| Furs leaving on 23:15 - Nov 29 with 2835 views | Ned_Kennedys |
| Furs leaving on 15:07 - Nov 29 by GroveR |
I make a point that some people hold absolutist binary opinions and you prove it with the first four words of your reply. Well done, I'm impressed.
If you were at the Ipswich game and think that Esquerdinha is ready to be considered back up, I worry for you. |
Of course he’s a back up which means he’s not a regular starter. He’s a young kid so perhaps not write him off straight away eh? Be a bit more flexible in your thinking. |  | |  |
| Furs leaving on 23:20 - Nov 29 with 2796 views | Northernr |
| Furs leaving on 12:50 - Nov 29 by Ned_Kennedys |
What a terrible example to make your point: Larkeche was due to be our first choice left back with Esquerdinha as back up and a few others like Field able to play there if needed. Larkeche gets a long term injury so the club bring in a loan player with Championship experience to cover who has turned out to be a very good left back for us.
Well done for finding the negatives about QPR from that. |
Yeh that is actually a positive tbf. If we’d had to follow through with the plan of Larkeche at LB with Esquerdinha as cover it would have gone every bit as well as their Joe Walsh first choice goalkeeper model. |  | | |
| Furs leaving on 23:45 - Nov 29 with 2708 views | Ned_Kennedys |
| Furs leaving on 15:00 - Nov 29 by mart_Goblin |
Round and round and round we go .
The people throwing up distress flares on this message board don’t do it for their own ego as far as I can tell. They are trying to warn fans , without getting people in trouble of things they may find alarming and what other likeminded fans might be interested in .
The constant push back from the same old faces is frustrating .
You don’t have to agree or believe what’s said , of course , but the constant playground ‘politics of envy ‘, not liking that people know things you don’t know, is a little tiring .
Anyway , enjoy the game |
“The people throwing up distress flares on this message board don’t do it for their own ego as far as I can tell. They are trying to warn fans , without getting people in trouble of things they may find alarming and what other likeminded fans might be interested in”
Haha most readers of this message board don’t have a clue what you ITKs are ‘warning’ them about as it’s all vaguely hinted at and you all get upset if challenged about things you post. And there’s ALWAYS something to get upset about at QPR, as there is at virtually every football club yet some seem to spend their time waiting for the next issue to get worked up about and rush to post about nefarious activities behind the scenes. Best way to ‘protect the innocent’ who are apparently happily feeding the dirt is perhaps keep it to yourselves? | | | |
| Furs leaving on 23:51 - Nov 29 with 2681 views | Ned_Kennedys |
| Furs leaving on 16:09 - Nov 29 by mart_Goblin |
Exactly.
How arrogant to think that people will just tell you privately.
Majority have no idea who you are or who you might tell .
People’s livelihoods are at stake. |
Wow.
If “People’s livelihoods are at stake” if the sources of the ITKs’ information became public knowledge then perhaps don’t post the details on a public football fans forum? | | | |
| Furs leaving on 09:36 - Nov 30 with 2423 views | francisbowles |
Just a small diversion from the dialogue.
Thank you Paul Furlong. Maybe when Andy has had enough and the current regime has moved on, come back as our club ambassador. |  | | |
| Furs leaving (n/t) on 10:24 - Nov 30 with 2307 views | nadera78 |
| Furs leaving (n/t) on 22:58 - Nov 29 by BazzaInTheLoft |
Call me nostradamus.
Anonymous accounts on social media claiming this very thing. [Post edited 29 Nov 23:13]
|
Yes, I've noticed that too. With the added insinuation that the people criticising his sacking are only doing so because he was passing them information.
I keep making the comparison with the Paladini regime, but the parallels are stark. I've had more than enough of it. | | | |
| Furs leaving on 10:29 - Nov 30 with 2288 views | 1BobbyHazell |
Dear Ned and Numpty,
There are, so I'm told, over 50 billion pages available to peruse on the Internet. All but a tiny handful of them have absolutely no QPR fans trying to pass off a bit of insider knowledge they have to other QPR fans interested in such things. May I suggest you go and enjoy a few of these other pages where your delicate sensibilities will not be so clearly threatened.
I would also ask that you keep your inner 1980's East German Ministry Head of Information selves in check and decease from trying to stop QPR fans with a bit of insider knowledge passing it on to those among us (me) who are interested in hearing such things.
It's one thing to not be in to it yourself but to try and prevent it for the rest of us....quite the ego.
I don't require your interventionist censorship. I am an intelligent man who can assess the validity and meaning of things I read and make up my own mind of what they do or don't reveal about situations without rabidly believing everything said or automatically giving it credence.
Thank you in advance
Much love
1BH x |  | | |
| Furs leaving on 12:09 - Nov 30 with 2120 views | connell10 |
| Furs leaving on 23:45 - Nov 29 by Ned_Kennedys |
“The people throwing up distress flares on this message board don’t do it for their own ego as far as I can tell. They are trying to warn fans , without getting people in trouble of things they may find alarming and what other likeminded fans might be interested in”
Haha most readers of this message board don’t have a clue what you ITKs are ‘warning’ them about as it’s all vaguely hinted at and you all get upset if challenged about things you post. And there’s ALWAYS something to get upset about at QPR, as there is at virtually every football club yet some seem to spend their time waiting for the next issue to get worked up about and rush to post about nefarious activities behind the scenes. Best way to ‘protect the innocent’ who are apparently happily feeding the dirt is perhaps keep it to yourselves? |
Reading between the lines I'd say Nourry seems to be a back stabbing tyrant....just my take ! |  |
| AND WHEN I DREAM , I DREAM ABOUT YOU AND WHEN I SCREAM I SCREAM ABOUT YOU!!!!! | | Poll: | best number 10 ever? |
| |
Login to get fewer ads
| Furs leaving on 12:12 - Nov 30 with 2113 views | BazzaInTheLoft |
I mean, seems to me that one of two things are happening:
1. Concerns are false and reputational damage is being done to the club
2. Concerns are true and reputational damage is being done to the club
Either way, the ball is in the club's court. Do a fans forum and media meet, specific to just these concerns, and have it out good a proper.
Be aware though, that if number two is the case they won't want to do it and will probably rely on threats of legal action and more NDAs. [Post edited 30 Nov 12:14]
|  | | |
| Furs leaving on 13:00 - Nov 30 with 2023 views | GroveR |
| Furs leaving on 23:15 - Nov 29 by Ned_Kennedys |
Of course he’s a back up which means he’s not a regular starter. He’s a young kid so perhaps not write him off straight away eh? Be a bit more flexible in your thinking. |
Flexibly speaking, I would advise you not to be so condescending to your fellow supporters eh? |  | | |
| Furs leaving on 13:22 - Nov 30 with 1964 views | mart_Goblin |
| Furs leaving on 23:51 - Nov 29 by Ned_Kennedys |
Wow.
If “People’s livelihoods are at stake” if the sources of the ITKs’ information became public knowledge then perhaps don’t post the details on a public football fans forum? |
Personally , I haven’t |  | | |
| Furs leaving (n/t) on 14:06 - Nov 30 with 1873 views | BazzaInTheLoft |
| Furs leaving (n/t) on 10:24 - Nov 30 by nadera78 |
Yes, I've noticed that too. With the added insinuation that the people criticising his sacking are only doing so because he was passing them information.
I keep making the comparison with the Paladini regime, but the parallels are stark. I've had more than enough of it. |
I see the reputation guardians are silent on this though. | | | |
| Furs leaving on 14:43 - Nov 30 with 1779 views | Ned_Kennedys |
| Furs leaving on 10:29 - Nov 30 by 1BobbyHazell |
Dear Ned and Numpty,
There are, so I'm told, over 50 billion pages available to peruse on the Internet. All but a tiny handful of them have absolutely no QPR fans trying to pass off a bit of insider knowledge they have to other QPR fans interested in such things. May I suggest you go and enjoy a few of these other pages where your delicate sensibilities will not be so clearly threatened.
I would also ask that you keep your inner 1980's East German Ministry Head of Information selves in check and decease from trying to stop QPR fans with a bit of insider knowledge passing it on to those among us (me) who are interested in hearing such things.
It's one thing to not be in to it yourself but to try and prevent it for the rest of us....quite the ego.
I don't require your interventionist censorship. I am an intelligent man who can assess the validity and meaning of things I read and make up my own mind of what they do or don't reveal about situations without rabidly believing everything said or automatically giving it credence.
Thank you in advance
Much love
1BH x |
“Interventionist censorship”
What pompous nonsense. If you want to be a nodding dog for every vague titbit of insider info that is posted on a football forum then you carry on mate. Some of us will continue to challenge, question and (shockingly to you it seems) disagree whenever we want to. If that is hard for you to deal with then so be it. | | | |
| Furs leaving on 16:03 - Nov 30 with 1675 views | gigiisourgod |
| Furs leaving on 20:33 - Nov 28 by KensalT |
For the benefit of anyone who hasn't read the Matt Winton piece the link is here and I will paste the text below the link:
https://medium.com/@matt.winton/why-i-support-qprs-leadership-and-why-so-much-of
Why I Support QPR’s Leadership — And Why So Much of the Criticism Misses the Point
I wanted to put some of my views down in longer form, mainly because it’s impossible to distil this outlook into a tweet without getting dragged into misunderstandings. Over the last week or so, I’ve again found myself in heated back-and-forths on X, trying to dampen a groundswell of criticism that I simply don’t think is warranted. And what strikes me is this: so much of the criticism of the club is based on things supporters have no real understanding of behind the scenes.
This isn’t a new pattern; it’s been consistent over the last year. We’ve had waves of anger over issues where the club quite literally cannot divulge details, often for legal, strategic, or employment-related reasons. Yet, even with complete information absent, the reflex is always to assume the worst.
The Transparency Myth
Injuries and contracts:
For months, fans complained about a lack of transparency. The club stated clearly that they preferred to keep details private for strategic reasons, something many clubs around the world do as standard. The club actually took learnings from that communication backlash and has already been far more transparent about injuries this season.
Martí on gardening leave:
The outrage machine went into overdrive when Martí was placed on gardening leave. Nobody outside the club knows the details, not the contractual obligations, not the HR context, not the legal restrictions, and not the internal dynamics. Matters of employment law and severance are always confidential in every business, across every sector. Yet somehow, QPR fans expect full disclosure and assume wrongdoing when they don’t get it.
This week’s uproar about Furlong:
WLS published a story saying he might be leaving. No explanation, no real info. For all we know, he could be ill, he could have a new job, or the club simply may feel it’s the right time for a change. But again, despite having zero facts, fans rush to blame the club, accuse leadership of disloyalty, and side with the employee.
It’s extraordinary how easy it seems to be to assume the club is in the wrong without knowing a single thing about what has actually happened.
Why My View Has Changed — And Why I Back the Leadership
Now, on a personal level, this comes from someone who has a long history of being critical of the owners. And, to be fair, there have been periods where criticism was justified based on the information in the public domain.
But right now? I’m throwing my support behind the club, and particularly behind the people running it behind the scenes, because I see genuine progress, genuine competence, and genuine strategy. And after a decade of inconsistent direction, that matters.
For years, fans have said:
· “We need a club model that isn’t dependent on the manager.”
· “We need clarity about who’s actually responsible for decisions.”
· “We need to modernise our operations.”
Well, now we finally have exactly that. For the first time in ages, accountability is clear. We know who leads on what. We know where decisions sit. And we’ve put in place a structure that is ahead of what many competitors are doing, which is vital given our budget constraints.
And crucially, we’re not relying on a single personality to hold everything together, unlike the Holloway or Warburton periods, where things worked largely because the manager was strong enough to mask deeper structural issues. Once they left, everything fell apart. That’s not a sustainable model.
This time, it feels different.
The Evidence: Tangible, Measurable Progress
Criticism thrives in the absence of information. So let’s focus on what we do know, using actual data and on-pitch evidence.
1. The Managerial Decision: Replacing Martí Was Spot On
Getting rid of Martí already looks like an unquestionably smart move. The numbers are clear:
· Win rate / points:
QPR went from 2 wins in 17 to 7 wins over the same stage. Points per game more than doubled from 0.71 → 1.47.
· Attack:
Goals scored increased from 0.94 → 1.24 per game — a big shift in productivity.
· Defence:
Goals conceded improved from 1.65 → 1.47 per game. This despite shipping 7 in one game.
· Overall:
We’ve gone from being in relegation form last season to being a competitive, stable, mid-table side this season.
Stephan is a clear upgrade on Martí, and Martí’s struggles at Leicester only reinforce that reality. This wasn’t luck. It was a strategic call made by people who actually understand what’s going on inside the club.
2. Talent Acquisition: A Recruitment Structure That Actually Works
In the last two years, recruitment has transformed. The structure, the process, the profiles, all of it.
· The squad is more balanced than at any point in the last decade.
· The depth is night-and-day from previous seasons; we can finally rotate without collapsing.
· Young talent in the DLS pipeline, Smith, Akindelini, Isak, Esquardinho, is genuine, not hype.
· The club is smarter, leaner, and far more strategic than during the Ferdinand era.
Yes, Ferdinand inherited a mess. Yes, he did some good things. But after eight years, the club was still lopsided and under-resourced. In two years, Nourry has achieved more with less.
3. Youth Structure: Real Progress, Real Results
The academy and DLS setup is producing consistent, meaningful results across age groups.
· The U18s are strong and cohesive.
· A group of U16s went to Manchester United and won.
· There’s a conveyor belt forming between U18 → DLS → first team.
· We have numerous young players on loan in the National League performing incredibly well.
Under the previous structure, after eight years, we had virtually no meaningful pipeline to the first team. Players were poorly developed, given overly long contracts, and retained far too long. Now we’re seeing a strategy that works.
Performance × acquisition × development, all trending upward.
4. Operational Decisions: Small Things That Make a Big Difference
A good example: removing away fans from the Lower School End.
It’s a simple, clever decision that instantly made Loftus Road a more difficult place for visiting teams. These marginal gains matter.
Most Importantly: QPR Is Fun Again
On a personal level, taking my kids to Loftus Road this season has been a joy. They see:
· Goals in the Loft End
· Wins
· Attacking football
· A team playing with identity and pride
It’s night and day from the previous two years where home wins were rare and goals even rarer.
The Owners: Still Investing, Still Writing Off Losses
People love to assume the owners are inactive or detached. Yet they continue to write off losses and keep the club afloat while moving us toward becoming as self-sufficient as possible. That matters. It’s real commitment, not PR.
So Why the Relentless Negativity?
I genuinely don’t understand why so many smart, well-informed fans choose contempt as their default response. Why do they assume the worst of decision-makers without knowing any facts? Why do they ignore the clear, measurable progress in favour of hypothetical grievances?
We must stop whinging about the unknowns and start supporting the many positives backed by actual evidence.
My Conclusion
I support the current leadership because:
· I see measurable progress.
· I see strategy.
· I see accountability.
· I see improvement across every key metric that matters.
· And I see a club moving in the right direction both on and off the pitch.
We’ve spent years begging for exactly this model of operation. Now that we have it, it’s time to get behind it.
Enough complaining about what we don’t know.
Let’s support the things we do know, and the people delivering them. |
He forgot to mention people being able to watch their favourite players again #fangirl | | | |
| Furs leaving on 16:08 - Nov 30 with 1652 views | 1BobbyHazell |
| Furs leaving on 14:43 - Nov 30 by Ned_Kennedys |
“Interventionist censorship”
What pompous nonsense. If you want to be a nodding dog for every vague titbit of insider info that is posted on a football forum then you carry on mate. Some of us will continue to challenge, question and (shockingly to you it seems) disagree whenever we want to. If that is hard for you to deal with then so be it. |
The ludicrous, strawman based, way that you have replied to my post comes as no surprise. Nothing you have put is accurate or applies. You are clearly living in your own head.
The fact you think that just by being interested in hearing some information from incredibly well known and trusted contributors like Clive and Hunter automatically makes me/us a 'nodding dog' at least gives us some psychological insight into why you think they shouldn't share it with us. You have some rabid misguided inner mental program that assumes we can't handle hearing things like that without flying into some sort of rage against the machine.
To he clear, because you clearly need it kept that way, I have zero problem with people discussing, "challenging, questioning or disagreeing" any of it. On the contrary in fact, that is exactly what a message board is for. Doing just that is something I've been enjoying on here and dotorg for 20 years. If you care to look back you'll find me on different sides of the fence on various issues around all the Nourry etc issues in the past.
My problem as I made quite clear in my post is when the likes of you and Numpty say that they shouldn't post it. Fu*k off with that and then f*ck off again. That is censorship. It's got f*ck all to do with challenging, questioning and disagreeing.
If you don't want to read it don't, but don't come on here and try and King Canute it away for the rest of us.
That goes for you too Numpty. The fact that you, of all posters, think they have the right to tell respected, insightful and interesting posters what they can and can't put on here is an irony beyond any comprehension.
Discuss, debate, argue, disagree, challenge and rage but do not f*cking censor. [Post edited 30 Nov 16:10]
| | | |
| Furs leaving on 17:49 - Nov 30 with 1486 views | numptydumpty |
| Furs leaving on 16:08 - Nov 30 by 1BobbyHazell |
The ludicrous, strawman based, way that you have replied to my post comes as no surprise. Nothing you have put is accurate or applies. You are clearly living in your own head.
The fact you think that just by being interested in hearing some information from incredibly well known and trusted contributors like Clive and Hunter automatically makes me/us a 'nodding dog' at least gives us some psychological insight into why you think they shouldn't share it with us. You have some rabid misguided inner mental program that assumes we can't handle hearing things like that without flying into some sort of rage against the machine.
To he clear, because you clearly need it kept that way, I have zero problem with people discussing, "challenging, questioning or disagreeing" any of it. On the contrary in fact, that is exactly what a message board is for. Doing just that is something I've been enjoying on here and dotorg for 20 years. If you care to look back you'll find me on different sides of the fence on various issues around all the Nourry etc issues in the past.
My problem as I made quite clear in my post is when the likes of you and Numpty say that they shouldn't post it. Fu*k off with that and then f*ck off again. That is censorship. It's got f*ck all to do with challenging, questioning and disagreeing.
If you don't want to read it don't, but don't come on here and try and King Canute it away for the rest of us.
That goes for you too Numpty. The fact that you, of all posters, think they have the right to tell respected, insightful and interesting posters what they can and can't put on here is an irony beyond any comprehension.
Discuss, debate, argue, disagree, challenge and rage but do not f*cking censor. [Post edited 30 Nov 16:10]
|
I put on here it should be in the public domain Bobby so you are actually criticising me , when what I have put on here is the same as yourself.
This is all very unnecessary and wrong.
Anyhow this thread WAS about Paul Furlong.
I am not itk and if people do know things, all well and good as far as I am concerned.
I think its best to leave it there, as this back and forth is getting nowhere and its incredibly very cross wires. You are criticising me when I have the same opinion as yourself.
And at the nd of the day this board is like a hobby for me, a nice distraction, away from all the everyday stresses of life.
For me this kind of intensity of anger is too much and needs towards others is very unnecessary.
Its a board where we ultimately want the same thing. Success for QPR, but there's no need for such antagonism towards others who may or may not have a difference of opinion.
I dont mind if others have different views either. Everyone is different. Be boring if we were all the same and had the same opinions and I can change my mind on occasions if others offer alternative viewpoints to things I may not have considered.
Anyhow all I can say is Peace and C'mon You Rr's ...
Best to leave this now [Post edited 30 Nov 17:52]
|  |
| |
| Furs leaving on 18:18 - Nov 30 with 1413 views | 1BobbyHazell |
Fair enough Numpty. I'm not quite sure we saw things the same.
But you're right, it's best left in peace. | | | |
| Furs leaving on 22:04 - Nov 30 with 1162 views | Myke |
My own view on this would be in keeping with the ‘grizzly traditional supporter that Clive referred to in today’s (excellent) match report. All I can accurately comment on is what it was like to be a (QPR) fan in the west of Ireland in the ‘70’s. Back in the day, long before the internet, all we fans were concerned about were two things. By far the most important of these was the result at 4.45 (none of that wimp-like ‘time added on’ nonsense) on a Sat evening and occasionally, 9.15 (7.30 KO in those days lads) on a Wednesday night. The second thing was a new signing or departure which could occur just as easily in November as June, depending on how the season was going and was usually done and dusted before we got to hear about it.
We were not privy to whether Gerry Francis was available for selection after his back injury until the team was announced 30 minutes before KO. We did not speculate on whether Johnny Reserve (no ‘development’ squad either) was ready for the first team, because we did not know who played for the reserves in the Football Combination. We did not know who was on the board except that Jim Gregory was the main man. I could go on and on, but no need to labour the point
In that context; Paul Furlong, top guy, sorry to see him go. But that result and perfomance yesterday REALLY pi$$ed me off. | | | |
| Furs leaving (n/t) on 22:14 - Nov 30 with 1140 views | wombat |
| Furs leaving (n/t) on 10:24 - Nov 30 by nadera78 |
Yes, I've noticed that too. With the added insinuation that the people criticising his sacking are only doing so because he was passing them information.
I keep making the comparison with the Paladini regime, but the parallels are stark. I've had more than enough of it. |
Thing is this time nobody is giving away free holidays so far to tout the club line |  |
| |
| Furs leaving on 22:15 - Nov 30 with 1127 views | MrSheen |
| Furs leaving on 22:04 - Nov 30 by Myke |
My own view on this would be in keeping with the ‘grizzly traditional supporter that Clive referred to in today’s (excellent) match report. All I can accurately comment on is what it was like to be a (QPR) fan in the west of Ireland in the ‘70’s. Back in the day, long before the internet, all we fans were concerned about were two things. By far the most important of these was the result at 4.45 (none of that wimp-like ‘time added on’ nonsense) on a Sat evening and occasionally, 9.15 (7.30 KO in those days lads) on a Wednesday night. The second thing was a new signing or departure which could occur just as easily in November as June, depending on how the season was going and was usually done and dusted before we got to hear about it.
We were not privy to whether Gerry Francis was available for selection after his back injury until the team was announced 30 minutes before KO. We did not speculate on whether Johnny Reserve (no ‘development’ squad either) was ready for the first team, because we did not know who played for the reserves in the Football Combination. We did not know who was on the board except that Jim Gregory was the main man. I could go on and on, but no need to labour the point
In that context; Paul Furlong, top guy, sorry to see him go. But that result and perfomance yesterday REALLY pi$$ed me off. |
3.15 kick-offs - what a great gimmick. The attention of the whole football world would be turned to your result.
Stockport County, was it? |  | | |
| Furs leaving on 22:55 - Nov 30 with 1029 views | Myke |
| Furs leaving on 22:15 - Nov 30 by MrSheen |
3.15 kick-offs - what a great gimmick. The attention of the whole football world would be turned to your result.
Stockport County, was it? |
Jeepers Mr S. I thought I was weak at Maths. I know times were tougher back then. But they were allowed 15 minutes for half time! | | | |
| Furs leaving on 00:16 - Dec 1 with 935 views | Ned_Kennedys |
| Furs leaving on 16:08 - Nov 30 by 1BobbyHazell |
The ludicrous, strawman based, way that you have replied to my post comes as no surprise. Nothing you have put is accurate or applies. You are clearly living in your own head.
The fact you think that just by being interested in hearing some information from incredibly well known and trusted contributors like Clive and Hunter automatically makes me/us a 'nodding dog' at least gives us some psychological insight into why you think they shouldn't share it with us. You have some rabid misguided inner mental program that assumes we can't handle hearing things like that without flying into some sort of rage against the machine.
To he clear, because you clearly need it kept that way, I have zero problem with people discussing, "challenging, questioning or disagreeing" any of it. On the contrary in fact, that is exactly what a message board is for. Doing just that is something I've been enjoying on here and dotorg for 20 years. If you care to look back you'll find me on different sides of the fence on various issues around all the Nourry etc issues in the past.
My problem as I made quite clear in my post is when the likes of you and Numpty say that they shouldn't post it. Fu*k off with that and then f*ck off again. That is censorship. It's got f*ck all to do with challenging, questioning and disagreeing.
If you don't want to read it don't, but don't come on here and try and King Canute it away for the rest of us.
That goes for you too Numpty. The fact that you, of all posters, think they have the right to tell respected, insightful and interesting posters what they can and can't put on here is an irony beyond any comprehension.
Discuss, debate, argue, disagree, challenge and rage but do not f*cking censor. [Post edited 30 Nov 16:10]
|
Calm down mate: it’s really not worth getting so angry about things. | | | |
| Furs leaving on 09:39 - Dec 1 with 701 views | terryb |
Actually it was ten minutes for half time!
Rangers did have 3.15pm Saturday kick offs in the early 60's, but they had disappeared by the time we won the third division & league cup. I think the reason for the later start was that the pubs in Shepherds Bush closed at 3.00pm! [Post edited 1 Dec 9:41]
| | | |
| Furs leaving on 10:44 - Dec 1 with 581 views | nick_hammersmith |
| Furs leaving on 15:40 - Nov 29 by PlanetHonneywood |
Can SUFC recall RND?
I wonder if we're trying something in lieu of his returning t'Yarkshire in a few weeks. |
Didn't CN mention that he doesn't like loan deals where there is no option to buy?
I also wonder if this option is linked to number of starts?
Otherwise I'm not sure about resting another clubs player for a game, but then not using them and instead playing one of our own (deemed surplus to requirements out of position)?
Anyway, I think Sam did well, but I'm not sure that this club has addressed the depth and quality of either fullback position for several years now [Post edited 1 Dec 10:55]
|  | | |
| Furs leaving on 10:50 - Dec 1 with 558 views | nick_hammersmith |
| Furs leaving on 16:03 - Nov 30 by gigiisourgod |
He forgot to mention people being able to watch their favourite players again #fangirl |
What?!
Did we re-sign Adel??? | | | |
| |
By continuing to use the site, you agree to our use of cookies and to abide by our Terms and Conditions.
