| Time for the Trust to step in re Siggy. 16:07 - Aug 2 with 4832 views | TheResurrection |
Clement wants him out.
Clement needs to prepare for the season and get replacements in.
The Americans are stubbornly holding out for £50m
But this is having a major wider implication.
The fans. The 21% owners have spoken. The Trust MUST deliver our message immediately.
GET THE DEAL DONE. |  |
| |  |
| Time for the Trust to step in re Siggy. on 18:42 - Aug 2 with 794 views | Jack_Kass |
What fans have spoken? All I've heard is the same person regurgatating the same boring, inane shite, since January.
The emptiest vessel makes the loudest noise |  |
| |
| Time for the Trust to step in re Siggy. on 19:07 - Aug 2 with 739 views | TheResurrection |
Clement has wanted to sell him all along.
You can believe what you like. The above is true.
Deal with it
And as for Highjack's comment re meeting the clubs valuation. The club are split on the subject, hence the ridiculous impasse. The big problem, however, is us being massively under prepared again for the coming season.
Get it done!!! | |
| |
| Time for the Trust to step in re Siggy. on 19:10 - Aug 2 with 720 views | Loyal |
| Time for the Trust to step in re Siggy. on 17:07 - Aug 2 by raynor94 |
I can think of 50 million reasons |
I can think of 40. |  |
| Nolan sympathiser, clout expert, personal friend of Leigh Dineen, advocate and enforcer of porridge swallows.
The official inventor of the tit w@nk. | | Poll: | Who should be Swansea number 1 |
| |
| Time for the Trust to step in re Siggy. on 19:15 - Aug 2 with 692 views | Tummer_from_Texas |
| Time for the Trust to step in re Siggy. on 19:07 - Aug 2 by TheResurrection |
Clement has wanted to sell him all along.
You can believe what you like. The above is true.
Deal with it
And as for Highjack's comment re meeting the clubs valuation. The club are split on the subject, hence the ridiculous impasse. The big problem, however, is us being massively under prepared again for the coming season.
Get it done!!! |
If that's true, then why wasn't Sigurdsson sold in January?
At least 30 million was offered, allegedly. |  |
| |
| Time for the Trust to step in re Siggy. on 19:17 - Aug 2 with 687 views | londonlisa2001 |
| Time for the Trust to step in re Siggy. on 19:15 - Aug 2 by Tummer_from_Texas |
If that's true, then why wasn't Sigurdsson sold in January?
At least 30 million was offered, allegedly. |
Clement didn't want to sell in January Tummer.
It's obvious there has been zero intention to keep him this summer. | | | |
| Time for the Trust to step in re Siggy. on 19:21 - Aug 2 with 660 views | magicdaps10 |
Do any posters know Paul Clement personally!?!
So how come do people know wether he wants him or gone or not!?! All summarizing at very best. |  |
| |
| Time for the Trust to step in re Siggy. on 19:24 - Aug 2 with 640 views | londonlisa2001 |
| Time for the Trust to step in re Siggy. on 19:21 - Aug 2 by magicdaps10 |
Do any posters know Paul Clement personally!?!
So how come do people know wether he wants him or gone or not!?! All summarizing at very best. |
Because the money funds the two or three players we have been after all summer perhaps. | | | |
| Time for the Trust to step in re Siggy. on 19:26 - Aug 2 with 622 views | Darran |
| Time for the Trust to step in re Siggy. on 19:21 - Aug 2 by magicdaps10 |
Do any posters know Paul Clement personally!?!
So how come do people know wether he wants him or gone or not!?! All summarizing at very best. |
Yes I do. 👀
 |  |
| |
Login to get fewer ads
| Time for the Trust to step in re Siggy. on 19:28 - Aug 2 with 615 views | Oldjack |
| Time for the Trust to step in re Siggy. on 19:26 - Aug 2 by Darran |
Yes I do. 👀
|
Stalking again ,and get your hair cut you scruffy tit |  |
| Prosser the Tosser dwells on Phil's bum hole like a rusty old hemorrhoid ,fact
You Greedy Bastards Get Out Of OUR Club!
|
| |
| Time for the Trust to step in re Siggy. on 19:29 - Aug 2 with 614 views | Flashberryjack |
| Time for the Trust to step in re Siggy. on 19:17 - Aug 2 by londonlisa2001 |
Clement didn't want to sell in January Tummer.
It's obvious there has been zero intention to keep him this summer. |
Wasn't Siggy linked with a £25 million move to Everton in August, but ended up signing a four year contract with us, that doesn't sound like zero intention of wanting to keep him to me. |  |
| |
| Time for the Trust to step in re Siggy. on 19:32 - Aug 2 with 604 views | magicdaps10 |
| Time for the Trust to step in re Siggy. on 19:26 - Aug 2 by Darran |
Yes I do. 👀
|
I bet Clement called Res a kunt?! | |
| |
| Time for the Trust to step in re Siggy. on 19:32 - Aug 2 with 604 views | londonlisa2001 |
| Time for the Trust to step in re Siggy. on 19:29 - Aug 2 by Flashberryjack |
Wasn't Siggy linked with a £25 million move to Everton in August, but ended up signing a four year contract with us, that doesn't sound like zero intention of wanting to keep him to me. |
That was a year ago?
As I said, they have had zero intention of keeping him this summer.
The owners stated at the beginning of the summer that his price was £40m. That has changed to £50m.
It funds the squad improvements we need.
Keeping him means we have spent £45m on one player at the expense of the squad. I like him, but the price is insane. | | | |
| Time for the Trust to step in re Siggy. on 19:37 - Aug 2 with 582 views | Darran |
| Time for the Trust to step in re Siggy. on 19:32 - Aug 2 by magicdaps10 |
I bet Clement called Res a kunt?! |
How did you know? | |
| |
| Time for the Trust to step in re Siggy. on 19:37 - Aug 2 with 581 views | Flashberryjack |
| Time for the Trust to step in re Siggy. on 19:32 - Aug 2 by londonlisa2001 |
That was a year ago?
As I said, they have had zero intention of keeping him this summer.
The owners stated at the beginning of the summer that his price was £40m. That has changed to £50m.
It funds the squad improvements we need.
Keeping him means we have spent £45m on one player at the expense of the squad. I like him, but the price is insane. |
"As I said, they have had zero intention of keeping him this summer."
If so they're making a good job of hiding it. | |
| |
| Time for the Trust to step in re Siggy. on 19:43 - Aug 2 with 559 views | 34dfgdf54 |
| Time for the Trust to step in re Siggy. on 19:32 - Aug 2 by londonlisa2001 |
That was a year ago?
As I said, they have had zero intention of keeping him this summer.
The owners stated at the beginning of the summer that his price was £40m. That has changed to £50m.
It funds the squad improvements we need.
Keeping him means we have spent £45m on one player at the expense of the squad. I like him, but the price is insane. |
I'm struggling to see how Clement has made it obvious he wants Siggy sold? |  | | |
| Time for the Trust to step in re Siggy. on 19:48 - Aug 2 with 545 views | TheResurrection |
| Time for the Trust to step in re Siggy. on 19:43 - Aug 2 by 34dfgdf54 |
I'm struggling to see how Clement has made it obvious he wants Siggy sold? |
Well I think it's been clear enough.
And he has to the Board. | |
| |
| Time for the Trust to step in re Siggy. on 19:51 - Aug 2 with 528 views | londonlisa2001 |
| Time for the Trust to step in re Siggy. on 19:37 - Aug 2 by Flashberryjack |
"As I said, they have had zero intention of keeping him this summer."
If so they're making a good job of hiding it. |
Aye, stating a price at the beginning of the summer is a definite 'hands off'.
All they are doing is negotiating.
If they didn't want to sell him, rather than say 'the price is £50m' they would have said something like, oh, I don't know, 'he's not for sale' perhaps? | | | |
| Time for the Trust to step in re Siggy. on 19:53 - Aug 2 with 517 views | Meraki |
The best one is everyone saying Siggy has refused to play for us, they have been keeping him wrapped up in cotton wool to ensure he picks up no injuries so that we can ship him out. | | | |
| Time for the Trust to step in re Siggy. on 19:54 - Aug 2 with 515 views | Darran |
| Time for the Trust to step in re Siggy. on 19:51 - Aug 2 by londonlisa2001 |
Aye, stating a price at the beginning of the summer is a definite 'hands off'.
All they are doing is negotiating.
If they didn't want to sell him, rather than say 'the price is £50m' they would have said something like, oh, I don't know, 'he's not for sale' perhaps? |
Huw Jenkins stated in public we wanted to keep him. | |
| |
| Time for the Trust to step in re Siggy. on 19:58 - Aug 2 with 500 views | TheResurrection |
| Time for the Trust to step in re Siggy. on 19:54 - Aug 2 by Darran |
Huw Jenkins stated in public we wanted to keep him. |
 | |
| |
| Time for the Trust to step in re Siggy. on 19:58 - Aug 2 with 496 views | londonlisa2001 |
| Time for the Trust to step in re Siggy. on 19:54 - Aug 2 by Darran |
Huw Jenkins stated in public we wanted to keep him. |
The owners stated a price at the beginning of the summer (which they have upped incidentally).
The whole summer has been a negotiation. One that has been far too protracted and needs to be sorted before the weekend.
Why do you think we've spent the whole summer looking at forwards, full backs etc, when Clement has admitted that if Siggy stays we won't get anyone else? Because we've always known he's off.
This is all just being played out. | | | |
| Time for the Trust to step in re Siggy. on 19:58 - Aug 2 with 492 views | dobjack2 |
| Time for the Trust to step in re Siggy. on 19:48 - Aug 2 by TheResurrection |
Well I think it's been clear enough.
And he has to the Board. |
So who is your pal on the board that is feeding you this information then? | | | |
| Time for the Trust to step in re Siggy. on 19:59 - Aug 2 with 484 views | Darran |
| Time for the Trust to step in re Siggy. on 19:58 - Aug 2 by londonlisa2001 |
The owners stated a price at the beginning of the summer (which they have upped incidentally).
The whole summer has been a negotiation. One that has been far too protracted and needs to be sorted before the weekend.
Why do you think we've spent the whole summer looking at forwards, full backs etc, when Clement has admitted that if Siggy stays we won't get anyone else? Because we've always known he's off.
This is all just being played out. |
Im just saying what Huw said at the beginning of June. | |
| |
| Time for the Trust to step in re Siggy. on 20:01 - Aug 2 with 476 views | ItchySphincter |
| Time for the Trust to step in re Siggy. on 19:07 - Aug 2 by TheResurrection |
Clement has wanted to sell him all along.
You can believe what you like. The above is true.
Deal with it
And as for Highjack's comment re meeting the clubs valuation. The club are split on the subject, hence the ridiculous impasse. The big problem, however, is us being massively under prepared again for the coming season.
Get it done!!! |
I wouldn't be surprised if Clement wanted their defender in the deal and it was us that floated the idea in the press. 40 odd million and a free fullback with potential sounds like a great deal to me. No wonder Everton are choking on it. |  |
| |
| Time for the Trust to step in re Siggy. on 20:01 - Aug 2 with 475 views | londonlisa2001 |
| Time for the Trust to step in re Siggy. on 19:59 - Aug 2 by Darran |
Im just saying what Huw said at the beginning of June. |
He said he would never put the future of the club in jeopardy and that the new owners would allow the club to move to the next level as well. | | | |
| |
By continuing to use the site, you agree to our use of cookies and to abide by our Terms and Conditions.
