| MOTM 22:13 - Jan 7 with 3795 views | swan_si |
why is "man of the match" now called "player of the match", I mean it's played with 22 men, 23 if you include the ref, on the pitch.  |  | | |  |
| MOTM on 22:20 - Jan 7 with 2025 views | Whiterockin |
You also have player of the match in women's football. |  | | |
| MOTM on 22:32 - Jan 7 with 1991 views | swan_si |
| MOTM on 22:20 - Jan 7 by Whiterockin |
You also have player of the match in women's football. |
In the mens game its always been MOTM, why change it now, if its a game with mixed sex teams then I can understand it. | | | |
| MOTM on 22:37 - Jan 7 with 1977 views | Whiterockin |
| MOTM on 22:32 - Jan 7 by swan_si |
In the mens game its always been MOTM, why change it now, if its a game with mixed sex teams then I can understand it. |
I explained in my post above. | | | |
| MOTM on 22:45 - Jan 7 with 1957 views | swan_si |
| MOTM on 22:37 - Jan 7 by Whiterockin |
I explained in my post above. |
Actually you explained nothing. Stating its done in the women's game is not an explanation. I asked why has it changed from MOTM to POTM when its played by men. | | | |
| MOTM on 23:12 - Jan 7 with 1916 views | GixerJack |
| MOTM on 22:45 - Jan 7 by swan_si |
Actually you explained nothing. Stating its done in the women's game is not an explanation. I asked why has it changed from MOTM to POTM when its played by men. |
Just be glad it hasn’t changed to Player Of Soccer Match |  | | |
| MOTM on 23:14 - Jan 7 with 1915 views | JACKMANANDBOY |
Fashion, equivalence between men and women. A bit like batters in cricket |  |
| |
| MOTM on 23:17 - Jan 7 with 1896 views | raynor94 |
| MOTM on 22:32 - Jan 7 by swan_si |
In the mens game its always been MOTM, why change it now, if its a game with mixed sex teams then I can understand it. |
It's just sheer madness, I still remember the women's euros, when the commentator said White needed 1 goal to equal Rooney's record |  |
| |
| MOTM on 23:48 - Jan 7 with 1865 views | STID2017 |
| MOTM on 22:37 - Jan 7 by Whiterockin |
I explained in my post above. |
I agree though no need to change it in all Male games |  |
| |
Login to get fewer ads
| MOTM on 02:21 - Jan 8 with 1801 views | Dr_Parnassus |
| MOTM on 22:37 - Jan 7 by Whiterockin |
I explained in my post above. |
You didn’t, you explained why it was that way in the women’s game.
But men are still men last time I checked.
Although the line is increasingly and internationally getting blurred. |  |
| |
| MOTM on 04:47 - Jan 8 with 1814 views | angryjack |
Because in this crazy messed up world,someone might identify themselves as a Mars bar,and it would have to be Mars bar of the match |  | | |
| MOTM on 06:30 - Jan 8 with 1787 views | builthjack |
| MOTM on 04:47 - Jan 8 by angryjack |
Because in this crazy messed up world,someone might identify themselves as a Mars bar,and it would have to be Mars bar of the match |
Battered? |  |
| Swansea Indepenent Poster Of The Year 2021. Dr P / Mart66 / Roathie / Parlay / E20/ Duffle was 2nd, but he is deluded and thinks in his little twisted brain that he won. Poor sod. We let him win this year, as he has cried for a whole year. His 14 usernames, bless his cotton socks.
|
| |
| MOTM on 06:31 - Jan 8 with 1783 views | KeithHaynes |
I thought Man of the match was copyrighted ? |  |
| |
| MOTM on 07:15 - Jan 8 with 1747 views | SullutaCreturned |
Maybe we should change it to.....MVP 
Why can't it stay MOTM in the mens game and be WOTM in the womens game, have we really become that absurd that we are not allowed to differentiate between men and women? | | | |
| MOTM on 07:53 - Jan 8 with 1718 views | Boundy |
| MOTM on 07:15 - Jan 8 by SullutaCreturned |
Maybe we should change it to.....MVP
Why can't it stay MOTM in the mens game and be WOTM in the womens game, have we really become that absurd that we are not allowed to differentiate between men and women? |
In answer to your hypothetical question , yes | |
| "In a free society, the State is the servant of the people—not the master." |
| |
| MOTM on 08:40 - Jan 8 with 1684 views | Sirjohnalot |
Does it really matter ? |  | | |
| MOTM on 08:58 - Jan 8 with 1673 views | CountyJim |
I have refed women's games they use terms like man on and mark your man
They don't have a problem |  | | |
| MOTM on 09:05 - Jan 8 with 1667 views | Gwyn737 |
| MOTM on 08:40 - Jan 8 by Sirjohnalot |
Does it really matter ? |
It doesn’t at all in this instance.
When having discussions on this subject there will be times when it’s really important. This isn’t one of them. | | | |
| MOTM on 09:30 - Jan 8 with 1641 views | swan_si |
| MOTM on 04:47 - Jan 8 by angryjack |
Because in this crazy messed up world,someone might identify themselves as a Mars bar,and it would have to be Mars bar of the match |
I think the lunatics really are taking over the asylum.  | | | |
| MOTM on 09:31 - Jan 8 with 1632 views | swan_si |
| MOTM on 08:40 - Jan 8 by Sirjohnalot |
Does it really matter ? |
it must have mattered to someone otherwise why change it. | | | |
| MOTM on 09:37 - Jan 8 with 1623 views | Sirjohnalot |
| MOTM on 09:31 - Jan 8 by swan_si |
it must have mattered to someone otherwise why change it. |
I’d imagine it was done to make it the same across mens and women’s football, if it becomes the norm to say ‘player of the match ‘ then when it comes to a presenter in the women’s game they don’t say ‘well done you’re man of the match ‘ to them.
Really don’t see a problem | | | |
| MOTM on 09:56 - Jan 8 with 1591 views | Gwyn737 |
| MOTM on 09:37 - Jan 8 by Sirjohnalot |
I’d imagine it was done to make it the same across mens and women’s football, if it becomes the norm to say ‘player of the match ‘ then when it comes to a presenter in the women’s game they don’t say ‘well done you’re man of the match ‘ to them.
Really don’t see a problem |
It’s no a problem and getting excited about simple stuff like this muddies the waters when important parts of the issue need debate. | | | |
| MOTM on 10:46 - Jan 8 with 1549 views | swan_si |
| MOTM on 04:47 - Jan 8 by angryjack |
Because in this crazy messed up world,someone might identify themselves as a Mars bar,and it would have to be Mars bar of the match |
And your Aunt no longer needs balls to be your uncle  | | | |
| MOTM on 11:45 - Jan 8 with 1474 views | Dr_Parnassus |
| MOTM on 08:40 - Jan 8 by Sirjohnalot |
Does it really matter ? |
It does to many, maybe not this specific example, but that’s how the left change language and culture. By doing it slowly and gradually so any pushback they can stop on that specific example and say “but it’s only…. “.
Gender is getting merged and a lot of people feel their identity is being eroded. For example the word mother is banned in some people in place of “birthing person”. These subtle tweaks to language are intentional and culturally important.
This all started with people saying “does it really matter if someone wants to be called whatever they like”… now we have people facing punishment, both financial and societal for not complying.
So it’s about the bigger picture not the issues in isolation. There is absolutely no need to “de-gender” language in the men’s game. | |
| |
| MOTM on 11:53 - Jan 8 with 1477 views | Sirjohnalot |
| MOTM on 11:45 - Jan 8 by Dr_Parnassus |
It does to many, maybe not this specific example, but that’s how the left change language and culture. By doing it slowly and gradually so any pushback they can stop on that specific example and say “but it’s only…. “.
Gender is getting merged and a lot of people feel their identity is being eroded. For example the word mother is banned in some people in place of “birthing person”. These subtle tweaks to language are intentional and culturally important.
This all started with people saying “does it really matter if someone wants to be called whatever they like”… now we have people facing punishment, both financial and societal for not complying.
So it’s about the bigger picture not the issues in isolation. There is absolutely no need to “de-gender” language in the men’s game. |
I disagree but have a lovely day | | | |
| MOTM on 12:03 - Jan 8 with 1444 views | Dr_Parnassus |
| MOTM on 11:53 - Jan 8 by Sirjohnalot |
I disagree but have a lovely day |
Which part do you disagree with? And why?
Otherwise it is coming off as intentionally provocative to keep saying “have a lovely day” while refusing to discuss the point at hand. I assume because you know there is far more to back up what I say than what you say.
As an aside, what I said is not an opinion, it was a fact. People DO feel their identities are being eroded and IT IS due to language change such as this.
That was not something to agree or disagree with. | |
| |
| |
By continuing to use the site, you agree to our use of cookies and to abide by our Terms and Conditions.
