page doesn't seem to realise the contradiction of what their graphs shows compared to the words they write. The reduction of CFCs etc shown here doesn't seem to have proved the theory.
Look at these tossers from extinction rebellion on 17:15 - Oct 12 by A_Fans_Dad
What only thousands, you have to do better than that, how about millions to start with and then we can up it further when nobody jumps to put it right.
oh hang on they all ready did that, but it didn't make the slightest difference as it is completely natural. In fact Atmospheric Ozone over Antarctica has hardly moved since the 1987 Montreal Protocol, it was about 150DU then and it still about the same now.
Of course those scientist must have been right it just had to be CFCs, Bromine & Chlorine Dioxide didn't it? That NASA page doesn't seem to realise the contradiction of what their graphs shows compared to the words they write. The reduction of CFCs etc shown here doesn't seem to have proved the theory.
By continuing to use the site, you agree to our use of cookies and to abide by our Terms and Conditions.
