By continuing to use the site, you agree to our use of cookies and to abide by our Terms and Conditions. We in turn value your personal details in accordance with our Privacy Policy.
Please log in or register. Registered visitors get fewer ads.
Kamala Harris Vs Donald Trump on 21:26 - Aug 28 by Professor
I ask you: Who cut the CDC pandemic unit? Put his son-in-law rather than a public health expert to lead the response? Pressured mainly GOP governors into ended lockdown too early? Went to play golf rather than lead his country through a disaster? Ignored most scientific advice? Told people this will be over by April, it’s just the flu, we are beating this? Failed to give clear guidance which led to deaths taking toxic substances?
More Americans dead than Vietnam, WW1 and 9/11. Lack of leadership
"Who cut the CDC pandemic unit? " Yes who did "cut" the Pandemic Unit or do you mean "disolved it" as the headlines say quoting Beth Cameron? Well perhaps you would like to read what happened by someone who was actually there?
"Pressured mainly GOP governors into ended lockdown too early?" Proof please. By the way "what lockdown?" did New York prevent anybody leaving during the height of their epidemic? There was no Lockdown, there were restrictions and closures, but definitley no lockdown.
"Went to play golf", so 2 months in the the pandemic national emergency the President played a round of golf on the 23rd of May, OK. Which is the day after Birx said it was OK to play golf. So do you actually expect the President to work 12 hours, 7 days a week for 2 months without a break? OK.
"Ignored most scientific advice?" specifics please.
"Told people this will be over by April, it’s just the flu, we are beating this?"
WHO advice at that time, you don't need to Quarantine, it is not infectious person to person, don't need masks etc etc.
"Failed to give clear guidance which led to deaths taking toxic substances?"
How many people actually died of those Toxic substances he did not tell them to drink or inject? He is advised about the use of a drug that is used by millions that is saving lives and also mentions medical research in to 2 other areas of treatment both of which are real.
Well let me ask you about the response to HCQ, as you are in the medical arena. Have you heard of the NICE BNF (British National Formulary)? Well they specify the correct safe dosage for current drugs. Now ask yourself this, why would the Oxford Study, the WHO study and the Braziallian study all used dangerously high levels of HCQ to treat already very ill patients? Why would anyone use 4 times the recommended dose with a drug known to have adverse affects at dangerously high doses? Well finally questions are being asked.
Then we have the great Dr Fauci that you idolise, but not everybody else does, I wonder why you never mentioned any of the things identified in this Investigative article.
Kamala Harris Vs Donald Trump on 10:52 - Aug 29 by A_Fans_Dad
"Who cut the CDC pandemic unit? " Yes who did "cut" the Pandemic Unit or do you mean "disolved it" as the headlines say quoting Beth Cameron? Well perhaps you would like to read what happened by someone who was actually there?
"Pressured mainly GOP governors into ended lockdown too early?" Proof please. By the way "what lockdown?" did New York prevent anybody leaving during the height of their epidemic? There was no Lockdown, there were restrictions and closures, but definitley no lockdown.
"Went to play golf", so 2 months in the the pandemic national emergency the President played a round of golf on the 23rd of May, OK. Which is the day after Birx said it was OK to play golf. So do you actually expect the President to work 12 hours, 7 days a week for 2 months without a break? OK.
"Ignored most scientific advice?" specifics please.
"Told people this will be over by April, it’s just the flu, we are beating this?"
WHO advice at that time, you don't need to Quarantine, it is not infectious person to person, don't need masks etc etc.
"Failed to give clear guidance which led to deaths taking toxic substances?"
How many people actually died of those Toxic substances he did not tell them to drink or inject? He is advised about the use of a drug that is used by millions that is saving lives and also mentions medical research in to 2 other areas of treatment both of which are real.
Well let me ask you about the response to HCQ, as you are in the medical arena. Have you heard of the NICE BNF (British National Formulary)? Well they specify the correct safe dosage for current drugs. Now ask yourself this, why would the Oxford Study, the WHO study and the Braziallian study all used dangerously high levels of HCQ to treat already very ill patients? Why would anyone use 4 times the recommended dose with a drug known to have adverse affects at dangerously high doses? Well finally questions are being asked.
Then we have the great Dr Fauci that you idolise, but not everybody else does, I wonder why you never mentioned any of the things identified in this Investigative article.
Read this. ~~Written by a science journalist. Shows failings of the WHO, China and the US. Ed Yong has just won an award for science writing. It truly is an excellent balanced piece:
I am very aware of the BNF, been using it for over 30 years. It will list HCQ as an anti-malarial. You may or may not know malaria is caused by four species of a protozoan parasite called Plasmodium. Plasmodium's life cycle in mammals (and indeed birds) is based in blood and the liver.
If, you have ever studied pharmacology, and in particular pharmacokinetics, you will know achieving drug levels reached in the blood and liver in the respiratory tract that are effective is much harder-hence the use of inhalation for asthma drugs and antibiotics in cystic fibrosis (the latter is what I worked on for my PhD-what was an emerging infection of CF that was near impossible to treat). So the recommended level as an antimalarial is insufficient-hence the higher dose (within toxicity limits). This is the same problem as ivemectin. It may work in cell culture but the dose needed for the respiratory tract is massive
Unlike you I have a life to lead and a fair bit of work with a new challenge of developing an online teaching module.
So this is the last post for me here. Fed up of wasting time on pointless circular arguments when very different perceptions of truth can never agree. I wish you well, you are by and large courteous and clearly an intelligent person.
For all the others I have interacted with over the years I also wish you well. Will post on Planet Swans and can easily be found on Twitter if you ever need to know anything about chickens or food borne pathogens.
0
Kamala Harris Vs Donald Trump on 11:50 - Aug 29 with 1596 views
Kamala Harris Vs Donald Trump on 11:46 - Aug 29 by Professor
Stop regurgitating right wing propaganda sites
Read this. ~~Written by a science journalist. Shows failings of the WHO, China and the US. Ed Yong has just won an award for science writing. It truly is an excellent balanced piece:
I am very aware of the BNF, been using it for over 30 years. It will list HCQ as an anti-malarial. You may or may not know malaria is caused by four species of a protozoan parasite called Plasmodium. Plasmodium's life cycle in mammals (and indeed birds) is based in blood and the liver.
If, you have ever studied pharmacology, and in particular pharmacokinetics, you will know achieving drug levels reached in the blood and liver in the respiratory tract that are effective is much harder-hence the use of inhalation for asthma drugs and antibiotics in cystic fibrosis (the latter is what I worked on for my PhD-what was an emerging infection of CF that was near impossible to treat). So the recommended level as an antimalarial is insufficient-hence the higher dose (within toxicity limits). This is the same problem as ivemectin. It may work in cell culture but the dose needed for the respiratory tract is massive
Unlike you I have a life to lead and a fair bit of work with a new challenge of developing an online teaching module.
So this is the last post for me here. Fed up of wasting time on pointless circular arguments when very different perceptions of truth can never agree. I wish you well, you are by and large courteous and clearly an intelligent person.
For all the others I have interacted with over the years I also wish you well. Will post on Planet Swans and can easily be found on Twitter if you ever need to know anything about chickens or food borne pathogens.
You do realise that if you leave, we’ll have to take our infectious disease steer from Professor Denise Welch from the Loose Women Scientific Institute!?
0
Kamala Harris Vs Donald Trump on 11:56 - Aug 29 with 1589 views
Kamala Harris Vs Donald Trump on 11:46 - Aug 29 by Professor
Stop regurgitating right wing propaganda sites
Read this. ~~Written by a science journalist. Shows failings of the WHO, China and the US. Ed Yong has just won an award for science writing. It truly is an excellent balanced piece:
I am very aware of the BNF, been using it for over 30 years. It will list HCQ as an anti-malarial. You may or may not know malaria is caused by four species of a protozoan parasite called Plasmodium. Plasmodium's life cycle in mammals (and indeed birds) is based in blood and the liver.
If, you have ever studied pharmacology, and in particular pharmacokinetics, you will know achieving drug levels reached in the blood and liver in the respiratory tract that are effective is much harder-hence the use of inhalation for asthma drugs and antibiotics in cystic fibrosis (the latter is what I worked on for my PhD-what was an emerging infection of CF that was near impossible to treat). So the recommended level as an antimalarial is insufficient-hence the higher dose (within toxicity limits). This is the same problem as ivemectin. It may work in cell culture but the dose needed for the respiratory tract is massive
Unlike you I have a life to lead and a fair bit of work with a new challenge of developing an online teaching module.
So this is the last post for me here. Fed up of wasting time on pointless circular arguments when very different perceptions of truth can never agree. I wish you well, you are by and large courteous and clearly an intelligent person.
For all the others I have interacted with over the years I also wish you well. Will post on Planet Swans and can easily be found on Twitter if you ever need to know anything about chickens or food borne pathogens.
It doesn't bother you that HCQ based on real life studies could have saved 60,000 American lives and 12,000 UK lives then. OK
Good luck on your new venture and goodbye.
-1
Kamala Harris Vs Donald Trump on 16:15 - Aug 29 with 1548 views
Kamala Harris Vs Donald Trump on 11:46 - Aug 29 by Professor
Stop regurgitating right wing propaganda sites
Read this. ~~Written by a science journalist. Shows failings of the WHO, China and the US. Ed Yong has just won an award for science writing. It truly is an excellent balanced piece:
I am very aware of the BNF, been using it for over 30 years. It will list HCQ as an anti-malarial. You may or may not know malaria is caused by four species of a protozoan parasite called Plasmodium. Plasmodium's life cycle in mammals (and indeed birds) is based in blood and the liver.
If, you have ever studied pharmacology, and in particular pharmacokinetics, you will know achieving drug levels reached in the blood and liver in the respiratory tract that are effective is much harder-hence the use of inhalation for asthma drugs and antibiotics in cystic fibrosis (the latter is what I worked on for my PhD-what was an emerging infection of CF that was near impossible to treat). So the recommended level as an antimalarial is insufficient-hence the higher dose (within toxicity limits). This is the same problem as ivemectin. It may work in cell culture but the dose needed for the respiratory tract is massive
Unlike you I have a life to lead and a fair bit of work with a new challenge of developing an online teaching module.
So this is the last post for me here. Fed up of wasting time on pointless circular arguments when very different perceptions of truth can never agree. I wish you well, you are by and large courteous and clearly an intelligent person.
For all the others I have interacted with over the years I also wish you well. Will post on Planet Swans and can easily be found on Twitter if you ever need to know anything about chickens or food borne pathogens.
You're giving up? To be honest Prof I'm quite disappointed. Good luck with your new challenge.
Kamala Harris Vs Donald Trump on 11:50 - Aug 29 by Gwyn737
You do realise that if you leave, we’ll have to take our infectious disease steer from Professor Denise Welch from the Loose Women Scientific Institute!?
It is far better to grasp the universe as it really is than to persist in delusion, however satisfying and reassuring. - Carl Sagan
-1
Kamala Harris Vs Donald Trump on 16:49 - Aug 29 with 1537 views
Kamala Harris Vs Donald Trump on 16:49 - Aug 29 by DJack
Prof educates. All AfD wants is confirmation of what he believes...which generally come from questionable (bullshit) right wing sources.
No, prof does not educate, because he get's it wrong quite often, but won't admit it, like someone else we know. He has outright slandered front line doctors saving lives because he is a double blind clinical study ivory tower type who thinks vaccines are the answer to everything. Well on the other site ask him how the HIV vaccines are doing. Then ask him how come it is the Medicines that are keeping HIV victims alive.
-1
Kamala Harris Vs Donald Trump on 23:30 - Aug 30 with 1432 views
Kamala Harris Vs Donald Trump on 23:22 - Aug 12 by AndyCole
Care to share your views on her cringeworthy, totally scripted by Biden oratory. mwsh ?
No substance, you lot.
US markets thrive, yet Harris slags it off. Wtf ?? Care to share your views ?
The Markets continue to make new All Time Highs.
Yet the usual suspects are still yet to offer their insights, excuses.
Humpty Dumbty Has no opinion, he says. The Treorchy be-spectacled self-styled “Professor” is unable to proffer. The Best of Losers simply defers to The Mirror. The Fieryfella is as dumb as his Dumbty Puppeteer on the subject.
There’s a pattern. Clueless loudmouths, conspicuous in their absence when it comes to The real world.
Pro free speech and alternative opinions -
Anti gang-bullying and poor modding thereof -
Will always make a stand against those who consistently choose to turn a blind eye
-1
Kamala Harris Vs Donald Trump on 01:51 - Sep 2 with 1349 views
Kamala Harris Vs Donald Trump on 07:15 - Sep 2 by Best_loser
True but it's a nope
Worst president in history
Worst economy in history, biggest deficit and national debt ever
Do you know all of that is false?
The world has gone to sh*t since COVID, however the American economy is holding up better than most.
Prior to COVID:-
- lowest overall unemployment in history - lowest black unemployment in history - lowest female unemployment in 65 years - highest median household income ever recorded - fastest manufacturing rate in history - more jobs since records began
As for the deficit, the deficit is something Presidents have very little control over, however the trillion deficit is less than the 1.4 trillion deficit under Obama and 2.2 trillion under Bush. Achieving the above with lower highest deficit rates for decades is remarkable.
It has been one of the most successful Presidential reigns in modern US political history. It has been so successful the left have gone into self destruct mode - literally. Destroying Democrat cities in the feint hope they can blame Trump. It hasn’t worked...
I see the markets have gone from $1.62 Biden to $2.04 Biden. Biden losing support everywhere.
Here comes the Trump train....
[Post edited 2 Sep 2020 8:53]
Swansea Independent Poster of the Year 2021 and 2022.
Kamala Harris Vs Donald Trump on 09:01 - Sep 2 by Best_loser
What's the unemployment rate right now ?
We are in a global pandemic.
It’s like blowing up Big Ben and saying “see it’s been fine all this time, is this national monument in the worst condition it’s ever been in”? See Boris’ fault
Post COVID is an irrelevance as it has no fair comparison. Pre covid has fair comparison and it was the best shape the country has been in decades, possibly ever.
It suggests that whatever the levels are now, they would be far worse under anyone else as they were starting from a far worse base. Common sense.
Swansea Independent Poster of the Year 2021 and 2022.
Come on the Don, 4 more years no doubt about it, he is going to upset the elitist apple cart and there flock of believe everything they are told sheep of which there are there quite a few on here.
-1
Kamala Harris Vs Donald Trump on 09:33 - Sep 3 with 1173 views
By continuing to use the site, you agree to our use of cookies and to abide by our Terms and Conditions.