| The London Government v WAG on 22:40 - Apr 24 with 1904 views | PentyrchJack |
Wales = Closed for business. |  |
|  |
| The London Government v WAG on 23:49 - Apr 24 with 1840 views | sP7qupUf |
Once the Welsh Government realise that the CARDIFF store may not reopen we will see a big U turn. |  | | |
| The London Government v WAG on 12:39 - Apr 25 with 1687 views | BillyChong |
Debenhams are already cooked, they’ve already closed their Irish stores. This is them trying to push attention away from their own failings. | | | |
| The London Government v WAG on 13:18 - Apr 25 with 1657 views | Whiterockin |
Debenhams was dead in the water long before this outbreak. |  | | |
| The London Government v WAG on 13:27 - Apr 25 with 1644 views | Darran |
This is not sorry about Debenhams ffs. |  |
| |
| The London Government v WAG on 13:41 - Apr 25 with 1622 views | Glyn1 |
Germany are going to ease their lockdown in stages by opening only smaller shops first, not department stores. I think we should do the same, so keep Debenhams closed. |  |
| |
| The London Government v WAG on 13:42 - Apr 25 with 1619 views | Best_loser |
Banks own debenhams |  | | |
| The London Government v WAG on 13:47 - Apr 25 with 1608 views | Highjack |
| The London Government v WAG on 13:42 - Apr 25 by Best_loser |
Banks own debenhams |
Gordon or Aaron? |  |
| |
Login to get fewer ads
| The London Government v WAG on 13:55 - Apr 25 with 1603 views | Best_loser |
| The London Government v WAG on 13:47 - Apr 25 by Highjack |
Gordon or Aaron? |
Would make a good headline
Gordon banks saved debenhams
Barclays mainly, one of the banks we bailed out, now they want Welsh taxpayers to help them with debenhams [Post edited 25 Apr 2020 13:56]
| | | |
| The London Government v WAG on 14:48 - Apr 25 with 1547 views | Best_loser |
| The London Government v WAG on 14:13 - Apr 25 by Joe_bradshaw |
That would be an even better save than the one from Pele. Dead goalkeepers are notorious for going to ground too quickly.  |
Banks can't die though
Too big to fail
Us suckers always save them | | | |
| The London Government v WAG on 14:50 - Apr 25 with 1542 views | exiledclaseboy |
| The London Government v WAG on 13:27 - Apr 25 by Darran |
This is not sorry about Debenhams ffs. |
Yes it is. It’s a dead company using a government decision as an excuse not to reopen already unprofitable stores in Wales. And you fell for it. Mug. |  |
| |
| The London Government v WAG on 16:12 - Apr 25 with 1483 views | Darran |
| The London Government v WAG on 14:50 - Apr 25 by exiledclaseboy |
Yes it is. It’s a dead company using a government decision as an excuse not to reopen already unprofitable stores in Wales. And you fell for it. Mug. |
I haven’t fallen for anything I’m concerned at the loss of a couple of thousand jobs in Wales,prick. | |
| |
| The London Government v WAG on 16:13 - Apr 25 with 1482 views | Catullus |
| The London Government v WAG on 13:55 - Apr 25 by Best_loser |
Would make a good headline
Gordon banks saved debenhams
Barclays mainly, one of the banks we bailed out, now they want Welsh taxpayers to help them with debenhams [Post edited 25 Apr 2020 13:56]
|
I didn't think we'd bailed out Barclays? It's irrelevant really.
I never saw the attraction of Debenhams anyway, it always seemed over priced to me.
I don't see it as Westmister v the Senedd anyway, I see them as just as bad as each other and if we have to pay for tqually useless politicians I'm much rather only have to pay forone lot.
Making us pay for more than one level of incompetent politicians really is taking the mick.
Besides, Online has been killing these big store based businesses for years, a slow, painful death. | |
| |
| The London Government v WAG on 17:15 - Apr 25 with 1445 views | lifelong |
I like the Mantaray range of clothing. |  | | |
| The London Government v WAG on 17:18 - Apr 25 with 1432 views | PozuelosSideys |
Throwing good money after bad there. They are already in administration, and any monies given to them are unlikely to be recouped as there be a long list of debtors. Better to keep the cash and target smaller companies who are in a far better mid to long term position to turn things around after this thing has ended. Debenhams will be broken up shortly. For once the WAG are doing the taxpayers a favour. |  |
| "Michu, Britton and Williams could have won 3-0 on their own. They wouldn't have required a keeper." | | Poll: | Hattricks |
| |
| The London Government v WAG on 17:18 - Apr 25 with 1434 views | exiledclaseboy |
| The London Government v WAG on 16:12 - Apr 25 by Darran |
I haven’t fallen for anything I’m concerned at the loss of a couple of thousand jobs in Wales,prick. |
Are you f*ck you don’t give a shit about that. | |
| |
| The London Government v WAG on 17:28 - Apr 25 with 1422 views | Darran |
| The London Government v WAG on 17:18 - Apr 25 by exiledclaseboy |
Are you f*ck you don’t give a shit about that. |
You’re saying I don’t give a shit about thousands of jobs being lost?
Mmm that’s interesting. | |
| |
| The London Government v WAG on 17:29 - Apr 25 with 1417 views | exiledclaseboy |
| The London Government v WAG on 17:28 - Apr 25 by Darran |
You’re saying I don’t give a shit about thousands of jobs being lost?
Mmm that’s interesting. |
Yes I am. | |
| |
| The London Government v WAG on 17:30 - Apr 25 with 1416 views | Darran |
| The London Government v WAG on 17:29 - Apr 25 by exiledclaseboy |
Yes I am. |
Are you drunk? Of course I care. | |
| |
| The London Government v WAG on 17:36 - Apr 25 with 1406 views | exiledclaseboy |
| The London Government v WAG on 17:30 - Apr 25 by Darran |
Are you drunk? Of course I care. |
Not yet. Give it an hour. If your first thought wasfor people’s jobs how come the thread has the title it does? | |
| |
| The London Government v WAG on 17:41 - Apr 25 with 1399 views | Darran |
| The London Government v WAG on 17:36 - Apr 25 by exiledclaseboy |
Not yet. Give it an hour. If your first thought wasfor people’s jobs how come the thread has the title it does? |
Because it’s not just about jobs.
Fuçk me this Mod thing has gone to your head hasn’t it? | |
| |
| The London Government v WAG on 17:42 - Apr 25 with 1398 views | exiledclaseboy |
| The London Government v WAG on 17:41 - Apr 25 by Darran |
Because it’s not just about jobs.
Fuçk me this Mod thing has gone to your head hasn’t it? |
 I’ll ban you if you’re not careful. | |
| |
| The London Government v WAG on 17:45 - Apr 25 with 1393 views | Darran |
| The London Government v WAG on 17:42 - Apr 25 by exiledclaseboy |
I’ll ban you if you’re not careful. |
Do you know how to? | |
| |
| The London Government v WAG on 17:46 - Apr 25 with 1390 views | Highjack |
Mod wars! | |
| |
| |
By continuing to use the site, you agree to our use of cookies and to abide by our Terms and Conditions.
