Should these asylum seekers be allowed to stay? on 11:39 - Nov 16 with 1261 views | perchrockjack | No | |
| |
Should these asylum seekers be allowed to stay? on 11:43 - Nov 16 with 1258 views | pikeypaul | Off course they should,hope you are not bringing race or ethnicity in to this. They have come from bad areas of the world and we should show some compassion and understanding. Have you not been told immigrants bring far more positives to the country and contribute far more than the indigenous people of our country? [Post edited 16 Nov 2016 11:45]
| |
| |
Should these asylum seekers be allowed to stay? on 11:56 - Nov 16 with 1235 views | jack247 | No | | | |
Should these asylum seekers be allowed to stay? on 12:14 - Nov 16 with 1213 views | Cooperman | Absolutely not, and now the British tax payer has to fund board and lodgings for the next few years. | |
| |
Should these asylum seekers be allowed to stay? on 12:17 - Nov 16 with 1206 views | acejack3065 | Well no, obviously. Unless you want someone to say yes so you can feel a bit justified in attacking someone who is an immigrant for doing something bad because it massages your prejudice, then have your fill. | | | |
Should these asylum seekers be allowed to stay? on 12:28 - Nov 16 with 1191 views | Lohengrin | A fitting outcome would be if they were just to be thrown back where they've come from and three members of the Swansea Bay Asylum Support Group served the 21 years in their stead. 'Unity in Diversity.' What better way for these people to manifest solidarity? | |
| An idea isn't responsible for those who believe in it. |
| |
Should these asylum seekers be allowed to stay? on 12:49 - Nov 16 with 1163 views | Pegojack | Absolutely not. Asylum seekers who are convicted of serious crimes should immediately have their status revoked, and they should be sent back to the countries they came from, regardless of their circumstances. No right of appeal. These are the kinds of outrages that get people like Trump elected, and if the current political leaders in Western Europe like Merkel and Hollande can't see that, they'd better wake up quick. [Post edited 16 Nov 2016 12:53]
| | | |
Should these asylum seekers be allowed to stay? on 13:00 - Nov 16 with 1138 views | pikeypaul | Merkel will be gone by October,mark my words. Just like Brexit and Trump the people will speak. | |
| | Login to get fewer ads
Should these asylum seekers be allowed to stay? on 13:11 - Nov 16 with 1124 views | Flashberryjack |
Should these asylum seekers be allowed to stay? on 12:28 - Nov 16 by Lohengrin | A fitting outcome would be if they were just to be thrown back where they've come from and three members of the Swansea Bay Asylum Support Group served the 21 years in their stead. 'Unity in Diversity.' What better way for these people to manifest solidarity? |
Why bother deporting them, they'll only be back in another part of Britain with a different name, anyway! they're only children. | |
| |
Should these asylum seekers be allowed to stay? on 13:12 - Nov 16 with 1123 views | dickythorpe | They should be made to run up Kilvey Hill with a telegraph pole, rope and a blindfold - then shot at dawn by Bonymaen Amateur Clay Pigeon Club members. | | | |
Should these asylum seekers be allowed to stay? on 14:25 - Nov 16 with 1073 views | DwightYorkeSuperstar | 27 offences between them in the 8 years they have been in the country. Yet they are still here. And people wonder why the likes of Trump and Farage who use immigration as their primary policy to promote are having such success. | |
| |
Should these asylum seekers be allowed to stay? on 14:27 - Nov 16 with 1072 views | perchrockjack | Great post Dwight. You re a contender for POTY | |
| |
Should these asylum seekers be allowed to stay? on 14:29 - Nov 16 with 1066 views | VARDREJACK | Scum like these will probably win an appeal then claim compensation for wrongful imprisonment, Welcome to Tony Blairs Britain 1997 where all immigrants are welcome with open arms | | | |
Should these asylum seekers be allowed to stay? on 14:37 - Nov 16 with 1058 views | Clinton | The story says only Ahmed is an asylum seeker. As punishment, they should be made to watch the Swans next three home matches, but it might infringe their human rights, because its flipping torture at the moment. | |
| If you can fill the unforgiving minute.
With sixty seconds' worth of distance run,
Yours is the Earth and everything that's in it,
And - which is more - you'll be a Man, my son! |
| |
Should these asylum seekers be allowed to stay? on 14:42 - Nov 16 with 1049 views | Highjack |
Should these asylum seekers be allowed to stay? on 14:37 - Nov 16 by Clinton | The story says only Ahmed is an asylum seeker. As punishment, they should be made to watch the Swans next three home matches, but it might infringe their human rights, because its flipping torture at the moment. |
You evil b&£tard. | |
| |
Should these asylum seekers be allowed to stay? on 14:50 - Nov 16 with 1039 views | Highjack | Every country should be welcoming to good people who enter through the right legal channels and obey the laws, but nations also should be able to boot out foreign criminals to wherever they came from. We have enough British scumbags, we don't need to import more. I'd imagine that the prospect of being sent home is more of a deterrent for these people than prison these days. | |
| |
Should these asylum seekers be allowed to stay? on 14:56 - Nov 16 with 1026 views | DwightYorkeSuperstar |
Should these asylum seekers be allowed to stay? on 14:29 - Nov 16 by VARDREJACK | Scum like these will probably win an appeal then claim compensation for wrongful imprisonment, Welcome to Tony Blairs Britain 1997 where all immigrants are welcome with open arms |
Considering a group of 30 people watched on in disbelief as they chained a man up, restrained him and stabbed him repeatedly in the head, I doubt they have any chance of appeal or compensation. So with it costing roughly £65,000 to imprison a person in this country once police, court costs and all the other steps are taken into account, in addition to the £40,000 per person per year it costs to maintain someone in prison, that is £1,100,000 the country has to pay to house these men for up the 21 years they got between them. It makes me sick. Kids like Freya Bevan are told to f*ck off and raise £150,000 themselves for life saving treatment, yet we are happy to pay £1,100,000 to house and feed these animals for decades. Anybody who is against deporting scum like this straight back to wherever they came from, even it is a warzone, can f*ck off back with them. | |
| |
Should these asylum seekers be allowed to stay? on 15:02 - Nov 16 with 1017 views | Darran |
Should these asylum seekers be allowed to stay? on 14:56 - Nov 16 by DwightYorkeSuperstar | Considering a group of 30 people watched on in disbelief as they chained a man up, restrained him and stabbed him repeatedly in the head, I doubt they have any chance of appeal or compensation. So with it costing roughly £65,000 to imprison a person in this country once police, court costs and all the other steps are taken into account, in addition to the £40,000 per person per year it costs to maintain someone in prison, that is £1,100,000 the country has to pay to house these men for up the 21 years they got between them. It makes me sick. Kids like Freya Bevan are told to f*ck off and raise £150,000 themselves for life saving treatment, yet we are happy to pay £1,100,000 to house and feed these animals for decades. Anybody who is against deporting scum like this straight back to wherever they came from, even it is a warzone, can f*ck off back with them. |
Great post. | |
| |
Should these asylum seekers be allowed to stay? on 16:33 - Nov 16 with 961 views | FieryJack |
Should these asylum seekers be allowed to stay? on 12:17 - Nov 16 by acejack3065 | Well no, obviously. Unless you want someone to say yes so you can feel a bit justified in attacking someone who is an immigrant for doing something bad because it massages your prejudice, then have your fill. |
Top post on here so far. The rest is just the usual anti-immigrant garbage spouted by people who are easily baited, and then taken hook, line & sinker. | | | |
Should these asylum seekers be allowed to stay? on 16:55 - Nov 16 with 943 views | raynor94 |
Should these asylum seekers be allowed to stay? on 14:56 - Nov 16 by DwightYorkeSuperstar | Considering a group of 30 people watched on in disbelief as they chained a man up, restrained him and stabbed him repeatedly in the head, I doubt they have any chance of appeal or compensation. So with it costing roughly £65,000 to imprison a person in this country once police, court costs and all the other steps are taken into account, in addition to the £40,000 per person per year it costs to maintain someone in prison, that is £1,100,000 the country has to pay to house these men for up the 21 years they got between them. It makes me sick. Kids like Freya Bevan are told to f*ck off and raise £150,000 themselves for life saving treatment, yet we are happy to pay £1,100,000 to house and feed these animals for decades. Anybody who is against deporting scum like this straight back to wherever they came from, even it is a warzone, can f*ck off back with them. |
Superb post | |
| |
Should these asylum seekers be allowed to stay? on 18:26 - Nov 16 with 900 views | Whiterockin |
Should these asylum seekers be allowed to stay? on 14:50 - Nov 16 by Highjack | Every country should be welcoming to good people who enter through the right legal channels and obey the laws, but nations also should be able to boot out foreign criminals to wherever they came from. We have enough British scumbags, we don't need to import more. I'd imagine that the prospect of being sent home is more of a deterrent for these people than prison these days. |
I don't disagree with you. But how can you "boot out" criminals who have gone through the correct legal channels to enter this country, without booting out our own. Smacks of discrimination? | | | |
Should these asylum seekers be allowed to stay? on 18:29 - Nov 16 with 891 views | Lohengrin |
Should these asylum seekers be allowed to stay? on 18:26 - Nov 16 by Whiterockin | I don't disagree with you. But how can you "boot out" criminals who have gone through the correct legal channels to enter this country, without booting out our own. Smacks of discrimination? |
Does it? How many do you think would have problem with it? | |
| An idea isn't responsible for those who believe in it. |
| |
Should these asylum seekers be allowed to stay? on 18:35 - Nov 16 with 879 views | Whiterockin |
Should these asylum seekers be allowed to stay? on 18:29 - Nov 16 by Lohengrin | Does it? How many do you think would have problem with it? |
Personally I would not have a problem with it. But anyone who is thrown out would have a right of appeal under human rights. The only way around it would be, once we are out of the EEC, make it a provision that anyone allowed in has to meet certain criteria to stay here or expect to be deported. | | | |
Should these asylum seekers be allowed to stay? on 18:39 - Nov 16 with 872 views | Darran |
Should these asylum seekers be allowed to stay? on 18:35 - Nov 16 by Whiterockin | Personally I would not have a problem with it. But anyone who is thrown out would have a right of appeal under human rights. The only way around it would be, once we are out of the EEC, make it a provision that anyone allowed in has to meet certain criteria to stay here or expect to be deported. |
If you're breaking the law the way this lot are you should lose your right to appeal. | |
| |
Should these asylum seekers be allowed to stay? on 18:41 - Nov 16 with 870 views | oh_tommy_tommy | We should deport all criminals . Like the good old days . Thief - Cut their hands off . Peado- balls off ,then hung Cold blooded murder - shot . Fraud - 2 years community service cleaning the streets . Why waste money on prison sentances ? Scum all of them , all colours all nationality's | |
| |
| |