Leeds - James/Montero 10:36 - Jan 13 with 4707 views | 34dfgdf54 | If I’m reading Nixon’s tweet right. Leeds want James, if can’t get him would take Montero. | | | | |
Leeds - James/Montero on 10:45 - Jan 13 with 3559 views | Highjack | Who the hell is this Nixon guy and has he ever got anything right? | |
| |
Leeds - James/Montero on 10:46 - Jan 13 with 3551 views | 34dfgdf54 |
Leeds - James/Montero on 10:45 - Jan 13 by Highjack | Who the hell is this Nixon guy and has he ever got anything right? |
Plenty | | | |
Leeds - James/Montero on 10:50 - Jan 13 with 3521 views | Thrasher6 | Plenty wrong as well... | |
| |
Leeds - James/Montero on 10:53 - Jan 13 with 3504 views | WarwickHunt |
Leeds - James/Montero on 10:45 - Jan 13 by Highjack | Who the hell is this Nixon guy and has he ever got anything right? |
Impeach him! | | | |
Leeds - James/Montero on 11:02 - Jan 13 with 3453 views | LeonWasGod | A simple ‘no thanks’ should put the end to any of that nonsense. Ridiculous idea. | | | |
Leeds - James/Montero on 11:23 - Jan 13 with 3365 views | jasper_T |
Leeds - James/Montero on 10:45 - Jan 13 by Highjack | Who the hell is this Nixon guy and has he ever got anything right? |
Journo for the sun and one of the few that spends most of his time on lower Prem/Football League/Scotland rumours. Doesn't get everything right and I'm sure he's made some stuff up in the past to fill column inches, but clearly does have contacts. Got the Amat and Fede deadline day transfers before anyone else. Not every deal he reports comes off but a good indicator of interest and talks going on. | | | |
Leeds - James/Montero on 11:36 - Jan 13 with 3314 views | sg1912 | Other than our stint in the Premier League, I think every player that's ever been playing well for us has been linked to Leeds at some point. File under lazy journalism. | | | | Login to get fewer ads
Leeds - James/Montero on 11:41 - Jan 13 with 3289 views | dickythorpe | Would any of our team walk straight in to theirs? | | | |
Leeds - James/Montero on 11:42 - Jan 13 with 3283 views | Highjack |
Leeds - James/Montero on 11:41 - Jan 13 by dickythorpe | Would any of our team walk straight in to theirs? |
Pablo Hernandez did. | |
| |
Leeds - James/Montero on 11:42 - Jan 13 with 3278 views | Highjack | Via Qatar obviously. Was a long walk. | |
| |
Leeds - James/Montero on 11:43 - Jan 13 with 3274 views | dickythorpe |
Leeds - James/Montero on 11:42 - Jan 13 by Highjack | Pablo Hernandez did. |
Yeah when they were a div below us. | | | |
Leeds - James/Montero on 11:49 - Jan 13 with 3237 views | dobjack2 | Probably enquiries rather than bids. James should be a quick answer, montero- depends whether they fancy him off the wage bill I suppose. | | | |
Leeds - James/Montero on 11:50 - Jan 13 with 3236 views | theloneranger |
Leeds - James/Montero on 11:41 - Jan 13 by dickythorpe | Would any of our team walk straight in to theirs? |
Leeds bench v Derby ... 5 teenagers and 2 x 20 year olds | |
| Everyday above ground ... Is a good day! 😎 |
| |
Leeds - James/Montero on 11:57 - Jan 13 with 3187 views | jasper_T |
Leeds - James/Montero on 11:50 - Jan 13 by theloneranger | Leeds bench v Derby ... 5 teenagers and 2 x 20 year olds |
Proves you don't need a big squad to succeed in this division. 14/15 is all you really need with well-stocked academy filling the gaps. | | | |
Leeds - James/Montero on 12:15 - Jan 13 with 3101 views | TenbySwan | Leeds have clearly done their spying on our financial situation. Cheeky low bid for James and a cheeky loan did for Montero to get his wages off our books! | | | |
Leeds - James/Montero on 12:22 - Jan 13 with 3055 views | omarjack | Leeds willing to offer 2.5m. If this is true then goodbye James for sure. Also makes me wonder, why on earth did we spend 2m on useless Asoro in the summer then? | |
| |
Leeds - James/Montero on 12:30 - Jan 13 with 3036 views | jasper_T |
Leeds - James/Montero on 12:22 - Jan 13 by omarjack | Leeds willing to offer 2.5m. If this is true then goodbye James for sure. Also makes me wonder, why on earth did we spend 2m on useless Asoro in the summer then? |
You think we'd accept that little? He's on an affordable contract, has 18 months to run and that's less than we took in for much higher earners in the summer. Only Amat was both on a low-ish wage and a low fee, and he'd been wanting to leave for a long while. We turned down more for McBurnie before giving him a new contract, and as you say we paid almost as much for the same level of prospect in the summer (Asoro then vs James now is probably equivalent in reputation). | | | |
Leeds - James/Montero on 12:30 - Jan 13 with 3035 views | jack247 | Cant see them being interested in Montero. Brilliant impact sub, but invariably injured and only has a good 20 minutes in him when he’s fully fit. I’d be worried if they are serious about James. | | | |
Leeds - James/Montero on 12:31 - Jan 13 with 3029 views | Highjack | I think it's fairly obvious that if any sort of bid comes in for any of our players from any team in world football they are gone. | |
| |
Leeds - James/Montero on 12:42 - Jan 13 with 2989 views | leighton1318 | Be crazy not to accept an offer for Jeff. With his injury record, he’s not been value for money for a long while. James - this is a test case - if there is even the hint of a medium term strategy for the club, people like him should be core to it. Surely we are not so desperate that we have to cash him in; and if we are then Roberts, Rodon etc might yet follow., which would have another relegation written all over it. Shifting Bony, even on a free, would probably have almost the same financial effect it be far less disruptive. We’re competitive in this league and maybe two players away from being really up there. Board, or anyone interested in value, have got to realise that consolidating here is the best and cheapest option right now. | | | |
Leeds - James/Montero on 13:00 - Jan 13 with 2909 views | DwightYorkeSuperstar | If James had any sense he'd move. He's not going to get snapped up by a Premier League side playing like he does so his only hope of playing in that league will be if he goes up with a team chasing promotion like Leeds. Why stay here when the fan base thinks our current state is acceptable. God knows what the expectations will be next year when we have tens of millions less. Will people be happy to just stay up as long as we have 60% possession and pass it around our half for most of the game? I suspect they will. | |
| |
Leeds - James/Montero on 13:03 - Jan 13 with 2909 views | Captain_Sham |
Leeds - James/Montero on 12:42 - Jan 13 by leighton1318 | Be crazy not to accept an offer for Jeff. With his injury record, he’s not been value for money for a long while. James - this is a test case - if there is even the hint of a medium term strategy for the club, people like him should be core to it. Surely we are not so desperate that we have to cash him in; and if we are then Roberts, Rodon etc might yet follow., which would have another relegation written all over it. Shifting Bony, even on a free, would probably have almost the same financial effect it be far less disruptive. We’re competitive in this league and maybe two players away from being really up there. Board, or anyone interested in value, have got to realise that consolidating here is the best and cheapest option right now. |
Dan James core to our future? Given his contribution thus far, I certainly hope not. We can do without players who promise much but deliver little. There are plenty of those. | |
| |
Leeds - James/Montero on 13:09 - Jan 13 with 2876 views | hobo | Someone mentioned their winger Jack Clarke in another thread. Perhaps we should reply with a bid of our own, 500k maybe? | | | |
Leeds - James/Montero on 13:17 - Jan 13 with 2846 views | jasper_T |
Leeds - James/Montero on 13:03 - Jan 13 by Captain_Sham | Dan James core to our future? Given his contribution thus far, I certainly hope not. We can do without players who promise much but deliver little. There are plenty of those. |
Strange suggestion when neither of our starting wingers have an assist between them this season. DJ's delivery rate is comparable to many top wingers in this division, which isn't bad for only having played his first dozen or so senior games. | | | |
| |