| New Front of Shirt Sponsor 15:19 - Jun 5 with 32345 views | BAWHoops | No betting companies allowed now.... so we've gone with an 'online casino' Mr Q. https://www.qpr.co.uk/news/202 I know we need to sell off to the highest bidder, but this really upsets me |  |
| http://blogandwhitehoops.wordpress.com/ |
| |  |
| New Front of Shirt Sponsor on 16:50 - Jun 8 with 3557 views | R_from_afar |
| New Front of Shirt Sponsor on 19:27 - Jun 5 by Northernr | Never a good sign when it’s shoved out at 4pm on a Friday. Equally never good when the best defence is “well at least it’s not smack”. |
Indeed. The PR department I used to work for had a sacrosanct rule of no press releases on a Friday *at any time*. |  |
| "Things had started becoming increasingly desperate at Loftus Road but QPR have been handed a massive lifeline and the place has absolutely erupted. it's carnage. It's bedlam. It's 1-1." |
|  |
| New Front of Shirt Sponsor on 17:18 - Jun 8 with 3455 views | charmr | Can’t we just say it looks tacky and makes the kit look like shyte. |  | |  |
| New Front of Shirt Sponsor on 20:41 - Jun 8 with 3292 views | Gloucs_R |
| New Front of Shirt Sponsor on 16:28 - Jun 8 by Padulas_Shampoo | Except a lot of the things on that list ARE banned and the rest aren't plastered absolutely all over the sport trying to tempt people into an addicting tendency / taking advantage of people that already have one. They might be more or less dangerous but they're not completely synonomised with football. https://www.itv.com/news/2025- "During the match between Wolverhampton and Manchester City, gambling adverts and logos were at their highest, totalling 5,262 - an average of 22 per minute." That is completely outrageous, exploitative and dangerous in anyone's book, surely? And we're doing our little bit to encourage it. But that's ok because of money? Distasteful is an understatement. |
Listen, I don't like them as a sponsor. I think it's tacky. I don't like the industry either, I've been to Vegas plenty of times with work, and don't gamble. But, is it any worse than the club selling Guinness shirts? My point was more highlighting that someone will always find a reason to moan about a sponsor. Not many industries making large sums of money any more, those we would want to be associated with anyhow. |  |
|  |
| New Front of Shirt Sponsor on 21:59 - Jun 8 with 3200 views | jack10qpr |
| New Front of Shirt Sponsor on 14:12 - Jun 8 by Gloucs_R | Playing a devil's advocate... The following products should all be banned from football shirts... Alcohol... In case you become an alcoholic Tobacco related... Potentially leads to lung cancer Vape related .. unknown but likely to lead to future lung problems Gambling ... In case you become a gambling addict High sugar foods .... Can potentially make you obese Airlines ..... World polluting the atmosphere Beef related products.... Responsible for increasing CO2 emissions Animal products.... Responsible for causing animal suffering Not specifically aimed at you 😁 But you have to draw the line somewhere. |
Completely in favour of all the suggestions, good shout! |  | |  |
| New Front of Shirt Sponsor on 22:37 - Jun 8 with 3137 views | GroveR |
| New Front of Shirt Sponsor on 22:54 - Jun 5 by Hoopstar | As a longstanding sober alcoholic I'd take my alcoholism over a gambling addicton any day of the week. Walking past the fifth betting shop in poor neighorhoods and looking inside is as bleak as popping your head in the Lucky 7 in Cricklewood Lane where I grew up. Met many a gambling addict when doing rehab talks, an awful disease. |
The Lucky 7? |  | |  |
| New Front of Shirt Sponsor on 22:55 - Jun 8 with 3090 views | Boston |
| New Front of Shirt Sponsor on 22:37 - Jun 8 by GroveR | The Lucky 7? |
Magnificent, wasn't it. |  |
|  |
| New Front of Shirt Sponsor on 22:56 - Jun 8 with 3086 views | Boston |
| New Front of Shirt Sponsor on 20:41 - Jun 8 by Gloucs_R | Listen, I don't like them as a sponsor. I think it's tacky. I don't like the industry either, I've been to Vegas plenty of times with work, and don't gamble. But, is it any worse than the club selling Guinness shirts? My point was more highlighting that someone will always find a reason to moan about a sponsor. Not many industries making large sums of money any more, those we would want to be associated with anyhow. |
Would you be a showgirl, Gloucs? |  |
|  |
| New Front of Shirt Sponsor on 23:08 - Jun 8 with 3061 views | TwoHalves |
| New Front of Shirt Sponsor on 22:56 - Jun 8 by Boston | Would you be a showgirl, Gloucs? |
He’s an Elvis impersonator. |  | |  | Login to get fewer ads
| New Front of Shirt Sponsor on 23:35 - Jun 8 with 3009 views | BazzaInTheLoft |
| New Front of Shirt Sponsor on 21:59 - Jun 8 by jack10qpr | Completely in favour of all the suggestions, good shout! |
I mean, imagine there’s no sponsorship at all |  | |  |
| New Front of Shirt Sponsor on 23:52 - Jun 8 with 2987 views | TwoHalves |
| New Front of Shirt Sponsor on 23:35 - Jun 8 by BazzaInTheLoft | I mean, imagine there’s no sponsorship at all |
Above us, only Sky. That’s the downside. |  | |  |
| New Front of Shirt Sponsor on 06:50 - Jun 9 with 2835 views | Hayesender |
| New Front of Shirt Sponsor on 20:44 - Jun 6 by BazzaInTheLoft | That's mental. Why don't clubs band together and make them in house? |
Didn't the club do that in the early 90's with the Clubhouse brand? |  |
|  |
| New Front of Shirt Sponsor on 07:10 - Jun 9 with 2810 views | Gloucs_R |
| New Front of Shirt Sponsor on 23:08 - Jun 8 by TwoHalves | He’s an Elvis impersonator. |
Thank you very much.... |  |
|  |
| New Front of Shirt Sponsor on 11:15 - Jun 9 with 2614 views | johncharles |
| New Front of Shirt Sponsor on 14:37 - Jun 8 by PunteR | I take your point, but isnt gambling a vice ? And I guess some people might have an issue if Mcdonalds sponsored us. Drinking , smoking, gambling, drug taking, pornography . All of it considered ok by some and not ok by others. Ive got two good mates, who's lives were completely messed up because of gambling. Also my brother in law has serious issues with it. I had another mate, who took his own life sadly, and one of his biggest battles along with drugs, was gambling. Look, I dont have a problem with people gambling if thats what they want to do, I just think, as a football club in the community, it has a responsibility. Promoting online gambling isnt a responsible thing to do. IMHO. |
Pornography, that could be interesting |  |
| Strong and stable my arse. |
|  |
| New Front of Shirt Sponsor on 12:45 - Jun 9 with 2543 views | Monkey_Roots | I don't like the gambling angle, would prefer us not to have anything associated with gambling on the shirt, but its not like its a new thing for us, we've been at it for years. If we're going to put a gambling company on the shirt anyway, why not one with a Q in it, works well with QPR... |  | |  |
| New Front of Shirt Sponsor on 14:55 - Jun 9 with 2431 views | Gloucs_R |
| New Front of Shirt Sponsor on 11:15 - Jun 9 by johncharles | Pornography, that could be interesting |
With the kit manufacturer being Le Coq? |  |
|  |
| New Front of Shirt Sponsor on 15:03 - Jun 9 with 2410 views | GroveR |
| New Front of Shirt Sponsor on 22:55 - Jun 8 by Boston | Magnificent, wasn't it. |
Checked every box for being a flat-roofed pub short of having a flat roof (as it was embedded inside a shop). |  | |  |
| New Front of Shirt Sponsor on 20:03 - Jun 9 with 2259 views | 7374Ranger |
| New Front of Shirt Sponsor on 06:50 - Jun 9 by Hayesender | Didn't the club do that in the early 90's with the Clubhouse brand? |
I thought if that too, but couldn't remember what the club used as a brand name . I would like an option to buy a shirt without a sponsor on it, even at an extra cost. |  | |  |
| New Front of Shirt Sponsor on 22:12 - Jun 9 with 2157 views | E17hoop | I've had a reply from the club: Thank you for your email and of taking the time to contact us relating to our new partnership with Mr Q and the announcement. As the Stanley Bowles Stand is the only stand that has QPR embossed into the seats within the stadium, the content and location was solely around including ‘Mr’ and ‘Q’ to show ‘Mr QPR’ as a part of the announcement, as opposed to this being specific to the Stanley Bowles Stand. Just to kindly confirm, the partnership was announced at 3pm on Friday afternoon, and this was not a deliberate set time or pre-planned specific marketing technique. The announcement was due to happen at any time on Friday, and the time suitable for all involved was mid-afternoon in the end, taking into consideration other announcements that day, including pre-season. Yes, we can confirm that if you would like to purchase a sponsor-free shirt, there is no issue at all in organising this for you. If you would like to send your size to us, when the shirts become available, we can organise the ordering and delivery of a non-sponsored shirt. Please know there will be no uplift or additional charge to purchasing a non-sponsored shirt, with the price of your sponsor-free shirt no different to the standard retail price. I've responded: Thank you for your reply. I appreciate the confirmation that a sponsor-free adult shirt can be ordered at the standard retail price. That is a helpful and sensible option, and I am grateful that the club is willing to arrange it. I will be in touch about ordering one once the shirts are available. On the promotional video, I understand the explanation that the Stanley Bowles Stand was used because it is the only stand with QPR embossed into the seats. However, that does not quite address the concern I raised. My concern was not that the club deliberately chose the stand because of Stan Bowles’ history with gambling. It was that this implication appears not to have been considered before using that stand as the central visual setting for the announcement of an online casino sponsor. Given Stan’s importance to QPR and his well-known history with gambling, I still think that was poor judgement, even if it was unintentional. I would be grateful if this feedback could be passed on to the relevant commercial and communications teams. Just to pull out the practical bit from the reply I received from the club. QPR have confirmed that adult sponsor-free shirts will be available at the same price as the standard retail shirt. No uplift or additional charge. They have confirmed that once the shirts are available, supporters can contact Supporter Services with their size and they will organise the ordering and delivery of a non-sponsored shirt. So if, like me, you are uncomfortable wearing another shirt with a gambling sponsor on the front, it looks like there is an option. Worth contacting Supporter Services directly when the shirts go on sale. |  |
|  |
| New Front of Shirt Sponsor on 23:26 - Jun 9 with 2047 views | joe90 |
| New Front of Shirt Sponsor on 22:12 - Jun 9 by E17hoop | I've had a reply from the club: Thank you for your email and of taking the time to contact us relating to our new partnership with Mr Q and the announcement. As the Stanley Bowles Stand is the only stand that has QPR embossed into the seats within the stadium, the content and location was solely around including ‘Mr’ and ‘Q’ to show ‘Mr QPR’ as a part of the announcement, as opposed to this being specific to the Stanley Bowles Stand. Just to kindly confirm, the partnership was announced at 3pm on Friday afternoon, and this was not a deliberate set time or pre-planned specific marketing technique. The announcement was due to happen at any time on Friday, and the time suitable for all involved was mid-afternoon in the end, taking into consideration other announcements that day, including pre-season. Yes, we can confirm that if you would like to purchase a sponsor-free shirt, there is no issue at all in organising this for you. If you would like to send your size to us, when the shirts become available, we can organise the ordering and delivery of a non-sponsored shirt. Please know there will be no uplift or additional charge to purchasing a non-sponsored shirt, with the price of your sponsor-free shirt no different to the standard retail price. I've responded: Thank you for your reply. I appreciate the confirmation that a sponsor-free adult shirt can be ordered at the standard retail price. That is a helpful and sensible option, and I am grateful that the club is willing to arrange it. I will be in touch about ordering one once the shirts are available. On the promotional video, I understand the explanation that the Stanley Bowles Stand was used because it is the only stand with QPR embossed into the seats. However, that does not quite address the concern I raised. My concern was not that the club deliberately chose the stand because of Stan Bowles’ history with gambling. It was that this implication appears not to have been considered before using that stand as the central visual setting for the announcement of an online casino sponsor. Given Stan’s importance to QPR and his well-known history with gambling, I still think that was poor judgement, even if it was unintentional. I would be grateful if this feedback could be passed on to the relevant commercial and communications teams. Just to pull out the practical bit from the reply I received from the club. QPR have confirmed that adult sponsor-free shirts will be available at the same price as the standard retail shirt. No uplift or additional charge. They have confirmed that once the shirts are available, supporters can contact Supporter Services with their size and they will organise the ordering and delivery of a non-sponsored shirt. So if, like me, you are uncomfortable wearing another shirt with a gambling sponsor on the front, it looks like there is an option. Worth contacting Supporter Services directly when the shirts go on sale. |
That’s great news about the kit! Nice one E17! |  | |  |
| New Front of Shirt Sponsor on 06:04 - Jun 10 with 1921 views | rbee | Great job E17. Really. |  | |  |
| New Front of Shirt Sponsor on 08:46 - Jun 10 with 1800 views | TwoHalves |
| New Front of Shirt Sponsor on 06:04 - Jun 10 by rbee | Great job E17. Really. |
Seconded. I’d even considered commissioning a dressmaking friend to customise a shirt by removing the offending blue hoop and replacing it with an unsullied one. I clearly hadn’t thought this through though because it would have required the purchase of two shirts, which, together with said friend’s professional fee (no mates rates, at my insistence) would, on reflection, have been unnecessarily extravagant. |  | |  |
| New Front of Shirt Sponsor on 15:27 - Jun 10 with 1647 views | Match82 |
| New Front of Shirt Sponsor on 22:12 - Jun 9 by E17hoop | I've had a reply from the club: Thank you for your email and of taking the time to contact us relating to our new partnership with Mr Q and the announcement. As the Stanley Bowles Stand is the only stand that has QPR embossed into the seats within the stadium, the content and location was solely around including ‘Mr’ and ‘Q’ to show ‘Mr QPR’ as a part of the announcement, as opposed to this being specific to the Stanley Bowles Stand. Just to kindly confirm, the partnership was announced at 3pm on Friday afternoon, and this was not a deliberate set time or pre-planned specific marketing technique. The announcement was due to happen at any time on Friday, and the time suitable for all involved was mid-afternoon in the end, taking into consideration other announcements that day, including pre-season. Yes, we can confirm that if you would like to purchase a sponsor-free shirt, there is no issue at all in organising this for you. If you would like to send your size to us, when the shirts become available, we can organise the ordering and delivery of a non-sponsored shirt. Please know there will be no uplift or additional charge to purchasing a non-sponsored shirt, with the price of your sponsor-free shirt no different to the standard retail price. I've responded: Thank you for your reply. I appreciate the confirmation that a sponsor-free adult shirt can be ordered at the standard retail price. That is a helpful and sensible option, and I am grateful that the club is willing to arrange it. I will be in touch about ordering one once the shirts are available. On the promotional video, I understand the explanation that the Stanley Bowles Stand was used because it is the only stand with QPR embossed into the seats. However, that does not quite address the concern I raised. My concern was not that the club deliberately chose the stand because of Stan Bowles’ history with gambling. It was that this implication appears not to have been considered before using that stand as the central visual setting for the announcement of an online casino sponsor. Given Stan’s importance to QPR and his well-known history with gambling, I still think that was poor judgement, even if it was unintentional. I would be grateful if this feedback could be passed on to the relevant commercial and communications teams. Just to pull out the practical bit from the reply I received from the club. QPR have confirmed that adult sponsor-free shirts will be available at the same price as the standard retail shirt. No uplift or additional charge. They have confirmed that once the shirts are available, supporters can contact Supporter Services with their size and they will organise the ordering and delivery of a non-sponsored shirt. So if, like me, you are uncomfortable wearing another shirt with a gambling sponsor on the front, it looks like there is an option. Worth contacting Supporter Services directly when the shirts go on sale. |
I'm surprised and impressed but this is a sensible policy from the club, credit to them for making that decision (and to you for chasing it down) |  | |  |
| New Front of Shirt Sponsor on 16:51 - Jun 10 with 1579 views | loftus77 | Could we get Classic FM back? |  | |  |
| New Front of Shirt Sponsor on 18:58 - Jun 10 with 1499 views | 7374Ranger |
| New Front of Shirt Sponsor on 22:12 - Jun 9 by E17hoop | I've had a reply from the club: Thank you for your email and of taking the time to contact us relating to our new partnership with Mr Q and the announcement. As the Stanley Bowles Stand is the only stand that has QPR embossed into the seats within the stadium, the content and location was solely around including ‘Mr’ and ‘Q’ to show ‘Mr QPR’ as a part of the announcement, as opposed to this being specific to the Stanley Bowles Stand. Just to kindly confirm, the partnership was announced at 3pm on Friday afternoon, and this was not a deliberate set time or pre-planned specific marketing technique. The announcement was due to happen at any time on Friday, and the time suitable for all involved was mid-afternoon in the end, taking into consideration other announcements that day, including pre-season. Yes, we can confirm that if you would like to purchase a sponsor-free shirt, there is no issue at all in organising this for you. If you would like to send your size to us, when the shirts become available, we can organise the ordering and delivery of a non-sponsored shirt. Please know there will be no uplift or additional charge to purchasing a non-sponsored shirt, with the price of your sponsor-free shirt no different to the standard retail price. I've responded: Thank you for your reply. I appreciate the confirmation that a sponsor-free adult shirt can be ordered at the standard retail price. That is a helpful and sensible option, and I am grateful that the club is willing to arrange it. I will be in touch about ordering one once the shirts are available. On the promotional video, I understand the explanation that the Stanley Bowles Stand was used because it is the only stand with QPR embossed into the seats. However, that does not quite address the concern I raised. My concern was not that the club deliberately chose the stand because of Stan Bowles’ history with gambling. It was that this implication appears not to have been considered before using that stand as the central visual setting for the announcement of an online casino sponsor. Given Stan’s importance to QPR and his well-known history with gambling, I still think that was poor judgement, even if it was unintentional. I would be grateful if this feedback could be passed on to the relevant commercial and communications teams. Just to pull out the practical bit from the reply I received from the club. QPR have confirmed that adult sponsor-free shirts will be available at the same price as the standard retail shirt. No uplift or additional charge. They have confirmed that once the shirts are available, supporters can contact Supporter Services with their size and they will organise the ordering and delivery of a non-sponsored shirt. So if, like me, you are uncomfortable wearing another shirt with a gambling sponsor on the front, it looks like there is an option. Worth contacting Supporter Services directly when the shirts go on sale. |
Thanks for this. It's good to know the option is available to buy a plain shirt at no extra cost. |  | |  |
| |